Posts Tagged ‘Phil Jackson’

Simple lessons learned from Bulls’ rise to the top

Saturday, August 7th, 2010

What’s does it really take to win big, in the NBA?

———————————–

Reinsdorf: ‘It took Scottie to put us over the top’

For many Bulls fans, it’s impossible to think about Michael Jordan without also thinking of Scottie Pippen. Chairman Jerry Reinsdorf shares that sentiment and he takes the thought one step further.

“Six championships that wouldn’t have been won without Scottie,” Reinsdorf said when asked what comes to mind when he recalls Pippen’s career. “Michael couldn’t have done it by himself. The rest of the players and Michael would not have been enough. It took Scottie to put us over the top those six times.”

It’s often been said that Pippen never won a title without Jordan, but Jordan never won it all without Pippen, either. At the end of the day, the two players were the perfect complement to each other. That’s why when Pippen enters basketball’s Hall of Fame on Aug. 13, it’s only fitting that he’ll join Jordan among the game’s greats in Springfield, Mass. just one year after his enshrinement.

“A lot of people liked to talk about Scottie as being Batman’s Robin or the Lone Ranger’s Tonto,” said Reinsdorf during a recent interview at the Berto Center. “I never thought that was the case and I liked to think of them as 1 and 1A. They were very, very close.”

The paring of the duo which brought Chicago six world championships in eight years was born on June 22, 1987 in New York City, the night of the 1987 NBA Draft. The Bulls owed two first round selections, eighth and tenth overall.

Then General Manager Jerry Krause had set his sights on Pippen, who had not long before been an unknown prospect out of Central Arkansas, a NAIA school at the time. Given that the Bulls were one of the very few teams who had ventured down to Conaway, Ark. to watch Pippen play collegiately, Reinsdorf recalled being confident they would be able to get him with the eighth pick. But the rest of the basketball world was about to learn of Pippen’s talents and abilities.

“We were sure we were going to be able to get Scottie where we were in the draft,” said Reinsdorf. “Then Scottie went to the pre-draft camps, lit it up and got everybody’s attention. We went into panic mode because we realized he wouldn’t be there when we were going to draft. We somehow had to move up and we were able to pull it off. But it was touch and go for awhile.”

Pippen was drafted by the Seattle SuperSonics fifth overall and his draft rights were traded to Chicago for Olden Polynice and future considerations. The Bulls also selected power forward Horace Grant with the tenth pick, setting the stage for the first three-peat.

———————————–

A series of highly intelligent personnel decisions … involving:

i. The right organizational paradigm;

ii. The right GM;

iii. The right Head Coach;

iv. The right core group of marquee players … with the right skill-sets and personal attributes;

v. The right set of complementary players … with the right skill-sets and personal attributes;

vi. Vision … to see with acuity what your competition is failing to see;

vii. Planning … to develop and implement a set of comprehensive objectives;

viii. Patience … to give it time and nourishment to grow organically;

ix. Good Judgment … to know when the time is right ‘to strike’

x. Wisdom … to understand well ‘The Value of Commitment’, in the first place.  

When a basketball Team succeeds, in a major way, it is never ever due to having just 1 outstanding player.

LeBron James, Kobe Bryant, Mike Brown, Phil Jackson, Chris Bosh, The Redeem Team, and the Handling of NBA Superstars

Thursday, July 22nd, 2010

For those of you who might be interested in a “lively” discussion on multiple, inter-related NBA topics:

———————————–

Courtesy of …

Amare Stoudemire, Lamar Odom’s “Lucky Game” and What it Means to be a Superstar

Instead of comparing how the Team USA coaching staff used Bosh in 2008 to the way they used the rest of their players, compare how Bosh [himself] played in 2008 vs how he played in 2006 and the impact he had in 2008 vs the impact he had in 2006, in comparison with the other Bigs on the roster [e.g. in terms of MP, St, Rebs, etc.].

 

Other key additions, included Kobe Bryant [a big factor, to be sure], Deron Williams, Jason Kidd, Tayshaun Prince, Michael Redd and Carlos Boozer … who each effected the way the 2008 team played, in their own unique way.

 

————–

 

When I say that Mike Brown was/is a poor offensive coach, I am not repeating the claims of anyone else.

 

My perceptions about the game of basketball are not derived from media reports.

 

Mike Brown is not an elite level communicator.

 

Mike Brown is not an elite level X’s and O’s offensive guru.

 

Mike Brown is aware of his own deficiencies, at least in these two areas, as a head coach, and sought out the assistance of someone like Ettore Messina to “improve” his own understanding of the game, from an offensive perspective, and then delegated responsibility to one of his assistant coaches to run the Cavs’ offensive systems, both, in practices and in games.

 

Mike Brown does not have a “wholistic” Basketball Philosophy, which comes close to approximating a System Of Play, like the Triangle Offense.

 

Mike Brown’s offensive “system” lacks creativity, imagination, versatility and discipline.

 

Conversely, Mike Brown is a very good defensive coach.

 

————–

 

Those who mistakenly thought/think that Bill Belichick was/is a poor offensive coach … are simply idiots. 

 

I pay no attention to idiots. :-)

 

————–

 

Au contraire … there are all sorts of strategies and tactics which an authentically elite level coach can use to overcome the fact that his/her best player may have quit in the middle of a critical contest.

 

Mike Brown used none of these.

 

In fact, the chief reason LeBron James may have acted - and performed - the way he did, when he played poorly vs Boston this year, is BECAUSE of Mike Brown … and, specifically, what he and the rest of his teammates knew about the way they were being coached by Mike Brown, vs how the Celtics were being coached by Doc Rivers.

 

[e.g. the level of disrespect which the Cavs, as a group, showed towards Mike Brown was palpable, as the series developed ... and, IMO, an astute basketball observer could clearly see that the players on their team were exasperated with the way their team was being handled in that series, in comparison with the way the Celtics were being handled by Doc Rivers & Co. LeBron James did not quit in those games; the Cavaliers decided to say "F-U" to Mike Brown because they did not agree with what was going on [A] behind the scenes AND [B] on the floor.]

 

IMO, an authentic elite level coach would not have done what Mike Brown did in the Game 2 post-game press conference; nor, would s/he have done, in general, what Mike Brown did while coaching LeBron James for the last 7 years.

 

Superstar players - e.g. Bill Russell, Oscar Robertson, Kareem Abdul-Jabbar, Julius Erving, Moses Malone, Magic Johnson, Larry Bird, Michael Jordan, Hakeem Olajuwon, David Robinson, Tim Duncan, Kobe Bryant, Dwyane Wade, LeBron James, etc. - like … and, in fact, crave the opportunity - to play for an authentic elite level coach.

 

In general, they do not despise being “coached” by this person and want to have him fired.

 

khandor

———————————–

David Friedman is someone who has written about “the NBA game” extensively, in a variety of different forms, over a number of years.

 

Update:

Since David’s blog has a 4096 character limit, the decision was made to publish both:

a. His response to my comment; and,
b. My reply comment, in return;

in this location instead.

Enjoy!

============================

[a. David's response to my comment]

Khandor:

My Team USA report card (see link above) details the insignificant roles that Boozer, Prince and Redd had for the 2008 team. Williams and Kidd certainly made solid contributions.

Bryant was the biggest difference.

It should be considered a sign of strength and confidence when a coach seeks out the wisdom of other coaches to increase his understanding of the game. The greatest coaches regularly seek out other coaches to watch how they run their practices, etc.

The word you were looking for is “holistic.”

Brown’s coaching philosophy emphasizes the importance of defense and is based on what he learned while serving as a member of Popovich’s staff on the Spurs (including during their 2003 championship run). Brown publicly stated on several occasions that his first and top priority as Cavs’ coach was to transform the team into an elite defensive squad, which he did.

The “disrespect” shown toward Brown stemmed mainly, if not entirely from LeBron James–a shameful display of immaturity by the self-proclaimed “King.”

Brown’s postgame rant after game two, which was not at all typical of how he usually conducted himself (I was at that press conference and at many others conducted by Brown), was clearly an attempt to rouse the team out of the complacency that had taken hold as a result of LeBron’s indifference (i.e., quitting). Perhaps if the franchise had not coddled LeBron for so long things might have turned out differently.

I agree that great players crave the opportunity to be coached. Perhaps LeBron is not at the level of the esteemed players you listed–not in terms of his obvious, indisputable talent but rather in terms of the mentality it takes to be a champion–or perhaps he has had his ear bent for too long by his high school buddies.

Contrary to what you wrote, Cleveland players other than LeBron (including Ilgauskas and Mo Williams) publicly expressed disagreement with Brown’s firing, with Williams explicitly saying that unless the Cavs hired Phil Jackson this was a mistake.

Thursday, July 22, 2010 1:26:00 PM

============================

[b. my reply comment]

re: Kobe was the biggest difference for Team USA. - DF 

I agree.

re: Bosh did play well for Team USA in the Olympics - DF [from an earlier comment]

I agree.

re: but Team USA could have won without him. - DF [from an earlier comment]

I agree that “anything” could have happened, if any “one” of the different “parts” to The Redeem Team might have been changed, either, big or small. That’s how it goes in the game of basketball which is heavily dependent on an intangible like “team chemistry”.

re: Team USA would not have won the gold medal without Kobe Bryant. - DF [from an earlier comment]

I agree … but for the same reason the Team might not have won without the services of any of their other [i.e. lesser] players, as well.

re: Other key additions, included Kobe Bryant [a big factor, to be sure], DeRon Williams, Jason Kidd, Tayshaun, Michael Redd and Carlos Boozer … who each effected the way the 2008 team played, in their own unique way. - khandor

Do you agree with this observation of mine?

I wrote “wholistic” for a specific reason.

[NOTE: What I should have done though is put quotes around the word to indicate that the "error" was made with a specific purpose in mind, to illustrate a more subtle point.]

re: Mike Brown is not an elite level communicator. Mike Brown is not an elite level X’s and O’s offensive guru. - khandor

I said these two things about Mike Brown’s ability as a head coach.

re: It should be considered a sign of strength and confidence when a coach seeks out the wisdom of other coaches to increase his understanding of the game. The greatest coaches regularly seek out other coaches to watch how they run their practices, etc. - DF

I did not speak about a “lack of strength” or a “lack of confidence”, on the part of Mike Brown.

I agree with the notion that it’s important to seek out assistance from others when a known deficiency exists in one’s own portfolio of professionally required skills.

Just because Mike Brown happens to know what his “weaknesses” were/are, as a head coach, does not mean that those same areas are somehow also not to be considered as his specific deficiencies.

We agree about Mike Brown’s philosophy and ability, as a defensive coach.

re: The “disrespect” shown toward Brown stemmed mainly, if not entirely from LeBron James–a shameful display of immaturity by the self-proclaimed “King.” - DF

I agree with this observation.

In part, it was a sign of petulance by a head-strong young man … but, not dissimilar to when Kobe played an entire 4th quarter of a [playoff?] game and simply refused to shoot the ball, in order to “show” the ZenMaster tangible “evidence” of what exactly he thought of his dictates to both Black Mamba and the rest of his teammates at the time.

When a petulant player also goes for double-digit rebounds in that same game, however, it is not accurate to characterize his actions as “having simply quit”.

[NOTE: IMO, it would be more accurate to assert that this player did not like how the team was being asked to play on offense at that point in time and expressed his displeasure in a selfish manner. This is the sort of thing that happens all the time in basketball, at every level of the game ... but what was different here is THE WAY in which Mike Brown chose to handle it, i.e. which was basically to do nothing "subtle" about it, and instead, after-the-fact, to try to do the WRONG THING about it, i.e. rant and rave in public in an effort to "rouse" either his "star" player and/or his supporting cast.]

re: Brown’s postgame rant after game two, which was not at all typical of how he usually conducted himself - DF

It is not just how one conducts oneself “typically” which determines if one should be placed in an elite category … but, also, how one actually conducts oneself in an “atypical” moment.

IMO, Mike Brown made a coaching mistake.

IMO, LeBron James was crying out “to be coach” and, unfortunately, Mike Brown … as well as many others in his life … let him down [which is not to say that HE did not let them down, in return, because HE most certainly did].

Father-and-son breakdowns are, in general, a two-way street.

What Mo and Zydrunas said regarding Mike Brown’s dismissal and their loyal support of him does not stand in opposition to the observations which I made. They are merely corollaries.

What I said was speaking primarily to what I observed from the actions [and inter-actions] of LeBron James, Shaquille O’Neal, Anthony Parker, Antawn Jamison, Delonte West, Daniel Gibson, Jamario Moon, Jawad Williams and JJ Hickson.

As I’ve mentioned to you before …

You and I agree about many things associated with the game; however, it is some of the more subtle things which we sometimes approach from a distinctly different vantage point.

As the kids say, though:

“It’s all good.”

 

 

Defense, Rebounding and, then, ‘Team’ Offense

Friday, June 18th, 2010

The NBA is a league with 63 years of history, and any franchise which truly aspires to win the championship, one day in the future, but refuses to acknowledge the primacy of the 3 main aspects of basketball success …

#1 Team Defense,

#2 Rebounding,

and,

#3 Team [not individual] Offense

… is simply kidding itself, as well as its loyal fanbase.

As Pat Riley so aptly said, years ago, while winning back-to-back titles with the original ShowTime LA Lakers:

“No Rebounds; No Rings.”

and,

as KG & Co. have so eloquently and rhythmically espoused, en masse, for the last few years …

What it takes to win the NBA Championship really does involve making a total Team Commitment to playing the game the RIGHT WAY.

Congratulations to the LA Lakers organization for learning its lessons well, and being able to ‘walk the walk.’

When the Lakers needed him, Ron-Ron was there … playing in the moment

Friday, June 18th, 2010

Over the last 13 months, this is some of what’s been written in this space about the Lakers’ mercurial one: 

Ron Artest is a foxhole guy … [May 7, 2009]

Yet another reason to root-root for Ron-Ron this season [Jan 14, 2010]

In the wee hours of this morning, in the aftermath of Los Angeles’ victory in Game 7, this is what was said about him by the ZenMaster, himself, and Doc Rivers, and Glen Davis, and Sekou Smith:

Artest Sings Redemption’s Song

Kobe Bryant walked out of the Staples Center Thursday night with his fifth NBA title and his second straight Finals MVP. He praised the “Spaniard” [Pau Gasol] specifically for all his help in reaching this career milestone.

The MVP on this night, however, was none other than Ron Artest.

No one walked out of the building without seeing that, not after his 20 points, five rebounds, five steals and iron will helped drag the Lakers back from a 13-point deficit to beat back a Celtics team that controlled the action for much of the night.

“Ron Artest was the most valuable player tonight,” Lakers coach Phil Jackson said. “He brought life to our team, he brought life to the crowd.”

————————————————-

June 17 2010, Part I

June 17 2010, Part II

 

————————————————-

Kudos to the man … from Queensbridge, NY … who always seeks to KEEP IT REAL! :-)

 

Related:

Artest delivers crazy finish to title

Arnovitz breaks down the Lakers’ Game 6 defense

Wednesday, June 16th, 2010

The Lakers’ defense gets it done

The Lakers pressured the Celtics all night, making life particularly miserable for Paul Pierce. The defense was all the more stifling because Kobe Bryant continued to play rover, sloughing off Rajon Rondo in the half court to plug holes and double-team the ball. Bryant’s strategy was nothing new, but the Lakers’ quickness to the ball, readiness on ball screens and relentlessness on those traps were unprecedented. Literally. The Lakers’ defensive rating of 75.3 on Tuesday night was their best mark of the season — and far and away the Celtics’ worst offensive output since opening night.

A real key was Phil Jackson’s decision to have the Lakers “trap” more aggressively vs Boston’s “Pick and Pop” offensive action, in conjunction with allowing Kobe Bryant to rotate out, at least initially, to the temporarily “open” shooter … whoever he might be … while consistently “helping off” of Rajon Rondo.

When this version of the LA Lakers plays with this sort of well-coordinated Offense, Defense and Rebounding they are simply the best team in the NBA.

How the Lakers SHOULD attack the Celtics in Game 6

Tuesday, June 15th, 2010

The Triangle Offense is a thing of beauty … when it’s executed properly.

—————————

Q1. Which specific option is the best one for the Lakers to use in Game 6, considering the difficulty Los Angeles has had scoring efficiently?

A1. The option which they have steadfastly refused to go to in each of their 3 losses!

i.e. The Wing/Corner Pick and Roll/Pop [with Kobe Bryant as the ballhandler]

—————————

Fig. 1 -  Initial Alignment

Fig. 2 - Wing/Corner Entry Pass

Fig. 3 - UCLA Backscreen and Weak Side Triangle

Fig. 4 - Wing Pick and Pop

Fig. 5 - Wing Drives Into the Lane to, either, Shoot or Pass

What Boston showed in its series with Orlando is just how vulnerable the Celtics are to a team that will repeatedly put the C’s into Pick and Roll/Pop situations.

Unlike Orlando, however, what the Lakers need to do … instead of having their Picker roll to the basket repeatedly, ala Dwight Howard … is have Pau Gasol set the Wing Pick … ala Bill Wennington [Chicago Bulls],

e.g. like what you see at the 4:40 and 4:50 marks of this video clip

… and then Pop Out to the Wing/Corner, in order to stretch the Celtics defense and allow their best player, i.e. Kobe Bryant, to facilitate the remainder of their half-court offense with their:

i. Other PF/C [i.e. Bynum/Odom/Powell] in the Weak Side Screening position;

ii. PG [i.e. Fisher/Farmar/Brown] in the Weak Side Corner position; and,

iii. SF [i.e. Artest/Vujacic/Walton] in the Weak Side Free Throw Line Extednded position.

Instead of having Kobe Bryant establish his initial position as the Weak Side Pinch Post player [i.e. #4, in the diagrams above] … which is precisely what the Lakers have done repeatedly, in all 5 games, thus far … Los Angeles needs to:

i. Put their best “Pick and Roll/Pop artist” in the Ball Side Wing/Corner position [i.e. #3, in the diagrams above];

ii. Get him the ball [i.e. either, via pass or dribble-handoff] after their initial Offensive Transition has failed to generate a high percentage FGA;

and, then,

iii. Allow him to go to work against the Celtics’ Defense, off the dribble, from the Wing position, with the rest of the floor spread in this manner.

If the Lakers execute this part of the Triangle Ofense … which Michael Jordan’s Bulls teams did so exquisitely with largely average Centers like Wennington, Luc Longley and Bill Cartwright … then, Los Angeles has a very good chance to force a Game 7, in what would go down in NBA history as an epic Finals series.

—————————–

PS. Dr. Phil is the winningest head coach in NBA history and it will be up to him to figure this out, and then make the Lakers execute this option within their offense. 

Related:

Five ways for the Lakers to win it all, again

How the Lakers have managed to lose 3 games, so far, in the NBA Finals

Tuesday, June 15th, 2010

The Lakers have slightly better personnel, overall, than the Boston Celtics.

Yet, the Lakers are trailing 2-3, in this series.

Q1. How come?

A1. Primarily, because … at least, to this point … Phil Jackson is being out-coached by Doc Rivers, when it comes to using his personnel properly.

If you take a closer look at the simple game stats for the series, so far, for the players each team is using at the Power Forward and Center positions, this is what you should be able to see:

BOSTON CELTICS

Role

STARTERS

KEY SUBS

Pos

PF/C

C

PF

PF/C

Player

Garnett

Perkins

Davis

Wallace

 

MP

PTS

REB

AST

TO

BS

MP

PTS

REB

AST

TO

BS

MP

PTS

REB

AST

TO

BS

MP

PTS

REB

AST

TO

BS

G1

34:47

16

4

1

1

1

24:25

8

3

1

1

0

18:36

3

3

1

1

0

18:12

9

4

0

1

1

G2

23:43

6

4

6

0

0

31:47

12

6

3

2

0

18:10

8

7

1

1

1

18:07

7

7

1

1

0

G3

31:45

25

6

3

3

1

21:42

5

11

1

2

0

23:42

12

3

0

3

0

18:40

2

4

3

0

1

G4

26:30

13

6

3

2

1

24:41

6

7

0

0

0

22:29

18

5

0

0

0

21:45

3

2

0

1

0

G5

36:09

18

10

3

3

2

31:38

4

7

1

2

0

13:09

0

3

1

0

0

14:45

5

4

0

0

1

G6

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

G7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LOS ANGELES LAKERS

Role

STARTERS

KEY SUBS

Pos

PF/C

C

PF

C

Player

Gasol

Bynum

Odom

?

 

MP

PTS

REB

AST

TO

BS

MP

PTS

REB

AST

TO

BS

MP

PTS

REB

AST

TO

BS

MP

PTS

REB

AST

TO

BS

G1

46:34

23

14

3

3

3

28:09

10

6

0

1

0

21:17

5

4

1

2

1

-

-

-

-

-

-

G2

41:58

25

8

3

1

6

39:00

21

6

0

2

7

14:38

3

5

1

1

0

-

-

-

-

-

-

G3

38:58

13

10

4

1

2

29:11

9

10

0

1

1

27:51

12

5

1

1

0

-

-

-

-

-

-

G4

44:10

21

6

3

4

2

12:10

2

3

0

1

0

39:05

10

7

1

1

0

-

-

-

-

-

-

G5

38:05

12

12

0

1

0

31:38

6

1

0

1

0

26:17

8

8

2

3

0

-

-

-

-

-

-

G6

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

G7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Power Forward and Center Stats

During 3 Boston Wins

Game

CELTICS

LAKERS

PTS

REBS

AST

TO

BS

PTS

REBS

AST

TO

BS

2

33

24/+

11/+

4/0

1/-

49

19/-

4/-

4/0

13/+

4

40

20/+

3/-

3/+

1/-

33

16/-

4/+

6/-

2/+

5

27

24/+

5/+

5/0

3/+

26

21/-

2/-

5/0

0/-

 

Power Forward and Center Stats

During 2 Lakers Wins

Game

CELTICS

LAKERS

PTS

REBS

AST

TO

BS

PTS

REBS

AST

TO

BS

1

36

14/-

3/-

4/+

2/-

38

24/+

4/+

6/-

4/+

3

44

24/-

6/+

8/-

2/-

34

25/+

5/-

3/+

3/-

 

Boston is gradually … and, seemingly, inevitably … wearing down Pau Gasol because Phil Jackson is refusing to play Josh Powell, when the Celtics’ consistent use of 4 Bigs [i.e. Garnett & Perkins and Davis & Wallace] … vs just 3 Bigs … DICTATES THAT HE SHOULD RESPOND IN PRECISELY THIS MANNER.

As was first said here in the NBA Finals Preview …

What you should expect from this year’s NBA Finals [June 3 2010]

… the Lakers are, in fact, the better team in this specific match-up, except, of course, if Phil Jackson manages to get out-coached by Doc Rivers, for example, by refusing to use Josh Powell [PF] vs Glen Davis [PF], which would effectively lessen the load that Pau Gasol [PF/C] is working under trying to play against BOTH Kevin Garnett [PF/C] AND Rasheed Wallace [PF/C].

It will be extremely interesting to see:

i. How many minutes Pau Gasol, Andrew Bynum and Lamar Odom are going to play in Game 6 [and, possibly, Game 7];

ii. How effective Pau Gasol, Andrew Bynum and Lamar Odom are during the minutes which they play in Game 6 [and, possibly, Game 7]; and,

iii. Whether, or not, Phil Jackson finally decides to use a bench player with the specific skill-set of Josh Powell [PF] properly;

with only 1 rest day [and a coast-to-coast airplane flight, with a 3 hour time change] between Game 5 and Game 6, and then between Game 6 and Game 7.

—————————-

Related:

Who has outcoached Doc Rivers?

—————————-

PS. Those who perpetually under-value the work and ability of Doc Rivers, and/or the fundamental role played by an authentically elite level head coach in the day-to-day performance of NBA teams and players simply demonstrate that they fail to understand how the game of basketball actually works.

What you should expect from this year’s NBA Finals

Thursday, June 3rd, 2010

The NBA Finals [v.2009-2010] tip off this evening in Los Angeles.

                       

LEGITIMATE CONTENDERS IN THE NBA PLAYOFFS

[as of Thursday April 15, 2010]

 

TEAM

W

L

W%

EAST

WEST

PDR

PAR

RDR

QR

QIR

Celtics

50

32

.610

4

 

9

5

25

39

12

Lakers

57

25

.695

 

1

6

9

7

22

6

LEGEND: W – Wins; L – Losses; Win% - Winning Percentage; PDR – Points Differential Ranking; PAR – Points Allowed Ranking; RDR – Rebounding Differential Ranking; QR – Quality Rating [i.e. PDR + PAR + RDR = QR]; QIR – Quality Index Ranking [i.e. QR/#1-16].

While Rounds 1, 2 and 3 have produced some fair-to-good basketball, this version of the Finals should prove to be an entirely different kettle of fish.

 

NBA PLAYOFFS
4th Round [FINALS] MATCH-UP

 

Celtics

50

32

.610

4

 

9

5

25

39

12

Lakers

57

25

.695

 

1

6

9

7

22

6

STARTERS

Rajon Rondo

Ray Allen

Paul Pierce

Kevin Garnett

Kendrick Perkins

ß

à

=

=

=

Derek Fisher

Kobe Bryant

Ron Artest

Pau Gasol

Andrew Bynum

+1

Sub-Total

+1

KEY SUBS

Tony Allen

Glen Davis

Rasheed Wallace

=

=

à

Shannon Brown

Josh Powell

Lamar Odom

0

Sub-Total

+1

OTHERS

Nate Robinson

Michael Finley

Marquis Daniels

Shelden Williams

=

=

=

=

Jordan Farmar

Sasha Vujacic

Luke Walton

DJ Mbenga

COACHING

Doc Rivers

à

Phil Jackson

0

Sub-Total

0

+1

TOTAL

+2

Analysis: If Kevin Garnett was 100% healthy and fully recovered from his knee injury of last season, then, the Celtics might actually be the correct pick in this match-up. Although he seems to be regaining some of his former vertical explosiveness and a good deal of his horizontal speed, his lateral quickness and agility are still not back to what they were 2 seasons ago, when he was one of the best defensive players in the history of the NBA.

 

Conversely, when the Lakers are relatively healthy – which they haven’t been for much of this season - they are simply the best team in the NBA this year. Although the Celtics’ Starting 5 is formidable, the Lakers should be able to withstand the initial on-slaught … if they use their bench players properly … and, then, gradually wear Boston down over the course of a physically grueling series.

 

Shortening Boston’s rotation should not produce an advantage for the Celtics against this opponent.

 

Pick: LOS ANGELES has the home court advantage this time and should win in 6 [or, perhaps, 7] games.

 

[Caveat: If Phil Jackson should happen to get out-coached – e.g. refusing to use Josh Powell vs Glen Davis – by Doc Rivers, then, the Celtics could well capitalize and win this series.] 

These 2 teams are quite evenly matched.

The Lakers, however, signed Ron Artest last summer for one reason only.

i.e. To have him defend either LeBron James or Paul Pierce in the NBA Finals. 

If Ron Ron does his job properly, from a physical standpoint, and can play Da Truth to a virtual stand-off, then … all else being equal … the Lakers will be hoisting another championship banner to the rafters when the 2010-2011 kicks off in the fall.

It really is as simple as that.

Enjoy what should be a real hum-dinger of a series!

17th year anniversary for Doc Rivers and the ZenMaster

Wednesday, June 2nd, 2010

The Year was 1993.

The Date was June 2.

The Round was the Eastern Conference Finals.

The Game was #5. 

The Combatants were: [i] The mighty Chicago Bulls … coached by Phil Jackson … and, [ii] The insurgent New York Knicks … with a Point Guard [and an irstwhile head coach] named Glenn “Doc” Rivers [#25].

The Big Plays … both, made and not made … coming down-the-stretch and, in particular, the final moments … have become indelibly etched in the memory banks of any true NBA connoisseur.

The Charles Smith, Game 5

* Michael Jordan, 29 pts, 10 rebounds and 14 assists

* “You got to have a very strong will and a very big heart, if you go down the lane against the New York Knicks.” - Mike Fratello [TV Analyst]

* 4 failed layup attempts to take the lead on the final possession for the losing team

* Defense is the backbone

What the NBA Playoffs are supposed to be about!

———-

Related:

Doc and Phil were there (and so was Charles Smith), 17 years ago today

Coaching, sample sizes and adjustments

Wednesday, April 28th, 2010

3 weeks ago …

You were told in this space that the proper way for the Los Angeles Lakers to solve their problems this season would be to use Kobe Bean Bryant in a specific role:

Solving the Lakers’ problems with the Spurs, Apr 6 2010

Last week …

You were told in this space that the outcome of a playoff series can sometimes be determined by the ability of a team to make the correct game-to-game … and, THEN, in-game … adjustments, based on what its opponent’s specific strengths and weaknesses are and the best possible use of its own personnel:

Making the correct game-to-game adjustments can be THE difference between Winning and Losing in the Playoffs, Apr 23 2010

So much of what can be found on-line today concerning supposedly sound “basketball analysis” is little more than gobbledygook put forth by statistical gurus without a proper understanding of, 

How the NBA game actually works.”

===================================

Oklahoma City Thunder 87
LOS ANGELES LAKERS 111
Complete Series Info

 

===================================

The fact is …

1. Sample sizes are rendered virtually meaningless;

2. League-wide averages are rendered virtually meaningless; and,

3. Creating and minimizing individual mis-matches against the best teams in the league - and a particular opponent of high calibre - are absolutely crucial;

 … when it comes to determining accurately which teams, coaches and, therefore, players will advance in the playoffs, or not.

====================================

During the pre-season …

You were told in this space that the 2009-2010 NBA championship would, in all likelihood, be won by 1 of the following 5 teams:

EASTERN CONFERENCE
Orlando Magic
Cleveland Cavaliers
Boston Celtics [i.e. depending upon the recovery of Kevin Garnett from injury]

WESTERN CONFERENCE
Los Angeles Lakers
San Antonio Spurs

Nothing which has happened since that time has fundamentally changed that perception. 

Right now …

The 4 best teams in the Eastern Conference are the Cleveland Cavaliers [4-1], Orlando Magic [4-0], Boston Celtics [4-1] and Atlanta Hawks [2-2].

The 4 best teams in the Western Conference are the Los Angeles Lakers [3-2], San Antonio Spurs [3-2], Utah Jazz [3-1] and Phoenix Suns [3-2].

===================================

Barring any further major injuries …

This year’s NBA champions will, in all likelihood, be 1 of the following 3 teams:

Los Angeles Lakers, Phil Jackson [and Mitch Kupchak and Dr. Jerry Buss]
Orlando Magic, Stan Van Gundy [and Otis Smith and Richard DeVos]
San Antonio Spurs, Gregg Popovich [and RC Buford and Peter Holt]

… none of which happens to be the Cleveland Cavaliers with Mike Brown [and Danny Ferry and Daniel Gilbert].

Basketball is the ultimate TEAM Sport … with each player on the court having to be able to function adequately on Offense, on Defense, and in terms of Rebounding, in conjunction with the sound strategic and tactical decision-making skills of an elite level head coach, general manager and owner.

Those who think that basketball can be properly understood by examining the statistical norms, averages, outliers, etc., associated with representative “sample sizes”, “numerical formulas”, and all manner of “efficiency ratings,” are simply wasting their [and your] time.

Basketball is a game of:

I. Acumen;

and,

II. Inches;

… the most important of which are the “approximately 6″ located between the ears of a team’s owner, general manager, head coach and 8-9 regular rotation players.

Related:

Kobe Bryant, Closer to the ground

Every Move Must Have A Purpose