Posts Tagged ‘Roko Ukic’

Up, down, or approximately where they are right now

Wednesday, December 16th, 2009

With last night’s 16th loss of the season …

Toronto Raptors 95
MIAMI HEAT 115
Game Summary

the most important question for the Toronto Raptors is:

Q1. Should this team, as constructed, be expected to improve substantially over the course of the next 55 games, or not?

A1. Well …

PART ONE

This is what the Eastern Conference standings look like today:

Eastern W L PCT GB CONF DIV HOME ROAD L 10 STREAK
Boston1 20 4 0.833 0.0 13-3 5-0 8-3 12-1 10-0 W 11
Orlando2 18 6 0.750 2.0 14-3 3-1 8-2 10-4 7-3 W 1
Atlanta3 17 6 0.739 2.5 10-4 2-2 10-2 7-4 6-4 W 4
Cleveland4 18 7 0.720 2.5 11-5 4-1 10-2 8-5 7-3 W 3
Miami5 12 11 0.522 7.5 8-5 3-2 7-7 5-4 4-6 W 1
Milwaukee6 11 11 0.500 8.0 6-7 2-3 9-3 2-8 3-7 W 2
Detroit7 11 13 0.458 9.0 8-5 1-3 8-4 3-9 6-4 L 1
Charlotte8 10 13 0.435 9.5 9-10 2-2 9-3 1-10 6-4 W 1
Toronto 11 16 0.407 10.5 7-9 0-1 7-5 4-11 4-6 L 1
Indiana 8 14 0.364 11.0 6-7 0-1 5-6 3-8 3-7 L 1
Chicago 8 15 0.348 11.5 5-9 3-2 6-5 2-10 2-8 L 2
New York 8 16 0.333 12.0 4-11 2-2 4-8 4-8 5-5 L 1
Washington 7 15 0.318 12.0 6-11 1-4 4-7 3-8 4-6 L 5
Philadelphia 6 18 0.250 14.0 5-10 3-2 4-8 2-10 1-9 W 1
New Jersey 2 23 0.080 18.5 2-15 0-5 1-8 1-15 2-8 L 4

PART TWO

As of Fri Dec 11 2009, this is what the Strength Of Schedule [SOS] looked like for the teams in the East:

Team

SOS Rk

Boston 1

28

Orlando 2

22

Atlanta 3

15

Cleveland 4

27

Miami 5

9

Milwaukee 6

26

Detroit 7

4

Charlotte 8

17

Toronto

16

Indiana

20

Chicago

3

New York

5

Washington

10

Philadelphia

6

New Jersey

18

PART THREE

Looking at the injury situation for the Raptors and the other teams around them in the standings:

Team

Significant Player Loss To Injury

Milwaukee 6

M-Redd [A]

Detroit 7

R-Hamilton [A]; T-Prince [C]; B-Gordon [B]; W-Bynum [B]

Charlotte 8

None

Toronto

J-Calderon [B]; R-Evans [C]

Indiana

M-Dunleavy [A]; D-Granger [C]

Chicago

T-Thomas [C]

New York

None

Washington

A-Jamison [A]

Philadelphia

L-Williams [C]

Legend: A – Missed games earlier in the season; B – Missed recent games; C – On-going absence.

PART FOUR

For all practical intents and purposes:

Team

Expectations Moving Forward, Relative To The Raptors

Milwaukee 6

Struggle to maintain present position

Detroit 7

Maintain present position

Charlotte 8

Maintain present position, if remain injury-free

Toronto

 

Indiana

Improve upon present position, if D-Granger returns

Chicago

Improve upon present position, if T-Thomas returns

New York

Improve upon present position, if remain injury-free

Washington

Improve upon present position, if remain injury-free

Philadelphia

Improve upon present position, if L-Williams returns

PART FIVE

As has been said in this corner, since the 2009 NBA Draft took place …

when the Raptors chose not to trade down from the No. 9 position [overall], in an effort to re-invigorate their squad with:

* An additional NBA-calibre player obtained in a trade down

* The lower 1st Round pick they could have obtained in a trade down, which could have been used to acquire an in-coming player like Brandon Jennings, or Terrence Williams, or Earl Clark, or Rodrigue Beaubois, or Taj Gibson

* The lower 1st Round pick they could have bought with their $3.0 M ‘draft voucher’ obtained in their trade with the Miami Heat, which they could have used to acquire a player like Taj Gibson, or DeJuan Blair, or Derrick Brown, or Dante Cunningham, or Sam Young, or Marcus Thornton, or Nando De Colo

or

The upper 2nd Round pick they could have obtained in a trade down, if a lower 1st Round Pick was not available, with which they could have acquired an in-coming player like DeJaun Blair, or Derrick Brown, or Dante Cunningham, or Marcus Thornton, or Nando De Colo

and the decisons were made by Bryan Colangelo:

1 To not re-sign Shawn Marion for the dollar amount required to retain his services;

2 To not re-sign their own unrestricted free agents [i.e. Anthony Parker and Joey Graham];

3 To sign Jay Triano [then, interim head coach] to a 3-yr contract extension;

4 To complete the series of trades which then ensued with Orlando, Dallas, Golden State and Milwaukee, in effect, exchanging the following players on the team’s 2008-2009 roster with their corresponding counterparts [i.e. coded by colour] on the current version:

2008-2009

2009-2010

Calderon

Calderon

Parker

DeRozan

Marion

Turkoglu

Bosh

Bosh

Bargnani

Bargnani

Ukic

Jack

Kapono

Belinelli

Graham

Wright

Humphries

Johnson

Voskuhl

Nesterovic

Banks

Banks

Douby

Weems

M-Bonsu

M-Bonsu

Jawai

Evans

O’Bryant

O’Bryant

… that actually did little overall to substantially improve the Quality Depth on their team, despite what the fanbase was originally led to believe by the Raptors’ Management Team and assorted NBA “observers” who extolled the influx of supposed “talent” associated with these new additions to the roster …

this year’s Raptors team is no better than a number of other middle-of-the- pack outfits in the Eastern Conference and, in fact, should be expected to struggle to make the playoffs this season.

Those who thought/think that this edition of the Toronto Raptors has UNDER-ACHIEVED, to this point, this season …

Play Audio

Now

were/are fundamentally INCORRECT.

This is precisely WHO and WHAT the Raptors are, and approximately WHERE the 2009-2010 version of their team SHOULD BE expected to finish this season, based on the personnel [i.e. players and coaches] on its roster.

Where would the Raptors be today, if …

Saturday, December 12th, 2009

Following last night’s deflating home loss to the Atlanta Hawks, the conference standings in the East look like this:

Eastern W L PCT GB CONF DIV HOME ROAD L 10 STREAK
Boston1 18 4 0.818 0.0 12-3 5-0 8-3 10-1 9-1 W 9
Orlando2 17 6 0.739 1.5 13-3 3-1 7-2 10-4 7-3 L 2
Atlanta3 16 6 0.727 2.0 9-4 2-2 9-2 7-4 6-4 W 3
Cleveland4 16 7 0.696 2.5 10-5 4-1 9-2 7-5 7-3 W 1
Miami5 11 10 0.524 6.5 7-5 3-2 6-6 5-4 4-6 L 1
Milwaukee6 10 11 0.476 7.5 6-7 2-3 8-3 2-8 2-8 W 1
Detroit7 10 12 0.455 8.0 8-5 1-3 7-4 3-8 5-5 W 4
Charlotte8 9 12 0.429 8.5 8-10 2-2 8-3 1-9 6-4 L 1
Toronto 10 15 0.400 9.5 7-8 0-1 6-5 4-10 3-7 L 2
Chicago 8 13 0.381 9.5 5-8 3-2 6-3 2-10 2-8 W 1
Indiana 7 13 0.350 10.0 5-6 0-1 5-6 2-7 2-8 W 1
Washington 7 13 0.350 10.0 6-10 1-4 4-6 3-7 4-6 L 3
New York 8 15 0.348 10.5 4-10 2-2 4-8 4-7 5-5 W 4
Philadelphia 5 18 0.217 13.5 5-10 3-2 3-8 2-10 0-10 L 12
New Jersey 2 21 0.087 16.5 2-13 0-5 1-8 1-13 2-8 L 2

Prior to the 2009 NBA Draft, however, these were some of the players who were recommended in this space for the Toronto Raptors:

Terrence Williams [OG-SF, New Jersey, 1st Rd]
Earl Clark [SF-PF, Phoenix, 1st Rd]
Derrick Brown [SF-PF, Charlotte, 2nd Rd]
Taj Gibson [PF, Chicago, 1st Rd]
Dante Cunningham [PF, Portland, 2nd Rd]
Marcus Thornton [OG, New Orleans, via Miami, 2nd Rd]
Nando De Colo [OG-SF, San Antonio, 2nd Rd]

Prior to the 4-team trade that involved the Raptors, Magic, Mavericks and Grizzlies, it was also suggested here that Toronto should:

1. Trade Jason Kapono.

2. Either: A. Re-sign Shawn Marion; or, B. Let him walk away, as an UFA.
3. Retain the services of their own Free Agents.
4. Retain the services of useful still-young players like Kris Humphries and Roko Ukic.
5. Retain the services of an experienced, NBA proven and successful head coach who prioritizes Team Defense and Rebounding.

6. Obtain the services of a cost-effective veteran Back-up Point Guard, Combination Off Guard/Small Forward, and Center.

If the Raptors would have followed those recommendations, instead of:

1. Drafting DeMar DeRozan [No. 9, overall]; and,
2. Acquiring the services of Hedo Turkoglu, Jarrett Jack, Antoine Wright, Marco Belinelli, Amir Johnson and Sonny Weems; and,
3. Giving Jay Triano a contract extension.

culminating with a roster that looks like the middle column in the following chart:

TORONTO RAPTORS ROSTER

Role

End 2008-2009

Suggested 2009-2010

Current 2009-2010

STARTERS

1

Jose Calderon

Jose Calderon *

Jose Calderon *

2

Anthony Parker

Anthony Parker *

DeMar DeRozan

3

Shawn Marion

Jamario Moon **

Hedo Turkoglu

4

Chris Bosh

Shawn Marion *

Chris Bosh *

5

Andrea Bargnani

Chris Bosh *

Andrea Bargnani [CE] *

KEY SUBS

6

Roko Ukic

Earl Watson

Jarrett Jack

7

Jason Kapono

Marcus Thornton

Marco Belinelli

8

Joey Graham

Derrick Brown

Antoine Wright

9

Kris Humphries

Kris Humphries *

Reggie Evans

10

Jake Voskuhl

Andrea Bargnani *

Rasho Nesterovic **

RESERVES

11

Quincy Douby

Roko Ukic *

Sonny Weems

12

Pops Mensah-Bonsu

Reggie Evans

Amir Johnson

OTHERS

13

Marcus Banks

Marcus Banks *

Marcus Banks *

14

Nathan Jawai

Joey Graham *

Pops Mensah-Bonsu *

15

Patrick O’Bryant

Rasho Nesterovic **

Patrick O’Bryant *

HC

Jay Triano

Jeff Van Gundy or Avery Johnson

Jay Triano [CE] *

Legend: HC – Head Coach; * - Played with team previous season; ** - Played for Raptors before; UFA – Unrestricted Free Agent; RFA – Restricted Free Agent; Blue – UFA, retained; Purple – RFA, re-acquired; Green – UFA, acquired; Red – 2009 Draft Pick; Orange – Acquired via trade; Brown – RFA, acquired; Turquoise – Signed new head coach; CE – Contract Extension.

————————————————————
 

Would the Raptors have a .500+ W-L Record today, and an improved opportunity to re-sign Chris Bosh [UFA] this coming summer?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

————————————————————

Yours truly thinks they would.

It’s by developing and then implementing a sound Basketball Philosophy … which emphasizes the importance of [I] Team Defense, [II] Rebounding, and [III] Shared Team Offense, in this order … maintaining general roster stability, from one season to the next, while acquiring Quality Depth, and obtaining the services of an experienced and successful NBA head coach, that the Raptors would be able to fundamentally alter the direction of their franchise and construct the type of championship-calibre organization which UFA’s like Chris Bosh, Joe Johnson, Dwyane Wade, and LeBron James, etc., would willingly CHOOSE to play for, if they have their druthers, either, this coming off season or further down-the-road.

Two ships passing in the night, in Raptorville

Thursday, December 10th, 2009

The word “benchmark” has the following definition:

bench·mark (bnchmärk)

n.
1. A standard by which something can be measured or judged: “Inflation . . . is a great distorter of seemingly fixed economic ideas and benchmarks” (Benjamin M. Friedman). See Synonyms at standard.
2. often bench mark A surveyor’s mark made on a stationary object of previously determined position and elevation and used as a reference point in tidal observations and surveys.
tr.v. bench·marked, bench·mark·ing, bench·marks
To measure (a rival’s product) according to specified standards in order to compare it with and improve one’s own product.

As was mentioned yesterday, last night’s contest between Toronto and Milwaukee should have been viewed by each team as a pivotal game, and an early season barometer for where their respective franchise stands in relation to the other middle-of-the-pack squads in the Eastern Conference.

Toronto Raptors 95
MILWAUKEE BUCKS 117
Complete Game Summary

By no means should the Bucks be viewed as an ideal, or even an up-and-coming, franchise in the NBA, at this point in time. Milwaukee has:

- a talented, young Starting-calibre PG
- a defensively stout young Starting-calibre SF-PF 
- an all-around solid Starting-calibre C

who they can build around moving forward …

- a solid, experienced, head coach

who they can build with moving forward … and,

- a dead-weight former “franchise player”

who is no longer a major part of their team with a fairly hefty contract that is due to expire in just 2 years

- a slew of good-but-still-far-from-being-very-good back-up players on their roster

who they can use to fill in the gaps, while hoping to field a highly competitive team, on an annual basis …

and, then, prescious little more than that.

Yet, last night, playing their 3rd game in 4 nights, after losing 8 of their previous 9 games … they were still able to dismantle the Raptors on the strength of [a] Brandon Jennings first-half scoring exploits, [b] solid team defense, and [c] individual offensive contributions from a host of different back-up players [e.g. Ersan Ilyasova , 17 pts; Roko Ukic, 17 pts; Carlos Delfino, 14 pts; Luke Ridnour, 15 pts].

Raptors fans who thought that their team’s recent 3-game winning streak was an authentic indication of a “righted ship”, heading toward the upper-middle region of the conference standings, sometime soon, were simply being delusional, once again. 

The road victory over Washington [7-12/.368, 10th/EC] was an overtime decision that could have gone either way at the end of regulation and at the final buzzer when Gilbert Arenas inexplicably missed an open lay-up.

The road victory over Chicago [7-13/.350, 11th/EC] was a relatively meaningless encounter against an opponent that is currently in free-fall … coping with [I] debilitating injuries to 2 key rotation players, both of whom are solid defender/rebounders, at their respective positions, and [II] the loss of their leading scorer from last season [i.e. Ben Gordon, who was not retained, as an UFA, this past summer].

The home victory over Minnesota [3-19/.136; 15th/WC] was secured in the final 90 seconds, when a 3PT shot from Antoine Wright [3FG% = 30.2] found the bottom of the net to push the Raptors’ precarious lead from 2 to 5 points.

On the other hand, last night’s game against the Bucks was a different beast entirely.

The Bucks were looking ahead at their next 3 opponents … i.e. vs the Blazers, vs the Lakers and @ the Cavaliers … and not liking what they saw, at all.

The Bucks are a solid middle-of-the-pack team this season:

[Ratings as of Mon Dec 05, 2009]

 

Match-up

PDR

PAR

RDR

QR

QIR

Raptors

20

29

17

66

23

WIZARDS

21

19

15

55

20

 

Match-up

PDR

PAR

RDR

QR

QIR

Raptors

20

29

17

66

23

BULLS

28

13

23

64

22

 

Match-up

PDR

PAR

RDR

QR

QIR

T-wolves

30

24

25

79

28

RAPTORS

20

29

17

66

23

 

Match-up

PDR

PAR

RDR

QR

QIR

Raptors

20

29

17

66

23

BUCKS

15

17

22

54

19

In last night’s game, key [revealing?] stats included:

STATS

Raptors

BUCKS

Points

95

117

FGA

68

80

TO

13

9

FTA

33

28

FTA * .44

15

12

Poss

96

101

TSV

181

209

Pts/TSV

0.525

0.560

Pts/Poss

0.990

1.158

Legend: FGA – Field Goal Attempts; TO – Turnovers; FTA – Free Throw Attempts; Poss – Possessions; TSV – Total Shot Value; Pts/TSV – Points per Total Shot Value; Pts/Poss – Points per Possession.

When an opponent converts 3.5% more of its Total Shot Value, creates 5 more Possessions and a Points per Possession differential of 0.168, it indicates that your team was out-classed in a number of different ways.  

1/4 of the way through the regular season schedule, what should now be a legit concern for the Raptors organization, and its fanbase, is what you see when you look at the following two charts; appraising [i] where these two teams were last night:

RAPTORS, 9th

W-L, 10-14/.417

Current Streak, L1

Last

Night

Adv

BUCKS, 6th

W-L, 10-11/.476

Current Streak, W1

Starters

Jack

à

Jennings

DeRozan

0

Delfino

Turkoglu

0

Mbah A Moute

Nesterovic

à

Bogut

Bosh

ß

Ilyasova

Key Subs

Banks

à

Ridnour

Belinelli

0

Ukic

Wright

0

Meeks

Johnson

0

Warrick

Reserves

Weems

0

Bell

Mensah-Bonsu

à

Thomas

O’Bryant

à

Gadzuric

Extras/Out

Calderon-inj.

ß

Redd-inj.

Evans-inj.

ß

Alexander

Bargnani-inj.

ß

Elson

Head Coach

Jay Triano

à

Scott Skiles

General Manager

Bryan Colangelo

0

John Hammond

Owner

MLSE

0

Herb Kohl

+4

Total

+6

and, then, [ii] where it looks as though they might be headed in the immediate future:

RAPTORS, 9th

W-L, 10-14/.417

Current Streak, L1

Future

Adv

BUCKS, 6th

W-L, 10-11/.476

Current Streak, W1

Starters

Calderon

à

Jennings

DeRozan

ß

Delfino

Turkoglu

à

Mbah A Moute

Bosh [UFA, 2010]

ß

Ilyasova

Bargnani

0

Bogut

Key Subs

Jack

0

Ridnour

Belinelli

0

Redd [UFA, 2011]

Wright

à

Meeks

Johnson

0

Warrick

Reserves

Weems

0

Bell

Evans

à

Thomas

Nesterovic

à

Gadzuric

Extras/Out

Banks

à

Ukic

Mensah-Bonsu

0

Alexander

O’Bryant

à

Elson

Head Coach

Jay Triano

à

Scott Skiles

General Manager

Bryan Colangelo

0

John Hammond

Owner

MLSE

0

Herb Kohl

+2

Total

+8

When the 2009-2010 off-season arrives and Chris Bosh sits down to evaluate where his chances might be the best to effectively challenge for a future NBA championship, realistically, do you think that he is going to perceive the Toronto Raptors as the No. 1 place for him to accomplish this goal in the no-too-distant future?

A team which might even be considered as beneath the decidedly “average” Milwaukee Bucks on the authentic depth chart in the East this season?

The Raptors next 4 games are:

Fri Dec 11 vs Atlanta [QR = 30; QIR = 9]
Sun Dec 13 vs Houston [QR = 42; QIR = T-13]
Tue Dec 15 @ MIAMI [QR = 42; QIR = T-13]
Wed Dec 16 @ ORLANDO [QR = 17; QIR = 2]

Legend: QR – Quality Rating [PDR/Points Differential Rank + PAR/Points Allowed Rank + RDR/Rebounding Differential Rank]; QIR – Quality Index Ranking [#1-30]; as of Sun Dec 06.

When assessing the relative strength of these 4 opponents, it’s imperative that the Raptors [10-14] get their act together quickly, substantially improve their Team Defense, and win their up-coming 2 home games … or, face the very real possibility of amassing another extended losing streak [i.e. a 5-gamer this time] and an inauspicious W-L Record [10-18?].

What Toronto has done so far this season is no way to go about convincing Chris Bosh that he should actually re-sign with the Raptors, as one of the premier unrestricted free agents in 2010.

To paraphrase something once said by Yogi Berra, noted philosopher :-) :

“Sometimes, it really does get late early out there … in the process of pursuing one’s own UFA.”

The Raptors would do well to not forget that Life Truism this season. 

Source of Raptors’ on-going defensive problems

Tuesday, December 1st, 2009

Last season the Raptors finished 4th in the Atlantic Division and 13th, overall, in the Eastern Conference [i.e. 33-49/402].

Offensively, they scored 99.0 Points Per Game [16th in the NBA].
Defensively, they allowed 101.9 Points Per Game [20th in the NBA].
In terms of Points Scored Differential, they finished with a Per Game mark of -2.9 [23rd in the NBA].  
In terms of Rebounding Differential, they finished with a Per Game mark of -1.5 [22nd in the NBA].

Thus far, this season, Toronto is:

* 2nd in the Atlantic Division and 10th, overall, in the Eastern Conference [i.e. 7-11/.389];

* 4th in Points Scored Per Game [104.9]

* 29th in Points Allowed Per Game [109.4]

* 23rd in Points Scored Differential Per Game [-4.4]

* 20th in Rebounding Differential Per Game [-0.4] 

How much is the roster really improved for the 2009-2010 Toronto Raptors, compared with the 2008-2009 version?

Role

2008-2009

2009-2010

’09-10 COMPARISON

OFF

DEF

REB

TOT

COACHES

Head

S-Mitchell

J-Triano

+

-

0

0

Assistant

M-Evans

M-Iavaroni

?

-

+

0

Assistant

A-English

A-English

0

0

0

0

Assistant

J-Triano

M-Nori

?

?

?

?

STARTERS

1

J-Calderon

J-Calderon

0

0

0

0

2

A-Parker

D-DeRozan

0

-

0

-

3

S-Marion

H-Turkoglu

+

-,-

-

-

4

C-Bosh

C-Bosh

+

0

+

+

5

A-Bargnani

A-Bargnani

+

0

+

+

KEY SUBS

6

R-Ukic

J-Jack

+

0

0

+

7

J-Kapono

M-Belinelli

0

0

0

0

8

J-Graham

A-Wright

0

0

0

0

9

P-M-Bonsu

A-Johnson

0

0

0

0

10

J-Voskuhl

R-Nesterovic

+

0

+

+

RESERVES

11

M-Banks

S-Weems

+

+

+

+

12

P-O’Bryant

P-M-Bonsu

0

0

+

+

EXTRAS/OUT

13

Q-Douby

M-Banks

0

0

0

0

14

K-Humphries

R-Evans

-

-

0

-

15

N-Jawai

P-O’Bryant

0

0

0

0

TOTAL

-1; +7

-6; +1

-1; +6

-3; +6

Legend:

[+] – Upgrade vs. last season; [-] – Downgrade vs. last season; [0] – Same vs. last season; [?] – Undetermined vs. last season; Grey Shade – New Add this season.

The main problem the Raptors have right now is rooted in the Basketball Philosophy of its Management Team which continues to place far too much emphasis on the Individual Offensive ability of specific players and not nearly enough emphasis on those same players’ Individual Defensive ability.

Until the Raptors add more multi-dimensional players to their roster with the ability to defend their position[s] effectively AND reward those players with additional playing time during important parts of games, Toronto will continue to be little more than a high scoring [entertaining?] Treadmill Team.

Raptors improvement relative to other teams in division & conference

Monday, September 14th, 2009

The 5 teams in the Atlantic Division finished in the following order last season:

1. Boston Celtics, 62-20/.756, 2nd East, Lost 2nd Round 
2. Philadelphia 76ers, 41-41/.500, 6th East, Lost 1st Round  
3. New Jersey Nets, 34-48/.415, 3rd East, Missed Playoffs
4. Toronto Raptors, 33-49/.402, 13th East, Missed Playoffs
5. New York Knicks, 32-50/.390, 14th East, Missed Playoffs

At this point in the off season, the teams have made the following player personnel changes:

BOSTON CELTICS
Significant Losses
1. Leon Powe [PF], UFA
2. Mikki Moore [PF-C], UFA
3. Stephon Marbury [PG]
4. Gabe Pruitt [PG-OG]

Significant Adds
1. Lester Hudson/2nd Round Draft Pick [No. 58, overall]
2. Rasheed Wallace, UFA
3. Sheldon Williams, UFA
4. Marquis Daniels, UFA

PHILADELPHIA 76ERS
Significant Losses
1. Reggie Evans [PF], trade
2. Andre Miller [PG], UFA
3. Theo Ratliff [PF-C], UFA

Significant Adds
1. Elton Brand [PF], returns from injury
2. Jason Smith [PF-C], returns from injury
3. Jason Kapono [SF], trade
4. Jrue Holiday [PG], 1st Round Draft Pick [No. 19, overall]  
5. Rodney Carney [SF], UFA

NEW JERSEY NETS
Significant Losses
1. Vince Carter [SF-OG], trade
2. Ryan Anderson [PF], trade

Significant Adds
1. Terrence Williams [SF-OG], 1st Round Draft Pick [No. 11, overall]
2. Courtney Lee [OG], trade
3. Rafer Alston [PG], trade
4. Tony Battie [PF-C], trade

TORONTO RAPTORS
Significant Losses
1. Jason Kapono [SF], trade
2. Shawn Marion [PF-SF], UFA/Sign & trade
3. Kris Humphries [PF], trade
4. Nathan Jawai [PF-C], trade
5. Anthony Parker [OG-SF-PG], UFA
6. Joey Graham [SF], UFA
7. Roko Ukic [PG], trade
8. Carlos Delfino [SF-OG], trade

Significant Adds
1. Reggie Evans [PF], trade
2. DeMar DeRozan [OG-SF], 1st Round Draft Pick [No. 9, overall]
3. Hedo Turkoglu [SF], Sign & trade
4. Antoine Wright [SF-OG], trade
5. Jarrett Jack [PG-OG], RFA
6. Marco Belinelli [OG-SF-PG], trade
7. Rasho Nesterovic [C-PF], UFA
8. Amir Johnson [PF], trade 

NEW YORK KNICKS
Significant Losses
1. Quentin Richardson [SF-OG], trade
2. Chris Wilcox, PF-C], UFA

Significant Adds
1. Danilo Gallinari [SF-PF], returns from injury
2. Jordan Hill [PF-C], 1st Round Draft Pick [No. 8, overall]
3. Toney Douglas [PG-OG], 1st Round Draft Pick [No. 29, overall]
4. Darko Milicic [PF-C], trade
5. Sun Yue [PG], UFA

While several NBA observers seem to think the Raptors SHOULD be much improved this coming season, based on the wholesale changes made to their roster … this corner does not necessarily share that same opinion, when evaluated against the LOSSESS & ADDS of the other teams in their Division.

Q1. Have the Raptors improved, overall, from last season, relative to their competition?

A1. Maybe; maybe not … is the correct answer, at this point.

The Knicks and Nets are in re-building mode, and the Raptors SHOULD have been expected to finish this coming season in NO WORSE than 3rd place in the Atlantic Division, behind the Celtics and, possibly, the 76ers … even if they would have done “nothing” substantive to improve their team this summer.

However, given that doing “nothing” was in fact the OPPOSITE of what the Raptors decided to do this off season … i.e. see above … it SHOULD now be EXPECTED that this supposedly improved team SHOULD finish NO WORSE than in 2nd place in the Atlantic Division behind the Boston Celtics.

Once this expectation is established, what then becomes interesting is …

if the divisional standings eventually look something like this:

ATLANTIC
1 Boston
2 Toronto or Philadelphia
3 Philadelphia or Toronto
4 New York or New Jersey
5 New Jersey or New York

and the conference standings eventually look something like this:

SOUTHEAST
1 Orlando
2 Atlanta or Miami or Washington
3 Miami Atlanto or Washington
4 Washington or Atlanta or Miami
5 Charlotte

CENTRAL
1 Cleveland
2 Detroit or Chicago or Indiana
3 Chicago or Detroit or Indiana
4 Indiana or Detroit or Chicago
5 Milwaukee

and the playoff race eventually looks something like this:

Eastern Conference
1-2-3 Orlando - High End, Southeast
1-2-3 Cleveland - High End, Central
1-2-3 Boston - High End, Atlantic

4-5-6 Atlanta - Upper Middle, Southeast
4-5-6 Miami - Upper Middle, Southeast
4-5-6 Washington - Upper Middle, Southeast

7-8-9-10-11-12 Detroit - Middle, Central
7-8-9-10-11-12 Chicago - Middle, Central
7-8-9-10-11-12 Indiana - Middle, Central
7-8-9-10-11-12 Toronto - Middle, Atlantic
7-8-9-10-11-12 Philadelphia - Middle, Atlantic
7-8-9-10-11-12 Charlotte - Low End, Southwest

12-13-14-15 Milwaukee - Low End, Central
12-13-14-15 New York - Low End, Atlantic
12-13-14-15 New Jersey - Low End, Atlantic

indicating, perhaps, that the relative strength of each division may be shifting this season:

#1. Southeast
#2. Central
#3. Atlantic 

IF a scenario like this is eventually what plays out this season, then, how much will the Raptors really have improved this summer, relative to the other teams in their Division and the Eastern Conference, as a whole?

Initial thoughts on the Raptors talent base compared with the previous 3 seasons

Monday, August 24th, 2009

Matching-up the Raptors’ current roster with the end-of-season version for the 2008-2009 campaign, on a position-by-position basis, looks like this:

#

Pos

2008-2009

33-49/.402

Adv

2009-2010

?/?

Assessment

 

1

PG

Calderon

à

Calderon

Injury-free = improved.

2

OG

Parker

ß

DeRozan

Solid vet > NCAA rookie.

3

SF

Marion

ß

Turkoglu

Better overall player.

4

PF

Bosh

=

Bosh

Perennial All-Star.

5

C

Bargnani

=

Bargnani

Same. *Wildcard*.

 

6

PG

Ukic

à

Jack

Stable. Better shooter.

7

OG

Kapono

à

Belinelli

Better scorer. Versatile.

8

SF

Graham

=

Wright

Medium-grade players.

9

PF

M-Bonsu

=

Evans

Energetic rebounder.

10

C

O’Bryant

à

Nesterovic

Significant upgrade.

 

11

PG

Banks

=

Banks

Same.

12

OG

Douby

=

Douby

Same.

13

PF

Jawai

=

Weems [SF]

Different not better.

14

PF

Humphries

=

Johnson

Different. Similar.

15

C

Voskuhl

=

O’Bryant

Will to improve?

SUMMARY:

- 2 players better from 2008-2009 [Darkest shade]
- 4 players better from 2009-2010 [Darker shade]

- 10 players relatively equal

- EDGE to 2009-2010

While it’s relatively easy to see how other NBA observers can feel that the Raptors have increased their Perceived Talent Level [PTL] by a substantial amount this off season, when a comparative eye is then cast further backwards, to the previous year [2007-2008]:

#

Pos

2007-2008

41-41/.500

Adv

2009-2010

?/?

Assessment

 

1

PG

Ford

à

Calderon

Injury-free = improved.

2

OG

Parker

ß

DeRozan

Solid vet > Rookie.

3

SF

Moon

à

Turkoglu

More consistent.

4

PF

Bosh

=

Bosh

Perennial All-Star.

5

C

Bargnani

=

Bargnani

Same. *Wildcard*.

 

6

PG

Calderon

=

Jack

Similar value; diff skills.

7

OG

Delfino

=

Belinelli

Similar value; diff skills.

8

SF

Kapono

=

Wright

Similar value; diff skills.

9

PF

Humphries

=

Evans

Energetic rebounder.

10

C

Nesterovic

=

Nesterovic

Same; older now.

 

11

PG

Martin

ß

Banks

Solid vet. Accepted role.

12

OG

Dixon

=

Douby

Similar value; diff skills.

13

SF

Johnson-L

=

Weems

Low grade players.

14

PF

Baston

à

Johnson-A

Upside. Under-used.

15

C

Brezec

=

O’Bryant

Will to improve?

SUMMARY:

- 2 players better from 2007-2008 [Darkest shade]
- 3 players better from 2009-2010 [Darker shade]

- 10 players relatively equal

- SLIGHT EDGE to 2009-2010

and, ultimately, to the watershed 2006-2007 season: 

#

Pos

2006-2007

47-35/.573

Adv

2009-2010

?/?

Assessment

 

1

PG

Ford

=

Calderon

Similar value, diff skills.

2

OG

Parker

ß

DeRozan

Euro star > Experience.

3

SF

Peterson

à

Turkoglu

More consistent player.

4

PF

Garbajosa

=

Bosh

Versatile Euro player.

5

C

Bosh

ß

Bargnani

All-Star > highly erratic.

 

6

PG

Calderon

=

Jack

Similar value; diff skills.

7

OG

Graham

à

Belinelli

More value; better skills.

8

SF

Bargnani

ß

Wright

More value; better skills.

9

PF

Humphries

=

Evans

Energetic rebounder.

10

C

Nesterovic

=

Nesterovic

Same. Older now.

 

11

PG

Martin

ß

Banks

Solid vet. Accepted role.