Posts Tagged ‘Stan Van Gundy’

Defense, Rebounding and, then, ‘Team’ Offense

Friday, June 18th, 2010

The NBA is a league with 63 years of history, and any franchise which truly aspires to win the championship, one day in the future, but refuses to acknowledge the primacy of the 3 main aspects of basketball success …

#1 Team Defense,

#2 Rebounding,

and,

#3 Team [not individual] Offense

… is simply kidding itself, as well as its loyal fanbase.

As Pat Riley so aptly said, years ago, while winning back-to-back titles with the original ShowTime LA Lakers:

“No Rebounds; No Rings.”

and,

as KG & Co. have so eloquently and rhythmically espoused, en masse, for the last few years …

What it takes to win the NBA Championship really does involve making a total Team Commitment to playing the game the RIGHT WAY.

Congratulations to the LA Lakers organization for learning its lessons well, and being able to ‘walk the walk.’

Yo, Adrian …

Thursday, May 27th, 2010

… it may be too late for certain members of the basketball community to offer an apology to the Orlando Magic.

For the record:

PART A

This is what esteemed basketball writer Adrian Wojnarowski had to say about the state of the Boston Celtics vs Orlando Magic playoff series on Monday, May 25:

———————————

Magic provide only a tease in East finals

Until they prove differently, these Magic are exactly a team that wanted to win one game and say it didn’t get swept. There’s still no explanation for that gutless Game 3 performance, for giving away Games 1 and 2 in Orlando.

“Yeah, you’ve got to play one game at a time, but you have to have a belief somewhere that you can win the series,” Van Gundy insisted. “Otherwise, there’s just not enough to sustain you and keep you in the game.”

That isn’t true, because the Celtics obliterated the Magic’s spirit with those victories in Orlando and everyone could see that on Saturday night in Boston. When it mattered most, the Magic backed down and quit. This wasn’t character on Monday night, just the Magic hanging around and stealing a game when the Celtics looked like they had the Los Angeles Lakers on their minds.

This wasn’t resolve out of the Magic, this was merely a stay of execution. Yes, someone asked Vince Carter where did that resolve come from, and the first word out of his mouth? “Within.”

Within what? Within the make-believe land where a $16 million-a-year player pretends he has the professional pride of his tiny point guard and monstrous center? There are no historic comebacks coming out of the Orlando Magic, no proving to the world why they never should have been counted out. The Magic had that chance in this series and it’s long gone now.

No validation in victory on Monday night, just indictment – just a shame that it took this long out of the Magic, that it never, ever should’ve come to this in the Eastern Conference finals.

———————————

PART B

Now, today, 3 days and 2 hard-earned victories by the Magic later, this what Mr. Wojnarowski is saying:

———————————

Bruised Celtics need a leg to stand in Game 6

The tone and trajectory of the series have changed dramatically because Boston is battered, beleaguered and no longer playing peerless ball. In a month when the Boston Bruins lost a 3-0 series lead to the Philadelphia Flyers, in a city that lived the ecstasy of the Red Sox’s forever comeback from 3-0 on the Yankees, there promises to be genuine tension in the Garden. “We made it look easy early on and now it is becoming a fight,” the Celtics’ Kevin Garnett(notes) said.

———————————

Really?

The “tone” and “trajectory” of this series have now changed?

PART C

In sharp contrast to what Mr. Wojnarowski has written about this series to-date …

This is what’s been said in this space over the course of the last week:

What Stan Van Gundy needs to do in order to generate open shots for Rashard Lewis [Thu May 20]

What Doc Rivers has done to create individual match-up advantages vs Orlando [Thu May 20]

Specific reasons the Orlando Magic will win Game 5 and Game 6 [Tue May 25]

and

First time for everything … [Wed May 26]

If you are going to spend some of your time reading material on-line about what’s important in the NBA game it’s a good idea that you make your choices wisely. :-)

============================

Item #1.

The exact moment this series changed in Orlando’s favour … had nothing to do with Dwight Howard, the Magic’s best player, but … was when SVG finally made the decision to include/add Brandon Bass to his regular rotation against the specific group of players Doc Rivers was using for Boston.

Item #2.

As long as the Magic could manage to “stay alive”, each game longer this series actually goes, Doc Rivers’ strategic decision to use only 4 players [in total] at the Point Guard, Off Guard and Small Forward positions … which was specifically what provided the Celtics with their extra boost in TEAM COHESION and EXECUTION during the initial games of the series, relative to what Orlando was producing … becomes more problematic for the men from Beantown.

 

MINUTES PLAYED PER GAME and OFF DAYS

 

PLAYER

POS

G1

 

1

 

off

 

day

G2

 

3

 

off

 

days

G3

 

1

 

off

 

day

G4

 

1

 

off

 

day

G5

 

1

 

off

 

day

G6

 

1

 

off

 

day

G7

Rondo

PG

46

45

34

43

38

?

?

R-Allen

OG

39

40

38

46

41

?

?

Pierce

SF

42

40

35

47

42

?

?

T-Allen

SF/PG

17

15

18

12

11

?

?

 

 

W

W

W

L

L

?

?

In fact, not only are the Celtics’ Big Men “battered and bruised” but so, too, are their main players in the back-court positions now beginning to run out of gas. 

Item #3.

If SVG was actually willing to implement EACH of the other suggestions made in this space, since this series first began, there’s a very good chance that the specific outcomes for Game 6 and 7 would see Orlando win both by sizable margins.

Item #4.

Orlando is a superior team to Boston, as long as [1] Kevin Garnett is not 100% healthy, and [2] SVG does not get out-coached by Doc Rivers … by using his personnel in the wrong way and failing to implement the most effective game-plan [i.e. offensively, defensively and in terms of rebounding] … which is precisely what happened in Games 1, 2 and 3 of this series. 

Item #5.

When 2 legitimate heavy-weights go at it, it is prudent to wait until the full 15 rounds …

i.e. Game 1/rounds 1-3; Game 2/rounds 4-6; Game 3/rounds 7-9; Game 4/rounds 10-11; Game 5/rounds 12-13; Game 6/round 14; and, Game 7/round 15

… have actually been completed, in order to determine the winner.

Specific reasons the Orlando Magic will win Game 5 and Game 6

Tuesday, May 25th, 2010

With their victory in last night’s Game 4:

Orlando Magic 96
BOSTON CELTICS 92, OT
Complete Game Summary

the Magic have now forced a Game 5, back in Orlando, on Wednesday night [May 26, 835 PM ET] … which is good news for all those who originally forecast this to be a long series.

Despite what some reputable NBA observers might have to say today about the poor way Orlando has performed to-date …

————————————————————

Magic provide only a tease in East finals

Until they prove differently, these Magic are exactly a team that wanted to win one game and say it didn’t get swept. There’s still no explanation for that gutless Game 3 performance, for giving away Games 1 and 2 in Orlando.

“Yeah, you’ve got to play one game at a time, but you have to have a belief somewhere that you can win the series,” Van Gundy insisted. “Otherwise, there’s just not enough to sustain you and keep you in the game.”

That isn’t true, because the Celtics obliterated the Magic’s spirit with those victories in Orlando and everyone could see that on Saturday night in Boston. When it mattered most, the Magic backed down and quit. This wasn’t character on Monday night, just the Magic hanging around and stealing a game when the Celtics looked like they had the Los Angeles Lakers on their minds.

This wasn’t resolve out of the Magic, this was merely a stay of execution. Yes, someone asked Vince Carter where did that resolve come from, and the first word out of his mouth? “Within.”

Within what? Within the make-believe land where a $16 million-a-year player pretends he has the professional pride of his tiny point guard and monstrous center? There are no historic comebacks coming out of the Orlando Magic, no proving to the world why they never should have been counted out. The Magic had that chance in this series and it’s long gone now.

No validation in victory on Monday night, just indictment – just a shame that it took this long out of the Magic, that it never, ever should’ve come to this in the Eastern Conference finals.

————————————————————

… the facts are that:

1. The primary reason Orlando is trailing in this series in the first place is because of the poor job of coaching which Stan Van Gundy [i.e. SVG] did in Games 1, 2 and 3, putting their players in a gigantic hole, relative to the stellar work done by his counterpart with Boston, Doc Rivers.

If in doubt of this, please see Exhibits A, BC and D.

2. [In spite of this] Orlando has still managed to play “well enough” to only lose Game 1 by a mere 4 points [i.e. 2 possessions] and Game 2 by a mere 3 points … while getting decidedly underwhelming performances from several of their key players [i.e. including: i. Vince Carter's untimely 2 missed FTA's in the final minute of Game 2; ii. Minimal point production from Rashard Lewis and Mickael Pietrus in Games 1, 2 and 3; Minimal point production from Dwight Howard in Games 1 and 3; iii. Poor defensive efforts from Matt Barnes and Marcin Gortat in Games 1, 2 and 3; iv. Minimal point production from Vince Carter in Game 3; and, v. Poor play, overall, by Jameer Nelson].

3. SVG has, at last, begun to unravel correctly the Rotation Riddle of this group of Celtics … which included his use of:

i. Both Brandon Bass and Ryan Anderson, in Game 3, for the first time in this series, albeit for inconsequential minutes during garbage time;

ii. Bass, again, in Game 4 … this time for significant minutes during non-garbage time … albeit in, both, “right” [i.e. vs Glen Davis] and “wrong” [i.e. vs anybody else] individual match-up situations;

and,

iii. Vince Carter [vs Ray Allen or Rajon Rondo] and Mickael Pietrus [vs Paul Pierce] together for the first segment of meaningful minutes in the series to-date.

 

SUBSTITUTION CHART

 

Boston Celtics vs Orlando Magic

 

[Mon May 24 2010]

 

Time

Team

PG

OG

SF

PF

C

Start

End

Diff

    Q1

Orl

Nelson

Carter

Barnes

Lewis

Howard

00

18

+4

12:00

BOS

Rondo

R-Allen

Pierce

Garnett

Perkins

00

14

-4

[07:19]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

04:41

 

Time-out:

Regular

Boston

Orl 18

BOS 14

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Orl

Nelson

Carter

Barnes

Bass

Howard

18

18

0

04:41

BOS

Rondo

R-Allen

Pierce

Garnett

Perkins

14

14

0

[00:06]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Orl

Nelson

Carter

Barnes

Bass

Howard

18

21

+3

04:35

BOS

T-Allen

R-Allen

Pierce

Garnett

Perkins

14

14

-3

[00:57]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Orl

Nelson

Carter

Barnes

Bass

Howard

21

23

-1

03:38

BOS

T-Allen

Finley

Pierce

Garnett

Perkins

14

17

+1

[00:27]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Orl

Nelson

Redick

Barnes

Bass

Howard

23

23

-3

03:11

BOS

T-Allen

Finley

Pierce

Garnett

Wallace

17

20

+3

[00:30]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

02:41

 

Time-out:

Regular

Orlando

Orl 23

BOS 19

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Orl

Nelson

Redick

Barnes

Bass

Gortat

23

24

-1

02:41

BOS

T-Allen

Finley

Pierce

Davis

Wallace

20

22

+1

[00:51]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Orl

Nelson

Redick

Barnes

Lewis

Gortat

24

31

+3

01:50

BOS

T-Allen

Finley

Pierce

Davis

Wallace

22

26

-3

[01:50]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Q2

Orl

Nelson

Redick

Pietrus

Lewis

Howard

31

31

-2

12:00

BOS

T-Allen

Finley

Pierce

Davis

Wallace

26

28

+2

[01:19]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Orl

Nelson

Redick

Pietrus

Lewis

Howard

31

34

+3

10:41

BOS

T-Allen

R-Allen

Finley

Davis

Wallace

28

28

-3

[00:37]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Orl

Williams

Redick

Pietrus

Lewis

Howard

34

34

0

10:04

BOS

Robinson

R-Allen

Finley

Davis

Wallace

28

28

0

[01:01]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Orl

Williams

Redick

Pietrus

Lewis

Howard

34

34

0

09:03

BOS

Robinson

R-Allen

Finley

Davis

Garnett

28

28

0

[00:04]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

08:59

 

Time-out:

Official

 

Orl 34

BOS 28

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Orl

Williams

Redick

Pietrus

Lewis

Howard

34

40

+2

08:59

BOS

Rondo

R-Allen

Finley

Davis

Garnett

28

32

-2

[03:12]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

06:09

 

Time-out:

Regular

Boston

Orl 40

BOS 32

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Orl

Williams

Carter

Pietrus

Bass

Howard

40

41

+1

06:09

BOS

Rondo

R-Allen

Pierce

Garnett

Perkins

32

32

-1

[00:23]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Orl

Nelson

Carter

Pietrus

Bass

Howard

41

43

-3

05:47

BOS

Rondo

R-Allen

Pierce

Garnett

Perkins

32

37

+3

[00:51]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Orl

Nelson

Carter

Barnes

Bass

Howard

43

43

-2

04:56

BOS

Rondo

R-Allen

Pierce

Garnett

Perkins

37

39

+2

[01:36]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Orl

Nelson

Carter

Barnes

Bass

Gortat

43

43

0

03:20

BOS

Rondo

R-Allen

Pierce

Garnett

Perkins

39

39

0

[00:26]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

02:54

 

Time-out:

Regular

Orlando

Orl 43

BOS 39

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Orl

Nelson

Carter

Barnes

Lewis

Gortat

43

43

-1

02:54

BOS

Rondo

R-Allen

Pierce

Garnett

Perkins

39

40

+1

[00:09]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Orl

Nelson

Redick

Barnes

Lewis

Howard

43

48

+2

02:45

BOS

Rondo

R-Allen

Pierce

Garnett

Perkins

40

43

-2

[01:30]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Orl

Nelson

Redick

Pietrus

Lewis

Gortat

48

48

0

01:15

BOS

T-Allen

R-Allen

Pierce

Garnett

Perkins

43

43

0

[00:11]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Orl

Nelson

Redick

Pietrus

Lewis

Gortat

48

51

-1

01:04

BOS

Robinson

R-Allen

Pierce

Garnett

Perkins

43

47

+1

[01:04]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Q3

Orl

Nelson

Carter

Barnes

Lewis

Howard

51

62

-2

12:00

BOS

Rondo

R-Allen

Pierce

Garnett

Perkins

47

60

+2

[06:44]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Orl

Nelson

Redick

Barnes

Bass

Gortat

62

67

+3

05:16

BOS

Rondo

R-Allen

Pierce

Garnett

Perkins

60

62

-3

[01:38]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Orl

Nelson

Redick

Barnes

Bass

Gortat

67

67

-4

03:38

BOS

Rondo

R-Allen

Pierce

Davis

Wallace

62

66

+4

[02:28]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

01:10

 

Time-out:

Regular

Boston

Orl 67

BOS 66

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Orl

Williams

Redick

Pietrus

Bass

Gortat

67

67

-2

01:10

BOS

T-Allen

R-Allen

Pierce

Davis

Wallace

66

68

+2

[00:51]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Orl

Nelson

Redick

Pietrus

Lewis

Gortat

67

67

0

00:19

BOS

T-Allen

R-Allen

Daniels

Davis

Wallace

68

68

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Q4

Orl

Williams

Redick

Pietrus

Lewis

Howard

67

71

+4 *

12:00

BOS

Rondo

R-Allen

T-Allen

Davis

Wallace

68

68

-4

[01:30]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Orl

Williams

Redick

Pietrus

Lewis

Howard

71

71

0

10:30

BOS

Rondo

T-Allen

Pierce

Davis

Wallace

68

68

0

[01:15]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Orl

Williams

Redick

Carter

Lewis

Howard

71

74

+1

09:15

BOS

Rondo

T-Allen

Pierce

Davis

Garnett

68

70

-1

[01:03]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

08:12

 

Time-out:

Official

 

Orl 74

BOS 70

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

08:12

Orl

Nelson

Redick

Carter

Lewis

Howard

74

81

-1

[04:15]

BOS

Rondo

T-Allen

Pierce

Davis

Garnett

70

78

+1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

05:33

 

Time-out:

Regular

Boston

Orl 74

BOS 76

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Orl

Nelson

Redick

Barnes

Lewis

Howard

81

85

-1

03:57

BOS

Rondo

T-Allen

Pierce

Davis

Garnett

78

83

+1

[02:17]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

02:53

 

Time-out:

Regular

Orlando

Orl 81

BOS 78

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

01:40

 

Time-out:

Regular

Orlando

Orl 85

BOS 83

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Orl

Nelson

Redick

Carter

Lewis

Howard

85

86

+1

01:40

BOS

Rondo

T-Allen

Pierce

Davis

Garnett

83

83

-1

[00:11]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Orl

Nelson

Carter

Barnes

Lewis

Howard

86

86

-3

01:29

BOS

Rondo

T-Allen

Pierce

Davis

Garnett

83

86

+3

[00:14]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Orl

Nelson

Redick

Carter

Lewis

Howard

86

86

0

01:15

BOS

Rondo

T-Allen

Pierce

Davis

Garnett

86

86

0

[01:15]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

00:24

 

Time-out:

Short

Orlando

Orl 86

BOS 86

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

OT

Orl

Nelson

Redick

Carter

Lewis

Howard

86

92

+6

05:00

BOS

Rondo

R-Allen

Pierce

Garnett

Perkins

86

86

-6

[03:01]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

01:59

 

Time-out:

Regular

Boston

Orl 92

BOS 86

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Orl

Carter

Pietrus

Barnes

Lewis

Howard

92

92

-3

01:59

BOS

Rondo

R-Allen

Pierce

Davis

Garnett

86

89

+3

[00:13]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

01:46

 

Time-out:

Regular

Orlando

Orl 92

BOS 89

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Orl

Nelson

Redick

Carter

Lewis

Howard

92

94

+2

01:46

BOS

Rondo

R-Allen

Pierce

Davis

Garnett

89

89

-2

[00:16]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Orl

Carter

Pietrus

Barnes

Lewis

Howard

94

94

-3

01:30

BOS

Rondo

R-Allen

Pierce

Garnett

Perkins

89

92

+3

[00:17]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

01:13

 

Time-out:

Short

Orlando

Orl 94

BOS 92

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Orl

Nelson

Redick

Carter

Lewis

Howard

94

96

+2

01:13

BOS

Rondo

R-Allen

Pierce

Garnett

Perkins

92

92

-2

[00:21]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

00:52

 

Time-out:

Short

Boston

Orl 96

Bos 92

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Orl

Nelson

Carter

Barnes

Lewis

Howard

96

96

0

00:52

BOS

Rondo

R-Allen

Pierce

Garnett

Perkins

92

92

0

[00:10]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Orl

Nelson

Redick

Carter

Lewis

Howard

96

96

0

00:42

BOS

Rondo

R-Allen

Pierce

Garnett

Perkins

92

92

0

[00:42]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Orl

Carter

Redick

Pietrus

Lewis

Howard

96

96

0

00:09

BOS

Rondo

R-Allen

Pierce

Garnett

Perkins

92

92

0

LEGEND: * - Technical Foul called on Rasheed Wallace which changed the rhythm of the rest of the game.

4. If SVG continues to implement the series of specific adjustments suggested in this space last week - i.e. see Exhibits A, B, C and D [above] - then the Magic will continue to improve their play as this series progresses.

5. If SVG continues to implement specific “set play offensive system” adjustments … like what was advocated in this space last week:

i. Increased “#1-#5 Pick and Rolls with #4 stationed in the original Weak Side Corner”;

and, what was on display in yesterday’s Game 4:

ii. The introduction of “#1-#4 Pick and Pops with #5 Clean-up Flare Screens for #4″;

iii. The introduction of ”#1-#5 and #4 Staggered Picks and Roll/Pops”;

to create higher quality shot attempts for [a more aggressively "driving and dishing"] Nelson, Howard and Lewis … then the Magic’s scoring output per game will continue to increase as this series progresses.

6. Good-to-great basketball players the world over - and throughout the history of the game - are only as good, or bad … in the playoffs … as their coach is actually capable of putting them into the correct positions to succeed … both, individually and collectively … when matched-up against a high calibre opponent, just as good or better than they are [i.e. in terms of players and coaches]. 

7. This series is still a long way from being over.  :-)

What Doc Rivers has done to create individual match-up advantages vs Orlando

Thursday, May 20th, 2010

Doc Rivers …

By using:

* Only 3 players at the Point Guard and Off Guard positions;

* Only 2 players at the Small Forward position, with 1 of these players also functioning as the team’s Back-up Point Guard; and,

* 4 players at the Power Forward and Center positions;

has developed a tight 8-man rotation for the Celtics:

BOSTON CELTICS

ORLANDO MAGIC

Game

1/MP

2/MP

#

Game

1/MP

2/MP

POINT GUARD and OFF GUARD

Rondo

46

45

1

Nelson

38

38

R-Allen

39

40

2

Carter

41

26

T-Allen

17

15

3

Redick

20

34

 

 

 

4

Williams

10

10

SMALL FORWARD

Pierce

42

40

5

Barnes

15

21

T-Allen

 

 

6

Pietrus

20

16

 

 

 

 

Carter

 

 

POWER FORWARD and CENTER

Garnett

34

35

7

Lewis

42

41

Perkins

26

15

8

Howard

39

40

Davis

15

28

9

Gortat

14

15

Wallace

20

18

 

 

 

 

OTHERS

Robinson

DNP-CD

DNP-CD

10

Johnson

DNP-CD

DNP-CD

Finley

1

5

 

 

 

 

Daniels

DNP-CD

DNP-CD

 

 

 

 

Williams

DNP-CD

 

11

Bass

DNP-CD

DNP-CD

Scalabrine

 

DNP-CD

12

Anderson

DNP-CD

DNP-CD

Score

92

95

 

Score

88

92

which has controlled the individual player match-ups in this series and, in the process, created levels of Team Cohesion and Execution [i.e. Offensively, Defensively, and Rebounding-wise] that are superior to what Orlando has been able to muster.

These two things are what have allowed Boston to establish early leads in both Game 1 and Game 2 and, then, forced Orlando to play catch-up for the balance of those contests.

What Stan Van Gundy needs to do now, in response, in order to counter these advantages, is:

BOSTON CELTICS

ORLANDO MAGIC

#

Game

3/MP

#

Game

3/MP

POINT GUARD and OFF GUARD

1

Rondo

46

1

Nelson

46

2

R-Allen

39

2

Carter

39

3

T-Allen

17

3

Barnes [or Redick or Williams]

17

SMALL FORWARD

4

Pierce

42

4

Pietrus

42

 

T-Allen

 

 

Barnes [or Redick]

 

POWER FORWARD and CENTER

5

Garnett

34

5

Lewis

34

6

Perkins

26

6

Howard [or Gortat]

32

7

Davis

15

7

Gortat [or Bass or Howard]

10

8

Wallace

20

8

Anderson [or Bass]

20

OTHERS

9

Robinson

DNP-CD

9

Williams

DNP-CD

10

Finley

1

10

Redick

1

11

Daniels

DNP-CD

11

Johnson

DNP-CD

12

Williams

DNP-CD

12

Bass

 

13

Scalabrine

 

 

 

 

 

Score

?

 

Score

?

which involves:

* Removing Matt Barnes [SF] from the starting line-up and replacing him with Mickael Pietrus [SF];

* Reducing significantly the minutes played by JJ Redick [OG] and Jason Williams [PG], while increasing the minutes played by Mickael Pietrus [SF];

* Using Vince Carter [OG] as the exclusive match-up vs Ray Allen [OG];

* Using Jameer Nelson [PG] as the exclusive match-up vs Rajon Rondo [PG];

* Having Vince Carter function as Orlando’s Back-up Point Guard, when Jameer Nelson … and, therefore, Rajon Rondo … is off the floor;

* Reducing significantly the minutes played by Rashard Lewis [PF];

* Using Rashard Lewis [PF] as the exclusive match-up vs Kevin Garnett [PF];

* Using either Brandon Bass [PF, or Marcin Gortat, PF/C] as the primary match-up [in addition to Dwight Howard, C] vs Glen Davis [PF]; and,

* Using Ryan Anderson [PF] as the exclusive match-up vs Rasheed Wallace [PF/C];

and would generate the respective Minutes Played [MP] indicated in the chart above for Game 3.

===========================

PS. BTW, those who would suggest that authentically “elite level coaching” makes almost no difference to the way that individual players perform, when it comes to determining “winners from losers,” in the NBA, simply do not understand what the game is all about at the highest levels of competition [e.g. The Celtics would not be leading this series, if Doc Rivers wasn't coaching their team]. 

What Stan Van Gundy needs to do in order to generate open shots for Rashard Lewis

Thursday, May 20th, 2010

In the aftermath of Game 2 …

—————————————————–

Stan Van Gundy will try to get Rashard Lewis more involved offensively

Rashard Lewis Needs to Improve Offensively if the Orlando Magic Want to Challenge the Boston Celtics

—————————————————–

This is now a central topic for discussion, on the part of Magic fans and other NBA observers.

In reality …

The answer is very simple.

———-

Orlando MUST:

1. Stop posting up Dwight Howard on the block.

2. Start using Dwight Howard in repeated ”2/3-5, High Middle, Pick and Roll” situations …

i. With the following players on the court:

Off Guard/#2 - Vince Carter

Center/#5 - Dwight Howard

Point Guard/#1 - Jameer Nelson

Small Forward/#3 - Mickael Pietrus

Power Forward/#4 - Rashard Lewis

ii. Located in the following positions on the court:

Off Guard/#2-Small Forward/#3, as The Ball-handler

Center/#5, as The Pick and Roller 

Point Guard/#1, in The Original Ball Side Corner

Small Forward/#3-Off Guard/#2, at The Original Ball Side Free Throw Line Extended

Power Forward/#4 - in The Original Weak Side Corner

3. Demand that their #2-3’s attack the Hedging Pick Defender, by going around him toward the Original Weak Side of the floor and, then, looking for one of the following options:

a. His own drive to the basket;

b. A lob pass to D-12, for a dunk opportunity;

c. A kickout pass to Rashard Lewis for an uncontested 3PT shot from the corner;

d. A throwback pass to Mickael Pietrus for an uncontested 3PT shot, as he re-locates to the Top Of The Key position [following Howard's roll to the basket];

e. A cross-court skip pass to Jameer Nelson for an uncontested 3PT shot, as he re-locates to the New Weak Side Free Throw Line Extended position.

If Orlando runs this simple set play … this exact way … it will generate, either:

I. Open shots galore for Rashard Lewis;

or,

II. A career night for one of Vincent Lamar Carter, or Mickael Pietrus, as their primary ball-handler.

———-

PS. Hopefully, Stan Van Gundy is paying close attention to what’s written here. :-)

Thus far, Stan Van Gundy is being out-coached by Doc Rivers

Wednesday, May 19th, 2010

Orlando is now down 0-2, heading to Boston for Game 3.

Q1. How come?

Game 1, Box Score

 

PLAYER USAGE, GAME 1

 

Orlando Magic

Boston Celtics

Pos

PLAYER

MP

Pos

PLAYER

MP

STARTERS

PG

OG

Rondo

R-Allen

46

40

PG

OG

Nelson

Carter

38

41

SF

Pierce

42

SF

Barnes

15

PF

C

Garnett

Perkins

34

26

PF

C

Lewis

Howard

42

39

KEY SUBS

G

T-Allen

17

PG

Williams

10

 

 

 

OG

Redick

19

SF

Pietrus

20

PF

Davis

15

 

 

?

?

C

Wallace

20

 

Gortat

14

RESERVES

PG

Robinson

DNP

PG

Johnson

DNP

G/F

G/F

Finley

Daniels

1

DNP

 

 

 

PF

Williams

DNP

PF

Bass

DNP

 

 

 

PF

Anderson

DNP

Game 2, Box Score

 

PLAYER USAGE, GAME 2

 

Orlando Magic

Boston Celtics

Pos

PLAYER

MP

Pos

PLAYER

MP

STARTERS

PG

OG

Rondo

R-Allen

45

39

PG

OG

Nelson

Carter

38

26

SF

Pierce

40

SF

Barnes

21

PF

C

Garnett

Perkins

35

15

PF

C

Lewis

Howard

41

40

KEY SUBS

G

T-Allen

15

PG

Williams

10

 

 

 

OG

Redick

34

SF

Pietrus

16

PF

Davis

28

 

 

?

?

C

Wallace

18

 

Gortat

15

RESERVES

PG

Robinson

DNP

PG

Johnson

DNP

G/F

G/F

Finley

Daniels

5

DNP

 

 

 

PF

Williams

DNP

PF

Bass

DNP

 

 

 

PF

Anderson

DNP

A1. Similar to what happened during Boston’s series vs Cleveland …

Thus far, Doc Rivers is significantly out-coaching his counterpart, in terms of how he is using his personnel to best advantage.

The choice going forward for Stan Van Gundy is actually quite simple:

OPTION 1
Keep doing exactly what the Magic have done to this point … and get swept, by losing 4 straight “close” games to an equally strong and championship calibre opponent;

or,

OPTION 2
Stop giving extended playing time to inferior players like Matt Barnes [SF] and JJ Redick [OG], over someone like Mickael Pietrus [G-F] - who is a much btter all-around player - and stop completely sitting out players like Brandon Bass [PF] and Ryan Anderson [PF], in favour of using only Dwight Howard [C], Rashard Lewis [PF] and Marcin Gortat [C/PF] - in an exclusively ”3 Bigs” rotation - when Boston is going with a “4 Bigs” rotation, involving Garnett [PF], Perkins [C], Davis [PF] and Wallace [C] … and, in the process, turn “close-but-no-cigar” losses into out-right W’s.

This is what the “individual Match-ups” have looked like to this point:

No.

Pos

Orlando Magic

vs

Pos

Boston Celtics

1

PG

Nelson/Williams

à

PG

Rondo

2

OG

Carter/Redick

ß

OG

R-Allen

3

SF

Barnes/Pietrus/Carter

à

SF

Pierce

4

PF

Lewis

=

PF

Garnett

5

C

Howard

ßß

C

Perkins

6

G

Redick

=

G

T-Allen

7

PF

Lewis

à

PF

Davis

8

PF/C

Gortat

à

PF/C

Wallace

9

 

 

=

G/F

Finley

10

PG

Johnson

=

PG

Robinson

11

PG

Bass

=

G/F

Daniels

12

PF/C

Anderson

=

PF/C

Williams/Scalabrine

13

HC

Van Gundy

à

HC

Rivers

 

 

+3

 

 

+5

If, however, SVG shifts to ”individual match-ups” which look like this, instead:

No.

Pos

Orlando Magic

vs

Pos

Boston Celtics

1

PG

Nelson

à

PG

Rondo

2

OG

Carter

ßß

OG

R-Allen

3

SF

Pietrus

à

SF

Pierce

4

PF

Lewis

=

PF

Garnett

5

C

Howard

ßß

C

Perkins

6

G

Barnes/Williams

=

G

T-Allen

7

PF

Bass/Gortat

=

PF

Davis

8

PF/C

Anderson

=

PF/C

Wallace

9

G/F

Redick

=

G/F

Finley

10

PG

Williams/Johnson

=

PG

Robinson

11

PG

Johnson/Barnes

=

G/F

Daniels

12

PF/C

Gortat/Bass

ß

PF/C

Williams/Scalabrine

13

HC

Van Gundy

=

HC

Rivers

 

 

+5

 

 

+2

then, Orlando would still have a have a solid chance to win this series in 7 games.

The choice is up to Stan.

Orlando will win Game 2, if …

Tuesday, May 18th, 2010

If you take a look at the way Doc Rivers and Stan Van Gundy chose to use their players in Game 1 of this series, it should be clear to see what Orlando needs to do this evening in order to head to Boston, for Game 3, tied 1-1:

 

PLAYER USAGE, GAME 1

 

Orlando Magic

Boston Celtics

Pos

PLAYER

MP

Pos

PLAYER

MP

STARTERS

PG

OG

Rondo

R-Allen

46

40

PG

OG

Nelson

Carter

38

41

SF

Pierce

42

SF

Barnes

15

PF

C

Garnett

Perkins

34

26

PF

C

Lewis

Howard

42

39

KEY SUBS

G

T-Allen

17

PG

Williams

10

 

 

 

OG

Redick

19

SF

Pietrus

20

PF

Davis

15

 

 

?

?

C

Wallace

20

 

Gortat

14

RESERVES

PG

Robinson

DNP

PG

Johnson

DNP

G/F

G/F

Finley

Daniels

1

DNP

 

 

 

PF

Williams

DNP

PF

Bass

DNP

 

 

 

PF

Anderson

DNP

BACK-UP GUARD
Although JJ Redick can do an adequate job, defensively, chasing Ray Allen around, using him for 19 minutes against a team like Boston - specifically, at the Off Guard position - significantly reduces Orlando’s overall effectiveness, when it comes to any “help & rotate”, “switch” or “rebounding” situation.

SMALL FORWARD
Matt Barnes, at the best of times, is ill-suited to match-up with an ultra-physical multi-dimensional player like Paul Pierce.

BIGS
Boston has decided to beat on - and beat up - Dwight Howard with a “4 Bigs” rotation of Kevin Garnett, Kendrick Perkins, Glen Davis and Rasheed Wallace. As long as SVG elects to only use a 3-man rotation of D-12, Rashard Lewis and Marcin Gortat, Orlando is going to come out on the short end of positional match-up.

Instead of following this recipe for disaster in Game 2, what Orlando needs to do instead is:

BACK-UP GUARD
Match up Vince Carter vs Ray Allen, almost exclusively; and, then use, either, Jason Williams or JJ Redick vs Tony Allen, but NOT both of them.

SMALL FORWARD
Insert Mickael Pietrus [6-6, 215] into their starting line-up, beside Vince Carter; and, match him up, almost exclusive, with Pierce [6-7, 235].

BIGS
Use D-12 [vs Perkins or Wallace], Rashard Lewis [vs Garnett or Wallace], Marcin Gortat [vs Perkins] and, either, Brandon Bass [vs Davis] or Ryan Anderson [vs Wallace], in a “4 Bigs” rotation.

If SVG and Co. make these adjustments tonight, then, the Magic should be able to even their series with the Celtics … AND cover the number [i.e. -7/-105], in the process.

Coaching, sample sizes and adjustments

Wednesday, April 28th, 2010

3 weeks ago …

You were told in this space that the proper way for the Los Angeles Lakers to solve their problems this season would be to use Kobe Bean Bryant in a specific role:

Solving the Lakers’ problems with the Spurs, Apr 6 2010

Last week …

You were told in this space that the outcome of a playoff series can sometimes be determined by the ability of a team to make the correct game-to-game … and, THEN, in-game … adjustments, based on what its opponent’s specific strengths and weaknesses are and the best possible use of its own personnel:

Making the correct game-to-game adjustments can be THE difference between Winning and Losing in the Playoffs, Apr 23 2010

So much of what can be found on-line today concerning supposedly sound “basketball analysis” is little more than gobbledygook put forth by statistical gurus without a proper understanding of, 

How the NBA game actually works.”

===================================

Oklahoma City Thunder 87
LOS ANGELES LAKERS 111
Complete Series Info

 

===================================

The fact is …

1. Sample sizes are rendered virtually meaningless;

2. League-wide averages are rendered virtually meaningless; and,

3. Creating and minimizing individual mis-matches against the best teams in the league - and a particular opponent of high calibre - are absolutely crucial;

 … when it comes to determining accurately which teams, coaches and, therefore, players will advance in the playoffs, or not.

====================================

During the pre-season …

You were told in this space that the 2009-2010 NBA championship would, in all likelihood, be won by 1 of the following 5 teams:

EASTERN CONFERENCE
Orlando Magic
Cleveland Cavaliers
Boston Celtics [i.e. depending upon the recovery of Kevin Garnett from injury]

WESTERN CONFERENCE
Los Angeles Lakers
San Antonio Spurs

Nothing which has happened since that time has fundamentally changed that perception. 

Right now …

The 4 best teams in the Eastern Conference are the Cleveland Cavaliers [4-1], Orlando Magic [4-0], Boston Celtics [4-1] and Atlanta Hawks [2-2].

The 4 best teams in the Western Conference are the Los Angeles Lakers [3-2], San Antonio Spurs [3-2], Utah Jazz [3-1] and Phoenix Suns [3-2].

===================================

Barring any further major injuries …

This year’s NBA champions will, in all likelihood, be 1 of the following 3 teams:

Los Angeles Lakers, Phil Jackson [and Mitch Kupchak and Dr. Jerry Buss]
Orlando Magic, Stan Van Gundy [and Otis Smith and Richard DeVos]
San Antonio Spurs, Gregg Popovich [and RC Buford and Peter Holt]

… none of which happens to be the Cleveland Cavaliers with Mike Brown [and Danny Ferry and Daniel Gilbert].

Basketball is the ultimate TEAM Sport … with each player on the court having to be able to function adequately on Offense, on Defense, and in terms of Rebounding, in conjunction with the sound strategic and tactical decision-making skills of an elite level head coach, general manager and owner.

Those who think that basketball can be properly understood by examining the statistical norms, averages, outliers, etc., associated with representative “sample sizes”, “numerical formulas”, and all manner of “efficiency ratings,” are simply wasting their [and your] time.

Basketball is a game of:

I. Acumen;

and,

II. Inches;

… the most important of which are the “approximately 6″ located between the ears of a team’s owner, general manager, head coach and 8-9 regular rotation players.

Related:

Kobe Bryant, Closer to the ground

Every Move Must Have A Purpose

Fixing what is actually wrong with the Orlando Magic

Wednesday, January 20th, 2010

Although plenty of other NBA observers have expressed their concerns regarding the current performance of the Orlando Magic …

A Quantitative Look at the Orlando Magic’s Four All-Stars

Orlando Magic News for January 19th: Sobering Assessments of Orlando’s Season Abound at the Halfway Mark

much of what’s been said to-date misses the mark completely, when it comes to diagnosing accurately:

#1. What’s been going on with Orlando in the last month [or so]?

and,

#2. What specific remedies the Magic will need to implement, in order to make their problems disappear for the balance of this season? 

There are five simple [inter-related] player personnel moves which Stan Van Gundy needs to implement that will cure what is ailing the Orlando Magic at the moment:

1. Replace Jason Williams with Anthony Johnson as the exclusive primary Back-up Point Guard to Jameer Nelson.

2. Remove Matt Barnes from the regular rotation.

3. Shift Rashard Lewis into the Starting Small Forward position.

4. Shift Ryan Anderson into the Starting Power Forward position.

5. Use Brandon Bass in the Back-up Power Forward position.

What these five specific changes would do, in effect, is create a regular rotation which features the following Start Five:

Jameer Nelson, PG
Vince Carter, OG
Rashard Lewis, SF
Ryan Anderson, PF
Dwight Howard, C

in conjunction with the following set of Key Subs off the bench:

Anthony Johnson, PG
JJ Redick, OG
Mickael Pietrus, SF
Brandon Bass, PF 
Marcin Gortat, C

and the following list of Reserves/Extras/Outs:

Jason Williams, PG
Matt Barnes, SF
Adonal Foyle, C

Move #1
With a healthy Jameer Nelson [PG] in their everyday line-up, an erratic player like Jason Williams [PG] is not the right fit with their team, in a primary back-up role, in comparison with a more consistent player like Anthony Johnson [who is a much better defender and rebounder than J-Wil, at this stage of their respective careers].

Game Log for Anthony Johnson in Orlando’s Last 13 Games

Regular Season

FG

3PT

FT

Rebounds

Misc

 Date

Opponent

Score

GS

Min

 

M

A

Pct

 

M

A

Pct

 

M

A

Pct

 

O

D

T

 

Ast

TO

Stl

Blk

PF

Pts

 Jan 18

@ LAL

L 92-98

0

0

 

0

0

N/A

 

0

0

N/A

 

0

0

N/A

 

0

0

0

 

0

0

0

0

0

0

 Jan 15

@ POR

L 87-102

0

0

 

0

0

N/A

 

0

0

N/A

 

0

0

N/A

 

0

0

0

 

0

0

0

0

0

0

 Jan 13

@ DEN

L 97-115

0

06:23

 

1

2

50.0

 

1

1

100.0

 

0

0

N/A

 

0

1

1

 

0

0

0

0

0

3

 Jan 12

@ SAC

W 109-88

0

0

 

0

0

N/A

 

0

0

N/A

 

0

0

N/A

 

0

0

0

 

0

0

0

0

0

0

 Jan 9

ATL

W 113-81

0

0

 

0

0

N/A

 

0

0

N/A

 

0

0

N/A

 

0

0

0

 

0

0

0

0

0

0

 Jan 8

@ WAS

L 97-104

0

0

 

0

0

N/A

 

0

0

N/A

 

0

0

N/A

 

0

0

0

 

0

0

0

0

0

0

 Jan 6

TOR

L 103-108

0

0

 

0

0

N/A

 

0

0

N/A

 

0

0

N/A

 

0

0

0

 

0

0

0

0

0

0

 Jan 5

@ IND

L 90-97

0

0

 

0

0

N/A

 

0

0

N/A

 

0

0

N/A

 

0

0

0

 

0

0

0

0

0

0

 Jan 2

@ CHI

L 93-101

0

0

 

0

0

N/A

 

0

0

N/A

 

0

0

N/A

 

0

0

0

 

0

0

0

0

0

0

 Jan 1

@ MIN

W 106-94

0

0

 

0

0

N/A

 

0

0

N/A

 

0

0

N/A

 

0

0

0

 

0

0

0

0

0

0

 Date

Opponent

Score

GS

Min

 

M

A

Pct

 

M

A

Pct

 

M

A

Pct

 

O

D

T

 

Ast

TO

Stl

Blk

PF

Pts

 Dec 30

MIL

W 117-92

0

0

 

0

0

N/A

 

0

0

N/A

 

0

0

N/A

 

0

0

0

 

0

0

0

0

0

0

 Dec 25

BOS

L 77-86

0

0

 

0

0

N/A

 

0

0

N/A

 

0

0

N/A

 

0

0

0

 

0

0

0

0

0

0

 Dec 23

HOU

W 102-87

0

0

 

0

0

N/A

 

0

0

N/A

 

0

0

N/A

 

0

0

0

 

0

0

0

0

0

0

 

W-L

5-8

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Game Log for Anthony Johnson when playing +10:00

Regular Season

FG

3PT

FT

Rebounds

Misc

 Date

Opponent

Score

GS

Min

 

M

A

Pct

 

M

A

Pct

 

M

A

Pct

 

O

D

T

 

Ast

TO

Stl

Blk

PF

Pts

 Dec 21

UTH

W 104-99

0

12:00

 

1

2

50.0

 

0

1

0.0

 

2

2

100.0

 

0

2

2

 

2

2

0

0

3

4

 Dec 19

POR

W 92-83

0

25:15

 

3

10

30.0

 

1

4

25.0

 

2

2

100.0

 

0

6

6

 

3

3

4

0

2

9

 Dec 17

@ MIA

L 86-104

0

24:12

 

2

6

33.3

 

1

2

50.0

 

0

0

N/A

 

0

1

1

 

5

2

1

0

4

5

 Dec 16

TOR

W 118-99

0

24:46

 

5

9

55.6

 

1

3

33.3

 

2

2

100.0

 

1

1

2

 

4

3

0

0

0

13

 Dec 14

IND

W 106-98

0

27:14

 

6

11

54.6

 

1

3

33.3

 

0

0

N/A

 

1

3

4

 

7

1

1

1

1

13

 Dec 11

@ PHO

L 103-106

0

19:54

 

4

10

40.0

 

1

3

33.3

 

2

2

100.0

 

0

1

1

 

2

1

1

0

4

11

 Dec 10

@ UTH

L 111-120

0

11:48

 

1

2

50.0

 

0

1

0.0

 

2

2

100.0

 

0

1

1

 

1

1

0

0

1

4

 Dec 8

@ LAC

W 97-86

0

21:46

 

2

4

50.0

 

1

2

50.0

 

1

2

50.0

 

0

4

4

 

4

2

1

0

0

6

 Dec 5

@ GSW

W 126-118

0

11:22

 

2

4

50.0

 

1

2

50.0

 

0

0

N/A

 

0

0

0

 

1

0

0

0

1

5

 Dec 2

NYK

W 118-104

0

21:16

 

1

2

50.0

 

0

1

0.0

 

0

0

N/A

 

1

5

6

 

4

0

0

0

0

2

 Date

Opponent

Score

GS

Min

 

M

A

Pct

 

M

A

Pct

 

M

A

Pct

 

Off

Def

Tot

 

Ast

TO

Stl

Blk

PF

Pts

 Nov 29

@ NYK

W 114-102

0

11:36

 

1

3

33.3

 

0

1

0.0

 

0

0

N/A

 

0

1

1

 

2

1

0

0

2

2

 Nov 28

@ MIL

W 100-98

0

13:05

 

1

3

33.3

 

1

1

100.0

 

0

0

N/A

 

0

0

0

 

0

0

0

0

1

3

 Nov 26

@ ATL

W 93-76

0

21:08

 

6

10

60.0

 

3

5

60.0

 

2

2

100.0

 

1

1

2

 

3

0

0

0

2

17

 Nov 20

@ BOS

W 83-78

0

14:52

 

0

3

0.0

 

0

1

0.0

 

0

0

N/A

 

1

3

4

 

3

3

0

0

0

0

 Nov 18

OKC

W 108-94

0

19:30

 

4

7

57.1

 

1

3

33.3

 

0

0

N/A

 

0

1

1

 

4

2

0

0

1

9

 Nov 1

@ TOR

W 125-116

0

11:17

 

1

1

100.0

 

0

0

N/A

 

2

2

100.0

 

0

0

0

 

3

0

0

0

0

4

 

W-L

13-3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Move #2
Although Matt Barnes [6-7, 226] has proved to be an energetic player over the course of his NBA career, right now he is not a “good fit” with the Magic, given his specific skill-set [i.e. 3FG%=28.6; Ast:TO=1.0] and considering the other guards and forwards on their roster.

Move #3
Using a player like Rashard Lewis [6-10, 230] at the Starting SF position makes the Magic bigger at this spot … i.e. compared with Matt Barnes [6-7, 226] … while still retaining their collective ability to shoot the ball effectively from the perimeter [i.e. 3FG%=39.5] and make good decisions [i.e. Ast:TO=1.0] around a center-piece like Dwight Howard.

This move would then allow Mickael Pietrus to flourish, by providing Orlando with a much better scorer and defender coming off the bench, at this key swing position, instead of Matt Barnes.

Move #4
Ryan Anderson is a solid low-maintenance perimeter shooting Big Man who can stretch defense around D-12 and defend adequately: [i] on the perimeter against smaller players, and [ii] in the post against non-behemoth Power Forwards and Centers.

Move #5
Brandon Bass is an under-sized Power Forward who, on offense, works well in the mid-range area [i.e. FG%=53.1] and is able to hold his ground, defensively, and in terms of rebounding, against any Back-up PF. Unfortunately, to this point in the season, he is being wasted on the Magic’s bench with a series of DNPs.

—————————–

Magic Remedy, Part 1

If Stan Van Gundy makes these specific personnel adjustments Orlando will finish in 1 of the top 4 positions in the Eastern Conference, once again, and advance to the East Finals, against Boston or Cleveland or Atlanta or Miami, with a solid shot at returning to the NBA Finals this season. 

Magic Remedy, Part II

What Stan Van Gundy also needs to do, however, is return to being the curmudgeon he has always been, not the giant “teddy bear” he has morphed into recently, in the aftermath of Dwight Howard’s request to “lighten up” on his routinely harsh criticism of his own team/players.

If Stan chooses to continue on his current path, then, Orlando will have very little chance of besting Boston, Cleveland, Atlanta or Miami in the playoffs this season.

This is not the sort of team that Stan Van Gundy can afford to “go soft on”.

In praise of Otis Smith

Monday, December 14th, 2009

Which team[s] made out the best from the 4-team trade … between Toronto, Dallas, Memphis and Orlando … this past summer?

Rick Kamla gets it right.