Posts Tagged ‘Mike Brown’

What is REALLY going on with the Lakers …

Thursday, March 8th, 2012

This is what was written in this same space on May 25, 2011, concerning the future plight of the Los Angeles Lakers:

=========================

Lakers going in WRONG direction, if Mike Brown is their next head coach

Mike Brown has already demonstrated that he is nothing like his one-time mentor, Gregg Popovich … or, Doc Rivers … or, Rick Adelman … or, Rick Carlisle … or, the as yet, untested Brian Shaw.

Mike Brown is most definitely nothing like the ZenMaster, Phil Jackson.

Mike Brown is someone who has been incapable of exercising the required “level of control” over a superstar player – like LeBron James [in Cleveland] or Kobe Bryant [in LA] – and lacks the type of “wholly integrated system of play” which is necessary to achieve major success in the NBA.

Mike Brown is a good defensive coach. Period.

Mike Brown is not someone who will improve the Lakers’ chances of the winning the NBA title next season, or anytime soon.

The Lakers’ major problems this year had nothing to do with their defensive systems of play … and everything to do with:

i. Their overall lack of talent, in comparison with previous editions of their team;

ii. The poor play of Derek Fisher and Steve Blake;

iii. Their lack of Team Cohesion;

and,

iv. Their overall lack of offensive discipline.

Mike Brown is not the right man to effectively address the Lakers’ specific needs.

=========================

This is what the current standings look like in the NBA.

These are the lowlights of last night’s game between the Lakers and the Wizards:

The following is one example of what is being said elsewhere in the blogosphere today about the Lakers’ current plight with Mike Brown at the helm of their listing ship:

=========================

With Kobe Bryant firing away, Pau Gasol addresses Lakers’ ‘selfishness’

We hold the Lakers up for a more strident brand of criticism because, frankly, they’re smarter than most teams. And they lost on Wednesday to perhaps the least-cerebral NBA team we’ve seen in decades of watching the game. Kobe Bryant watches more tape than any player in this league. Pau Gasol knows this game (literally and figuratively) inside and out. Mike Brown is absolutely obsessed with going over film and finding statistical quirks to take advantage of.

And yet, the Lakers are 23-16, and 15th in the NBA in offense. Let that swirl for a bit — a team featuring the league’s leading scorer paired with perhaps the NBA’s two most effortless low post scorers is mediocre offensively. No amount of arguing away the gaping holes at the point guard and small forward spots can make this any better. There’s no reason the Lakers should be this poor, 39 games into a season.

Actually, there are several reasons. And though we can point to Kobe firing away on Twitter all night, this comes down to coach Mike Brown actually attempting to stand up to his star player. Something he was clearly incapable of doing in Cleveland with LeBron James, and something he’s failing miserably at in Los Angeles.

=========================

When trying to understand properly what exactly is going on with the Lakers, so far this season, it’s important to place both Mike Brown and the players on their roster in the proper perspective.

1. The Lakers still have more than enough talent on their roster to win the Pacific Division this season:

Anticipated Lakers’ demise, simple case of ‘wishful thinking’

2. Mike Brown is far from being properly described as a terrible basketball coach.

What Mike Brown is … is a terrific defensive coach who, at this point in his career, is wholly incapable of coaching a star player like Kobe Bryant the way he actually needs to be coached … i.e. with the highest degree of personal discipline and responsibility possible … on a daily basis – in conjunction with other far less-talented but, nevertheless, still elite level players like Pau Gasol, Andrew Bynum, Metta World Peace, Troy Murphy, Josh McRoberts, Matt Barnes, Steve Blake, Derek Fisher, Luke Walton, Devin Ebanks, Darius Morris and Andrew Goudelock – in order to win a NBA Championship.

The first-year of Jim Buss’ organizational leadership for the Lakers continues to unfold in a most fascinating way.

For better, or worse … These are, now, Jim Buss’ Lakers

Thursday, May 26th, 2011

This is all you really need to know about the current situation with the LA Lakers:

1. What Jerry Buss didn’t say [Dec 21, 2009]

If Jim and Jerry Buss want my advice – and I’m pretty sure they don’t – they can save themselves a lot of grief and messy embarrassment if they’ll just sit back and chill, and let Phil and Jeanie take over. – Roland Lazenby

2. LeBron James, Kobe Bryant, Mike Brown, Phil Jackson, Chris Bosh, The Redeem Team, and the Handling of NBA Superstars

3. Phil Jackson’s Final Interview with the LA media [May 11, 2011]

- Especially what Jackson says about his “connection” to those in management positions with the team today, at @ the 19:00 mark of the video clip

4. Lakers issue statement on Mike Brown [May 25, 2011]

5. Lakers should’ve consulted Kobe on Brown hire [May 26, 2011] 

For Bryant, there was never time to consider Brown’s candidacy as Lakers coach because sources close to him say that he was never asked about the candidates to replace Phil Jackson. The Buss family promised they would proceed this way, without the consultation of the most important person in the franchise.

These are partnerships in the NBA, and Bryant, with five championships, should’ve been part of the process. Bryant didn’t deserve the chance to choose the next coach, nor did he have the inclination. In the end, such an arrangement makes for an impossible dynamic between an indebted coach and a star player.

Still, Bryant happens to be one of the sharpest basketball minds in the NBA, an ability to see the game in its most overt and subtle ways. So why wouldn’t you want Bryant’s input? Why wouldn’t you want to lay out to him the plan and vision of returning Bryant and these Lakers to championship basketball?

Mostly, Lakers vice president Jim Buss had a habit of exacerbating Jackson, and he’ll regret it should that be the basis of his relationship with Bryant now.

The San Antonio Spurs wouldn’t hire a coach without discussing names with Tim Duncan. Steve Nash gets immense input – probably too much – with the Phoenix Suns. Those two aren’t twentysomething’s at the apex, but they should still be afforded the chance to have names pushed past them. Bryant? The Lakers can still win titles with him. He’s no ceremonial franchise player. All they had to do was say, “Hey, what’s our feeling on Rick Adelman? Mike Brown? We’re balancing these strengths and weaknesses. What do you think?”

Jim Buss is running the Lakers now, and this is a frightening proposition for everyone.

Lakers going in WRONG direction, if Mike Brown is their next head coach

Wednesday, May 25th, 2011

If you happen to be a die-hard fan of the LA Lakers, and would like to see the team return to the NBA Finals, asap, then, the latest news from Hollywood, re: the search for a new head coach, is the worst possible:

————————————————————————

Sources: Brown, Lakers in serious talks

The Lakers are focused on talks with Brown, who was fired in 2010 after five seasons in Cleveland, where he went 272-138.

Los Angeles had considered longtime assistant Brian Shaw, but the focus is now on Brown, who is currently an NBA analyst for ESPN. There could be an agreement in place within the next 24-48 hours, sources say, but nothing has been finalized. Brown expects to reach a resolution one way or another with Los Angeles on Wednesday.

The two sides are working out issues that could be dealbreakers and cause the Lakers to go to another candidate, sources said, but there’s clearly momentum toward Brown becoming the next head coach.

The Lakers and Brown’s representation were discussing salary and length of contract on Tuesday, with the Lakers trying to hold the line on terms, sources said. Those talks will continue Wednesday, with the Lakers playing hard ball.

————————————————————————

Mike Brown?

Really?

This must be a joke, right?

Unless, of course, Dr. Jerry Buss has completely lost his mind?

Mike Brown has already demonstrated that he is nothing like his one-time mentor, Gregg Popovich … or, Doc Rivers … or, Rick Adelman … or, Rick Carlisle … or, the as yet, untested Brian Shaw.

Mike Brown is most definitely nothing like the ZenMaster, Phil Jackson. 

Mike Brown is someone who has been incapable of exercising the required “level of control” over a superstar player – like LeBron James [in Cleveland] or Kobe Bryant [in LA] – and lacks the type of “wholly integrated system of play” which is necessary to achieve major success in the NBA.

Mike Brown is a good defensive coach. Period.

Mike Brown is not someone who will improve the Lakers’ chances of the winning the NBA title next season, or anytime soon.  

The Lakers’ major problems this year had nothing to do with their defensive systems of play … and everything to do with:

i. Their overall lack of talent, in comparison with previous editions of their team;

ii. The poor play of Derek Fisher and Steve Blake;

iii. Their lack of Team Cohesion;

and,

iv. Their overall lack of offensive discipline.

Mike Brown is not the right man to effectively address the Lakers’ specific needs.

If the Lakers do eventually go in this direction, and hire Mike Brown, what it will mean is that something FUNDAMENTAL has now changed with the day-to-day operation of this team, and that Dr. Jerry Buss [owner] and Mitch Kupchak [GM] are no longer in control of this franchise.

LeBron James, Kobe Bryant, Mike Brown, Phil Jackson, Chris Bosh, The Redeem Team, and the Handling of NBA Superstars

Thursday, July 22nd, 2010

For those of you who might be interested in a “lively” discussion on multiple, inter-related NBA topics:

———————————–

Courtesy of …

Amare Stoudemire, Lamar Odom’s “Lucky Game” and What it Means to be a Superstar

Instead of comparing how the Team USA coaching staff used Bosh in 2008 to the way they used the rest of their players, compare how Bosh [himself] played in 2008 vs how he played in 2006 and the impact he had in 2008 vs the impact he had in 2006, in comparison with the other Bigs on the roster [e.g. in terms of MP, St, Rebs, etc.].

 

Other key additions, included Kobe Bryant [a big factor, to be sure], Deron Williams, Jason Kidd, Tayshaun Prince, Michael Redd and Carlos Boozer … who each effected the way the 2008 team played, in their own unique way.

 

————–

 

When I say that Mike Brown was/is a poor offensive coach, I am not repeating the claims of anyone else.

 

My perceptions about the game of basketball are not derived from media reports.

 

Mike Brown is not an elite level communicator.

 

Mike Brown is not an elite level X’s and O’s offensive guru.

 

Mike Brown is aware of his own deficiencies, at least in these two areas, as a head coach, and sought out the assistance of someone like Ettore Messina to “improve” his own understanding of the game, from an offensive perspective, and then delegated responsibility to one of his assistant coaches to run the Cavs’ offensive systems, both, in practices and in games.

 

Mike Brown does not have a “wholistic” Basketball Philosophy, which comes close to approximating a System Of Play, like the Triangle Offense.

 

Mike Brown’s offensive “system” lacks creativity, imagination, versatility and discipline.

 

Conversely, Mike Brown is a very good defensive coach.

 

————–

 

Those who mistakenly thought/think that Bill Belichick was/is a poor offensive coach … are simply idiots. 

 

I pay no attention to idiots. :-)

 

————–

 

Au contraire … there are all sorts of strategies and tactics which an authentically elite level coach can use to overcome the fact that his/her best player may have quit in the middle of a critical contest.

 

Mike Brown used none of these.

 

In fact, the chief reason LeBron James may have acted – and performed – the way he did, when he played poorly vs Boston this year, is BECAUSE of Mike Brown … and, specifically, what he and the rest of his teammates knew about the way they were being coached by Mike Brown, vs how the Celtics were being coached by Doc Rivers.

 

[e.g. the level of disrespect which the Cavs, as a group, showed towards Mike Brown was palpable, as the series developed ... and, IMO, an astute basketball observer could clearly see that the players on their team were exasperated with the way their team was being handled in that series, in comparison with the way the Celtics were being handled by Doc Rivers & Co. LeBron James did not quit in those games; the Cavaliers decided to say "F-U" to Mike Brown because they did not agree with what was going on [A] behind the scenes AND [B] on the floor.]

 

IMO, an authentic elite level coach would not have done what Mike Brown did in the Game 2 post-game press conference; nor, would s/he have done, in general, what Mike Brown did while coaching LeBron James for the last 7 years.

 

Superstar players – e.g. Bill Russell, Oscar Robertson, Kareem Abdul-Jabbar, Julius Erving, Moses Malone, Magic Johnson, Larry Bird, Michael Jordan, Hakeem Olajuwon, David Robinson, Tim Duncan, Kobe Bryant, Dwyane Wade, LeBron James, etc. – like … and, in fact, crave the opportunity – to play for an authentic elite level coach.

 

In general, they do not despise being “coached” by this person and want to have him fired.

 

khandor

———————————–

David Friedman is someone who has written about “the NBA game” extensively, in a variety of different forms, over a number of years.

 

Update:

Since David’s blog has a 4096 character limit, the decision was made to publish both:

a. His response to my comment; and,
b. My reply comment, in return;

in this location instead.

Enjoy!

============================

[a. David's response to my comment]

Khandor:

My Team USA report card (see link above) details the insignificant roles that Boozer, Prince and Redd had for the 2008 team. Williams and Kidd certainly made solid contributions.

Bryant was the biggest difference.

It should be considered a sign of strength and confidence when a coach seeks out the wisdom of other coaches to increase his understanding of the game. The greatest coaches regularly seek out other coaches to watch how they run their practices, etc.

The word you were looking for is “holistic.”

Brown’s coaching philosophy emphasizes the importance of defense and is based on what he learned while serving as a member of Popovich’s staff on the Spurs (including during their 2003 championship run). Brown publicly stated on several occasions that his first and top priority as Cavs’ coach was to transform the team into an elite defensive squad, which he did.

The “disrespect” shown toward Brown stemmed mainly, if not entirely from LeBron James–a shameful display of immaturity by the self-proclaimed “King.”

Brown’s postgame rant after game two, which was not at all typical of how he usually conducted himself (I was at that press conference and at many others conducted by Brown), was clearly an attempt to rouse the team out of the complacency that had taken hold as a result of LeBron’s indifference (i.e., quitting). Perhaps if the franchise had not coddled LeBron for so long things might have turned out differently.

I agree that great players crave the opportunity to be coached. Perhaps LeBron is not at the level of the esteemed players you listed–not in terms of his obvious, indisputable talent but rather in terms of the mentality it takes to be a champion–or perhaps he has had his ear bent for too long by his high school buddies.

Contrary to what you wrote, Cleveland players other than LeBron (including Ilgauskas and Mo Williams) publicly expressed disagreement with Brown’s firing, with Williams explicitly saying that unless the Cavs hired Phil Jackson this was a mistake.

Thursday, July 22, 2010 1:26:00 PM

============================

[b. my reply comment]

re: Kobe was the biggest difference for Team USA. – DF 

I agree.

re: Bosh did play well for Team USA in the Olympics – DF [from an earlier comment]

I agree.

re: but Team USA could have won without him. – DF [from an earlier comment]

I agree that “anything” could have happened, if any “one” of the different “parts” to The Redeem Team might have been changed, either, big or small. That’s how it goes in the game of basketball which is heavily dependent on an intangible like “team chemistry”.

re: Team USA would not have won the gold medal without Kobe Bryant. – DF [from an earlier comment]

I agree … but for the same reason the Team might not have won without the services of any of their other [i.e. lesser] players, as well.

re: Other key additions, included Kobe Bryant [a big factor, to be sure], DeRon Williams, Jason Kidd, Tayshaun, Michael Redd and Carlos Boozer … who each effected the way the 2008 team played, in their own unique way. – khandor

Do you agree with this observation of mine?

I wrote “wholistic” for a specific reason.

[NOTE: What I should have done though is put quotes around the word to indicate that the "error" was made with a specific purpose in mind, to illustrate a more subtle point.]

re: Mike Brown is not an elite level communicator. Mike Brown is not an elite level X’s and O’s offensive guru. – khandor

I said these two things about Mike Brown’s ability as a head coach.

re: It should be considered a sign of strength and confidence when a coach seeks out the wisdom of other coaches to increase his understanding of the game. The greatest coaches regularly seek out other coaches to watch how they run their practices, etc. - DF

I did not speak about a “lack of strength” or a “lack of confidence”, on the part of Mike Brown.

I agree with the notion that it’s important to seek out assistance from others when a known deficiency exists in one’s own portfolio of professionally required skills.

Just because Mike Brown happens to know what his “weaknesses” were/are, as a head coach, does not mean that those same areas are somehow also not to be considered as his specific deficiencies.

We agree about Mike Brown’s philosophy and ability, as a defensive coach.

re: The “disrespect” shown toward Brown stemmed mainly, if not entirely from LeBron James–a shameful display of immaturity by the self-proclaimed “King.” – DF

I agree with this observation.

In part, it was a sign of petulance by a head-strong young man … but, not dissimilar to when Kobe played an entire 4th quarter of a [playoff?] game and simply refused to shoot the ball, in order to “show” the ZenMaster tangible “evidence” of what exactly he thought of his dictates to both Black Mamba and the rest of his teammates at the time.

When a petulant player also goes for double-digit rebounds in that same game, however, it is not accurate to characterize his actions as “having simply quit”.

[NOTE: IMO, it would be more accurate to assert that this player did not like how the team was being asked to play on offense at that point in time and expressed his displeasure in a selfish manner. This is the sort of thing that happens all the time in basketball, at every level of the game ... but what was different here is THE WAY in which Mike Brown chose to handle it, i.e. which was basically to do nothing "subtle" about it, and instead, after-the-fact, to try to do the WRONG THING about it, i.e. rant and rave in public in an effort to "rouse" either his "star" player and/or his supporting cast.]

re: Brown’s postgame rant after game two, which was not at all typical of how he usually conducted himself – DF

It is not just how one conducts oneself “typically” which determines if one should be placed in an elite category … but, also, how one actually conducts oneself in an “atypical” moment.

IMO, Mike Brown made a coaching mistake.

IMO, LeBron James was crying out “to be coach” and, unfortunately, Mike Brown … as well as many others in his life … let him down [which is not to say that HE did not let them down, in return, because HE most certainly did].

Father-and-son breakdowns are, in general, a two-way street.

What Mo and Zydrunas said regarding Mike Brown’s dismissal and their loyal support of him does not stand in opposition to the observations which I made. They are merely corollaries.

What I said was speaking primarily to what I observed from the actions [and inter-actions] of LeBron James, Shaquille O’Neal, Anthony Parker, Antawn Jamison, Delonte West, Daniel Gibson, Jamario Moon, Jawad Williams and JJ Hickson.

As I’ve mentioned to you before …

You and I agree about many things associated with the game; however, it is some of the more subtle things which we sometimes approach from a distinctly different vantage point.

As the kids say, though:

“It’s all good.”

 

 

What was Mike Brown thinking?

Friday, May 14th, 2010

For considerable stretches this season … the fact is … the Cleveland Cavaliers were the best team in the NBA. During those specific periods of time the Cavs played the game in specific ways, while making excellent use of the different players on their roster, given their individual strengths and weaknesses.

Exhibit A

January

Opponent

Result

Sat 16

 @ LA Clippers

  W 102-101

 Tue 19

 vs Toronto

  W 108-100

 Thu 21

 vs LA Lakers

  W 93-87

 Sat 23

 vs Oklahoma City

  W 100-99

 Mon 25

 @ Miami

  W 92-91

 Wed 27

 vs Minnesota

  W 109-95

 Fri 29

 @ Indiana

  W 94-73

 Sun 31

 vs LA Clippers

  W 114-89

February

Opponent

Result

 Tue 02

 vs Memphis

  W 105-89

 Thu 04

 vs Miami

  W 102-86

 Sat 06

 vs New York

  W 113-106

 Tue 09

 vs New Jersey

  W 104-97

 Thu 11

 vs Orlando

  W 115-106

W-L Record

13-0

Exhibit B

February

Opponent

Result

Tue 23

 vs New Orleans

  W 105-95

 Thu 25

 @ Boston

  W 108-88

 Fri 26

 @ Toronto

  W 126-118

March

Opponent

Result

 Mon 01

 vs New York

  W 124-93

 Wed 03

 @ New Jersey

  W 111-92

 Fri 05

 vs Detroit

  W 99-92

 Sat 06

 @ Milwaukee

  L 85-92

 Mon 08

 vs San Antonio

  W 97-95

 Fri 12

 @ Philadelphia

  W 100-95

 Sun 14

 vs Boston

  W 104-93

 Tue 16

 @ Detroit

  W 113-101

 Wed 17

 vs Indiana

  W 99-94

 Fri 19

 @ Chicago

  W 92-85

 Sun 21

 vs Detroit

  W 104-79

 Wed 24

 @ New Orleans

  W 105-92

 Fri 26

 @ San Antonio

  L 97-102

 Sun 28

 vs Sacramento

  W 97-90

 Wed 31

 vs Milwaukee

  W 101-98

April

Opponent

Result

 Fri 02

 vs Atlanta

  W 93-88

W-L Record

17-2

However, in the Cavs’ abbreviated playoff run, their coaching staff made the seemingly inexplicable decision to fundamentally alter the way that they would use their collection of players in the post-season …

April

Opponent

Result

Sat 17

 vs Chicago 1st Round

  W 96-83

 Mon 19

 vs Chicago 1st Round

  W 112-102

 Thu 22

 @ Chicago 1st Round

  L 106-108

 Sun 25

 @ Chicago 1st Round

  W 121-98

 Tue 27

 vs Chicago 1st Round

  W 96-94

May

Opponent

Result

 Sat 01

 vs Boston 2nd Round

  W 101-93

 Mon 03

 vs Boston 2nd Round

  L 86-104

 Fri 07

 @ Boston 2nd Round

  W 124-95

 Sun 09

 @ Boston 2nd Round

  L 87-97

 Tue 11

 vs Boston 2nd Round

  L 88-120

 Thu 13

 @ Boston 2nd Round

  L 85-94

W-L Record

6-5

… which has now resulted in their elimination from further competition for the 2009-2010 NBA Championship and, quite possibly, thrown their organization into upheaval.

The best review of Cleveland’s Game 6 defeat, last night, at the hands of the Boston Celtics [NBA Champions, 2008-2009], which these eyes have seen, so far, can be found right here [by Dave, at nbaroundtable].

This is the comment which yours truly contributed:

———————————–

Dave,

1. Mike Brown’s poor use of his own team’s personnel is what lost this series for the Cavaliers.

2. Conversely, Doc Rivers deserves a tonne of credit for winning this series without Kevin Garnett being completely healthy.

3. “Never under-estimate the heart of a champion.” – Rudy T.

———————————–

If Kevin Garnett had been 100% healthy this season, then … according to your truly:

1. Danny Ainge would not have traded Eddie House … and,

2. The Boston Celtics would have been THE CLEAR-CUT FAVOURITES to represent the Eastern Conference in the 2009-2010 NBA FINALS … and,

going into these playoffs,

3. This corner would have tabbed the Celtics, in advance, to defeat the Cavaliers, in this 2nd Round series, primarily, for the following 2 reasons:

i. The 5-man unit comprised of Rajon Rondo, PG + Ray Allen, OG + Paul Pierce, SF + Kevin Garnett [at 100%], PF-C + Kendrick Perkins, C-PF is, still, the VERY BEST in the NBA today;

and,

ii. Doc Rivers is a championship-winning NBA head coach, who really does know what he’s doing, in the grand scheme of things, while Mike Brown, unfortunately, is not.

———————————–

For his own peace of mind, yours truly sincerely hopes that Mike Brown has a comprehensive answer to question of:

Why exactly he chose to abandon the player substitution patterns which had previously been successful for the Cavaliers this season?

… and, instead of using some combination of those possible rotations against these Celtics, he elected to:

I. Sit out JJ Hickson, completely;

II. Limit the use of Delonte West;

III. Limit the use of Jamario Moon;

iv. Sit out Jawad Williams, completely;

v. Fail to use the front-court tandem of Shaquille O’Neal [C] and JJ Hickson [PF];

vi. Use Shaquille O’Neal for more than 20 minutes per game;

vii. etc., etc., etc., … 

because there is absolutely NO SOUND REASON, whatsoever, yours truly can suggest for him to have taken this path of action, at this point.

———————————–

The writing has been on the wall in Cleveland for, at least, the last 2 seasons and it’s always a sad day when the lives of so many otherwise good people are effected negatively and inexoribly altered because a pro sports franchise is finally perceived to have grossly under-achieved under the direction of a specific head coach [and the general manager who hired him, in the first place].

The King holds court after yesterday’s practice

Thursday, May 13th, 2010

Best believe that a player of LeBron James’ ilk … i.e. a multi-dimensional performer who can pass the ball, score, rebound and defend … saw first-hand precisely what was visible to yours truly during the 2nd and 3rd quarters of Game 5.

Pay particular attention to the way in which he reacts in this video clip:

 

every time Mike Brown’s name is mentioned, or a member of the media asks a question about the gameplan from Tuesday and the wonky substitution patterns which materialised seemingly from thin air in Game 5.  

In order for the Cavaliers to win Game 6 this evening they will need to:

1. Stop playing Shaquille O’Neal for more than 20 minutes per game;

2. Return to using JJ Hickson for, at least, 20 minutes per game;

3. Return to using Delonte West for, at least, 20 minutes per game;

4. Return to using Jamario Moon for, at least 10 minutes per game;

5. Return to using Anderson Varejao for, at least, 27 minutes per game;

6. Return to using LeBron James, as their Back-up Point Guard … i.e. whenever Mo Williams is off the floor … in conjunction with the following group of 8 players:

Delonte West, OG
Anthony Parker, OG-SF
Jawad Williams, OG-SF
Jamario Moon, OG-SF
Antawn Jamison, PF
JJ Hickson, PF
Anderson Varejao, PF-C
Zydrunas Ilgauskas, C

in an assortment of 5-man units, given the fact that this group actually represents Cleveland’s set of most capable defensive and/or rebounding focused players.

On the other hand …

If Shaquille O’Neal is afforded the opportunity to repeat his “stellar” performance from Game 5:

Pos

Min

FG

3Pt

FT

+/-

Off

Reb

Ast

TO

Stl

BS

BA

PF

Pts

C

26:31

7-11

0-0

7-10

-26

1

4

2

2

1

4

1

3

21

tonight’s game 6 will, in all likelihood, mark the end of Cleveland’s season and Mike Brown’s tenure, as the Cavaliers’ head coach.

============================

Q1. How come, you ask?

A1. Because … defense is tha backbone!

and, unfortunately, The Big Diesel no longer has THAT specific skill in his once formidable repertoire.

Poor vs Good coaching was responsible for the Cavs’ loss in Game 5

Thursday, May 13th, 2010

Yesterday, elsewhere across the internet, the reason Cleveland lost to Boston in Game 5 was attributed to the failure of LeBron James to play as a NBA MVP should, when his team is playing at home against a worthy opponent.

This corner had a much different take, however, and placed the responsibility for this specific loss squarely on the shoulders of the Cavaliers’ head coach, Mike Brown, while giving due credit to his counterpart with the Celtics, Doc Rivers.

Q1. How come?

A1. If you take a closer look at the Substitution Chart [see below] for Game 5:

Time

Team

PG

OG

SF

PF

C

Start

End

Diff

2nd Q

Bos

Rondo

Allen-R

Allen-T

Davis

Wallace

21

21

-6

12:00

CLE

Williams

West

James

Varejao

Ilgauskas

23

29

+6

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

9:53

 

Time-out:

Regular

Boston

Bos 21

CLE 29

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bos

Allen-T

Allen-R

Pierce

Davis

Wallace

21

23

+2

9:53

CLE

 

 

 

 

 

29

29

-2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bos

 

 

 

 

 

23

23

0

9:06

CLE

Williams

West

Parker

Jamison

O’Neal

29

29

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bos

Allen-T

Allen-R

Pierce

Garnett

Perkins

23

26

+3

8:36

CLE

 

 

 

 

 

29

29

-3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bos

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7:10

CLE

Williams

Parker

James

Jamison

O’Neal

26

26

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

29

29

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7:10

 

Double

Techs

O’Neal

Perkins

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bos

Allen-T

Allen-R

Pierce

Davis

Garnett

26

37

+11

6:41

CLE

 

 

 

 

 

29

29

-11

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5:28

 

Time-out:

Official

 

Bos 30

CLE 29

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4:02

 

Time-out:

Regular

CLEVELAND

Bos 36

CLE 29

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bos

 

 

 

 

 

37

37

-3

4:02

CLE

Williams

Parker

James

Varejao

Ilgauskas

29

32

+3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bos

Rondo

Allen-R

Pierce

Davis

Garnett

37

42

-3

3:28

CLE

 

 

 

 

 

32

40

+3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1:49

 

Time-out:

Short

Boston

Bos 42

CLE 40

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bos

Rondo

Allen-R

Pierce

Garnett

Wallace

42

47

-4

1:49

CLE

 

 

 

 

 

40

41

+4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1:14

 

Time-out:

Short

CLEVELAND

Bos 44

CLE 40

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bos

 

 

 

Williams

Garnett

47

50

+3

0:43.2

CLE

West

Moon

James

Jamison

Ilgauskas

41

41

=3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bos

Rondo

Allen-R

Allen-T

Williams

Garnett

50

50

-3

0:17.5

CLE

Williams

West

James

Jamison

Ilgauskas

41

44

+3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bos

Rondo

Finley

Allen-T

Pierce

Garnett

50

50

0

0:08.6

CLE

Gibson

West

Moon

Jamison

Ilgauskas

44

44

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3rd Q

Bos

Rondo

Allen-R

Pierce

Garnett

Perkins

50

67

+9

12:00

CLE

Williams

Parker

James

Jamison

O’Neal

44

42

-9

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5:54

 

Time-out:

Short

CLEVELAND

Bos 67

CLE 52

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bos

 

 

 

 

 

67

68

-1

5:54

CLE

Gibson

Parker

James

Jamison

O’Neal

52

52

+1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bos

 

 

 

 

 

68

73

+2

5:30

CLE

Gibson

Parker

James

Jamison

Varejao

52

55

-2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bos

Rondo

Allen-R

Pierce

Davis

Perkins

73

73

0

3:47

CLE

 

 

 

 

 

55

55

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bos

 

 

 

 

 

73

78

0

3:10

CLE

Gibson

Parker

James

Varejao

Ilgauskas

55

60

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3:02

 

Time-out:

Regular

Boston

Bos 73

CLE 55

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bos

Rondo

Allen-T

Pierce

Davis

Wallace

78

80

-1

00:50.9

CLE

 

 

 

 

 

60

63

+1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bos

 

 

 

 

 

80

80

0

00:17.5

CLE

Gibson

Parker

Moon

Varejao

Ilgauskas

63

63

0

LEGEND: Diff – Points difference; Bold – Player substituted into game; Italics – Player shifted to a new position.

What you should be able to see is that:

1. The Cavs line-ups which included Shaquille O’Neal at Center during the 2nd and 3rd quarters were outscored by a whopping margin of -21 points.

2. At no time during this entire stretch did Mike Brown substitute JJ Hickson [PF] into the game and then use Anderson Varejao at the Center position.

3. During the key stretch of the 2nd quarter … from 6:41 to 4:02 … during which the Possession Outcome Chart looked like this:

Game

Poss

Team

Poss

 

Time

Boston

Celtics

Score

26-29

Team

Poss

 

Time

CLEVELAND

CAVALIERS

1

 

 

 

 

 

1

06:24

Jamison – TO

2

1

06:08

R-Allen – J3 [Orb/T]

 

 

 

 

 

3

2

06:07

Garnett – 2 of 2 FT

28

 

 

 

 

4

 

 

 

 

 

2

05:55

James – J3

5

3

05:45

Garnett – J2

30

 

 

 

 

6

 

 

 

 

 

3

05:28

Jamison – TO

7

4

05:09

Garnett – J2

32

 

 

 

 

8

 

 

 

 

 

4

04:42

Jamison – LU

9

5

04:34

R-Allen – D

34

 

 

 

 

10

 

 

 

 

 

5

04:04

Parker – TO

11

6

04:02

Pierce – LU + 1 FT

37

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6

04:02

Time-out: Regular

 

5-6

83%

 

 

 

0-6

0%

 

LEGEND: J2 – 2 point jump shot; J3 – 3 point jump shot; LU – Layup; DLU – Driving layup; D – Dunk; FT – Free throw; B/S – Blocked shot; TO – Turnover; OPF – Offensive personal foul; Orb – Offensive rebound; T – Team rebound.

Kevin Garnett [C] was a 1 man wrecking crew, while working beside Glen Davis [PF], against the front-court duo of Antawn Jamison [PF] and Shaquille O’Neal [C].

4. Mike Brown called his only time-out of the 3rd quarter after Boston had pushed its lead from 6 to 15 points, in the midst of a 17-8 run, at the start of the 2nd half … during which time he chose to make only 1 player substitution, i.e. replacing Williams with Gibson [at the PG spot], despite the Possession Outcome Chart for this quarter looking like what you see below:

Game

Poss

Team

Poss

 

Time

Boston

Celtics

Score

50-44

Team

Poss

 

Time

CLEVELAND

CAVALIERS

1

1

11:40

Garnett – J2 [Orb/RA]

 

 

 

 

 

2

2

11:27

R-Allen – J3

53

 

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

 

 

1

11:08

Williams – J2

4

3

10:59

Pierce – J2 [Orb/PP]

 

 

 

 

 

5

4

10:54

R-Allen – J3

56

 

 

 

 

6

 

 

 

 

46

2

10:29

O’Neal – D

7

5

10:15

Garnett – TO/OPF

 

 

 

 

 

8

 

 

 

 

 

3

09:57

James – TO/OPF

9

6

09:47

Rondo – DLU

58

 

 

 

 

10

 

 

 

 

 

4

09:31

James – J2

11

7

09:05

Garnett – LU

60

 

 

 

 

12

 

 

 

 

 

5

08:52

Jamison – J2 [B-S/KG]

13

8

08:29

Rondo – J2

62

 

 

 

 

14

 

 

 

 

 

6

08:14

James – J2

15

9

08:00

R-Allen – J3

 

 

 

 

 

16

 

 

 

 

48

7

07:48

O’Neal – D

17

10

07:27

Perkins – 2nd of 2 FT

63

 

 

 

 

18

 

 

 

 

50

8

07:10

O’Neal – D

19

11

06:55

Rondo – DLU

65

 

 

 

 

20

 

 

 

 

 

9

06:37

James – J3

21

12

06:21

Pierce – J3

 

 

 

 

 

22

 

 

 

 

52

10

06:15

James – D

23

13

05:57

Rondo – LU

67

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

05:54

Time-out: Regular

 

8-13

62%

 

 

 

4-10

40%

 

LEGEND: J2 – 2 point jump shot; J3 – 3 point jump shot; LU – Layup; DLU – Driving layup; D – Dunk; FT – Free throw; B/S – Blocked shot; TO – Turnover; OPF – Offensive personal foul; Orb – Offensive rebound.

with Ray Allen [6 pts] and Rajon Rondo [8 pts] both inflicting damage.

5. Mike Brown chose not to use either Jamario Moon [i.e. Cleveland's 2nd best defender/rebounder] or Delonte West [i.e. Cleveland's 3ed best offensive player] during the entire 3rd quarter, in an effort to regain control of the game’s momentum from the surging Celtics.

6. Mike Brown chose not to use the Cavs’ best possible defensive/rebounding/transition line-up:

i.e. James/PG + Parker/OG + Moon/SF + Hickson/PF + Varejao/C

at any point in the 3rd quarter.

7. Doc Rivers made the decision to make only 2 substitutions during the 3rd quarter:

i. 3:47, when Glen Davis replaced Kendrick Perkins;

and,

ii. 00:50.9, when Tony Allen and Rasheed Wallace replaced Ray Allen and Kevin Garnett, respectively;

and rode the new “BIG 4″ for almost the entire frame, in order to preserve the 18 point lead which the C’s had managed to create for themselves.

============================

By this point in his career, there should be NO DOUBT whatsoever that LeBron James is plenty good enough to win a basketball game for his team on his own … provided that he is “on” his game that specific day.

However, the fact is …

Even NBA superstars can [and, sometimes, do] have certain days when they just don’t have “IT”; and, when one of those happens in the playoffs, against a quality opponent, it is up to their head coach to save the situation, by out-thinking and out-executing his counterpart for the opposition.

Unfortunately for the Cavaliers, and their fans, this did not happen in Game 5. 

Cleveland did not lose Game 5 due to LeBron James’ poor performance

Wednesday, May 12th, 2010

Many people are upset today with the way that LeBron James failed to step up to the challenge in last night’s Game 5 versus the Boston Celtics:

LeBron’s moment of truth awaits

What happened to LeBron James?

NBA Playoffs – LeBron James: Death of a Salesman

However, instead of being angry with Cleveland’s best player - and this year’s League MVP - these same individuals need to:

1. Take a closer look at what really happened in last night’s game, from an individual match-up perspective;

and, then,

2. Consider the way that Doc Rivers and Mike Brown handled their respective personnel, in comparison with Game 1, 2, 3 and, particularly, 4.

============================

PART A

Box Scores for Game 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5

CLEVELAND CAVALIERS

MINUTES PLAYED

No

Pos

Player

S-Ave

G1

G2

G3

G4

G5

Diff

P-Ave

STARTERS

1

PG

M Williams

34

40

35

34

36

34

 

36

2

OG

A Parker

28

26

28

34

42

40

Up

30

3

SF

L James

39

43

41

39

43

42

 

41

4

PF

A Jamison

32

37

36

29

37

31

 

34

5

C

S O’Neal

23

20

19

23

28

27

Up

22

KEY SUBS

6

PG/OG

D West

25

27

31

29

20

9

Down

25

7

SF

J Moon

17

9

7

8

3

7

Down

10

8

PF

JJ Hickson

21

12

19

16

5

4

Down

8

9

PF/C

A Varejao

28

22

21

17

25

17

Down

23

RESERVES/EXTRAS/OUTS

10

PG

S Telfair

 

11

PG

D Gibson

19

DNP

1

5

DNP

12

Up

5

12

OG/SF

D Green

 

13

OG/SF

J Williams

14

DNP

1

 

1

14

PF

L Powe

5

1

3

 

3

15

C

Z Ilgauskas

21

5

DNP

DNP

DNP

14

Up

9

RESULT

W

L

W

L

L

 

SCORE

101

86

124

87

88

 

 

            BOSTON CELTICS

MINUTES PLAYED

No

Pos

Player                 

S-Ave

G1

G2

G3

G4

G5

Diff

P-Ave

STARTERS

1

PG

R Rondo

37

42

45

35

47

38

 

42

2

OG

R Allen

35

44

39

35

38

38

 

37

3

SF

P Pierce

34

39

32

36

31

42

Up

37

4

PF

K Garnett

30

39

34

30

33

32

 

35  

5

C

K Perkins

28

32

30

21

24

24

Down

27

KEY SUBS

6

PG/OG

T Allen

16

14

15

18

26

21

Up

18

7

SF

M Daniels

18

2

6

7

DNP

3

 

5

8

PF

G Davis

17

12

13

18

19

21

Up

19

9

PF/C

R Wallace

22

13

18

15

20

13

Down

14

RESERVES/EXTRAS/OUTS

10

PG

N Robinson

15

DNP

1

13

DNP

3

 

5

11

G/F

M Finley

15

3

6

6

3

1

 

6

12

PF

S Williams

11

DNP

1

6

DNP

4

 

7

13

PF

B Scalabrine

9

 

14

G

O Lafayette

 

15

F

T Gaffney

 

RESULT

L

W

L

W

W

 

SCORE

93

104

95

97

120

 

 

LEGEND: S-Ave – Season average; P-Ave – Playoff average; Diff – Key difference from Game 5; G1 – Game 1; G2 – Game 2; G3 – Game 3; G4 – Game 4; G5 – Game 5.

 

———————————–

PART B

Cleveland’s Defense

Bad Defensive Lineup

  • Shaquille O’Neal = very poor defender
  • Antawn Jamison = atrocious defender
  • LeBron James = excellent defender
  • Anthony Parker = mediocre defender
  • Mo Williams = poor defender

That lineup is a below average defensive team. In that 16-20th range.

When Cleveland gives that lineup big minutes, they cannot be an elite defensive team. The best case scenario is a good defensive team (8th-to-12th) and they’ve failed to put the right lineups in to achieve even that (last night I mean, for the majority of the rest of the season they have done a serviceable enough job to be in the 11-13th range).

Cleveland should not be considered a high quality defensive team when that starting lineup is playing long minutes.

Compounding Lineups’ Weaknesses

By putting Mo Williams on Ray Allen + Anthony Parker on Rajon Rondo, the Cavs slightly below average defensive lineup becomes comparable to one of the five worst defensive teams in the league.

It gives Boston matchup advantages at:

  • Individual matchup advantages at the PG position (Rondo vs Parker) + the off guard position (Mo vs Ray) + and at the PF position (Jamison vs Garnett).
    • In drive and kicks (jump shooters) + drive and dumps (finishers in the paint) from a playmaking point guard. As well as the usual scoring opportunities.
    • A huge advantage from shot creation out of Ray Allen (fourth option, limited at creating his own shot attempts at this stage in his career)
    • An advantage in the post with Garnett and Jamison that requires instant double teams.
  • Pick and roll offense
  • Transition offense

All of those defensive holes play into Boston’s strengths and become huge liabilities for the Cavaliers and make them the equivalent of a bottom five defensive team in this league.

Top Defensive Lineup

  • Jamario Moon vs Rajon Rondo
  • Delonte West vs Ray Allen
  • LeBron James vs Paul Pierce
  • JJ Hickson vs Kendrick Perkins
  • Anderson Varejao vs Kevin Garnett

That lineup is a very good-to-excellent defensive lineup.

It’s also a good rebounding lineup + their best transition lineup (weakness to strength) + a very good offensive lineup.

============================

Unfortunately for LeBron James and the rest of the Cavaliers, when Mike Brown makes these types of erroneous in-game decisions, concerning the PT of his starters and key substitutes, it indicates clearly that he is still far from being ready to lead his team to victory in the NBA Finals. 

Coaching, sample sizes and adjustments

Wednesday, April 28th, 2010

3 weeks ago …

You were told in this space that the proper way for the Los Angeles Lakers to solve their problems this season would be to use Kobe Bean Bryant in a specific role:

Solving the Lakers’ problems with the Spurs, Apr 6 2010

Last week …

You were told in this space that the outcome of a playoff series can sometimes be determined by the ability of a team to make the correct game-to-game … and, THEN, in-game … adjustments, based on what its opponent’s specific strengths and weaknesses are and the best possible use of its own personnel:

Making the correct game-to-game adjustments can be THE difference between Winning and Losing in the Playoffs, Apr 23 2010

So much of what can be found on-line today concerning supposedly sound “basketball analysis” is little more than gobbledygook put forth by statistical gurus without a proper understanding of, 

How the NBA game actually works.”

===================================

Oklahoma City Thunder 87
LOS ANGELES LAKERS 111
Complete Series Info

 

===================================

The fact is …

1. Sample sizes are rendered virtually meaningless;

2. League-wide averages are rendered virtually meaningless; and,

3. Creating and minimizing individual mis-matches against the best teams in the league – and a particular opponent of high calibre – are absolutely crucial;

 … when it comes to determining accurately which teams, coaches and, therefore, players will advance in the playoffs, or not.

====================================

During the pre-season …

You were told in this space that the 2009-2010 NBA championship would, in all likelihood, be won by 1 of the following 5 teams:

EASTERN CONFERENCE
Orlando Magic
Cleveland Cavaliers
Boston Celtics [i.e. depending upon the recovery of Kevin Garnett from injury]

WESTERN CONFERENCE
Los Angeles Lakers
San Antonio Spurs

Nothing which has happened since that time has fundamentally changed that perception. 

Right now …

The 4 best teams in the Eastern Conference are the Cleveland Cavaliers [4-1], Orlando Magic [4-0], Boston Celtics [4-1] and Atlanta Hawks [2-2].

The 4 best teams in the Western Conference are the Los Angeles Lakers [3-2], San Antonio Spurs [3-2], Utah Jazz [3-1] and Phoenix Suns [3-2].

===================================

Barring any further major injuries …

This year’s NBA champions will, in all likelihood, be 1 of the following 3 teams:

Los Angeles Lakers, Phil Jackson [and Mitch Kupchak and Dr. Jerry Buss]
Orlando Magic, Stan Van Gundy [and Otis Smith and Richard DeVos]
San Antonio Spurs, Gregg Popovich [and RC Buford and Peter Holt]

… none of which happens to be the Cleveland Cavaliers with Mike Brown [and Danny Ferry and Daniel Gilbert].

Basketball is the ultimate TEAM Sport … with each player on the court having to be able to function adequately on Offense, on Defense, and in terms of Rebounding, in conjunction with the sound strategic and tactical decision-making skills of an elite level head coach, general manager and owner.

Those who think that basketball can be properly understood by examining the statistical norms, averages, outliers, etc., associated with representative “sample sizes”, “numerical formulas”, and all manner of “efficiency ratings,” are simply wasting their [and your] time.

Basketball is a game of:

I. Acumen;

and,

II. Inches;

… the most important of which are the “approximately 6″ located between the ears of a team’s owner, general manager, head coach and 8-9 regular rotation players.

Related:

Kobe Bryant, Closer to the ground

Every Move Must Have A Purpose