Posts Tagged ‘LA Lakers’

Reviewing Raptors’ results, thus far [Games 1-16]

Thursday, November 26th, 2009

In the off season … and, despite what you were told by a variety of other observers, to the contrary … this corner indicated that there had NOT really been that much improvement from a player personnel and coaching standpoint with the 2009-2010 version of the Toronto Raptors, in spite of the radical roster make-over, compared with the other 29 teams in the NBA and, specifically, their competitors in the Eastern Conference.

Raptors improvement relative to other teams in division & conference [Sep 14 2009]

How the Eastern Conference looks for ‘09-10, based on individual player ratings, by position [Sep 08 2009]

Raptors Bench Strength: In eye of beholder [Aug 28 2009]

Strength of the Eastern Conference compared to 2006-2007 [Aug 25]

When you examine the early season results …

RAPTORS 2009-2010 SCHEDULE [GAMES 1-16]

GAME

W-L

WINS

LOSSES

 

Home

Away

Home

Away

1

1-0

Cle/11-4 *

 

 

 

2

1-1

 

 

 

MEM/5-10

3

1-2

 

 

Orl/11-4

 

4

2-2

Det/5-10

 

 

 

5

3-2

 

NOH/7-9 ^

 

 

6

3-3

 

 

 

DAL/11-4

7

3-4

 

 

 

SAS/7-6

8

4-4

Chi/6-7

 

 

 

9

5-4

 

LAC/6-10

 

 

10

5-5

 

 

 

PHO/12-3

11

5-6

 

 

 

DEN/11-4

12

5-7

 

 

 

UTA/7-7

13

6-7

Mia/9-5

 

 

 

14

6-8

 

 

Orl/11-4

 

15

7-8

Ind/6-8

 

 

 

16

7-9

 

 

 

CHA/5-9

Sub-total

37-34/.521

13-19/.406

22-8/.733

58-43/.574

Total

50-53/.485

80-51/.611

Legend: * - Erred by using S-O’Neal and Z-Ilgauskas together; ^ - In the process of firing their head coach; Lighter Shade – High Quality; Darker Shade – Low Quality.

what you should be able to see is that:

1. The Raptors are STILL losing games to the better [>.500] teams in the NBA;

2. The Raptors are STILL winning games against the poorer [<.500] teams in the NBA; 

3. The Raptors are STILL a fairly good Home team;

4. The Raptors are STILL a fairly poor Away team;

5. The Raptors are STILL losing Away games against opponents that are good defensive and rebounding teams;

6. The Raptors are STILL winning an occasional Home game against a quality opponent [>.500];

7. The Raptors are STILL losing a high percentage of their Away games against a quality opponent [>.500].

Until the focus of the Raptors’ Management Team shifts away from:

“Playing an entertaining, high-scoring brand of fast-paced basketball which is capable of being ‘competitive’ on a game-to-game basis, winning a fair share of regular season games but without being able to advance very far in the playoffs due to a lack of defense and rebounding,” 

to

“Playing a brand of basketball which is well-balanced … i.e. evenly distributed between Offense, Defense and Rebounding … and thoroughly committed to competing for and eventually winning a League Championship, through the acquisition of the required number of High End players, and coaches, and scouts, and support staff, etc., it takes to accomplish THIS SPECIFIC GOAL, as a bottom line objective,”

there is little REAL reason to believe that the Raptors are anything more than a perennial Treadmill Team with the primary intention of making a bottom-line profit for its ownership group.

“Window dressing” does not take you to the upper echelon of the NBA.

Only an emphasis on Team Defense, Rebounding, Shared Team Offense AND a COMMITMENT TO WINNING IT ALL can accomplish THAT specific objective.

When you peel away the layers …

Tuesday, November 24th, 2009

and, for no specific reason other than it’s a tonne of fun to watch …

———————————–

 

———————————–

in the aftermath of this interview, it’s almost impossible not to cheer for Ron-Ron … and his band of [athleticized] Merry [Mad] Men, with fresh visions of [post-shower] “steam rising from their shoulders” [ala the Hulk?] and ”hearts and kisses floating above their heads”.

——————————

What yours truly will think of from now on when the image of Ron-Ron “in his [Boxer's] shorts” on The Jimmy Kimmel Show comes to mind:

I am just a poor boy
Though my story’s seldom told
I have squandered my resistance
For a pocket full of mumbles such are promises
All lies and jests
Still a man hears what he wants to hear
And disregards the rest …

Truly, one … of … a … kind.

Where the Raptors rate right now, compared to the best teams in the NBA

Tuesday, November 17th, 2009

When ESPN and NBA.com publish weekly “power rankings”, it can be easy for casual fans to get swept away and begin to think that their favourite team might be better than it actually is, and in the process of becoming a legitimate contender.

However …

When you take a more in-depth look some of the specific factors which contribute to a team’s real ability, in this regard, relative to its opponents, what you should be able to see for yourself is a slightly different picture:

Legit Contenders For The NBA Championship: PART I

Updating these “unbiased” numbers through the games played as of Sunday, November 15, 2009 reveals that the Toronto Raptors remain exactly where they were the week before, i.e. occupying the #25 slot in the Association.

Quality Index Ranking [QIR]

1. Portland Trail Blazers, 8-3/.727 | QR = 5
2. Boston Celtics, 8-3/.727 | QR = 18
3. Milwaukee Bucks, 5-2/.714 | QR = 19
3. Miami Heat, 7-2/.778 | QR = 19
5. Dallas Mavericks, 7-3, .700 | QR = 21
6. Atlanta Hawks, 8-2/.800 | QR = 27
7. Oklahoma City Thunder, 5-5/.500 | QR = 28
8. Cleveland Cavaliers, 7-3/.700 | QR = 30
9. Charlotte Bobcats, 3-6/.333 | QR = 32
10. Detroit Pistons, 5-5/.500 | QR = 34
———————————————
11. Orlando Magic, 7-3/.700 | QR = 39
====================================
12. Chicago Bulls, 5-4/.556 | QR = 40
13. Phoenix Suns, 9-2/.818 | QR = 45
13. Indiana Pacers, 4-3/.571 | QR = 45
15. Utah Jazz, 4-6/.400 | QR = 46
16. LA Lakers, 7-3/.700 | QR = 48
16. Denver Nuggets, 7-3/.700 | QR = 48
16. Sacramento Kings, 5-4/.556 | QR = 48
19. San Antonio Spurs, 4-4/.500 | QR = 49
20. Washington Wizards, 2-7/.222 | QR = 51
21. Houston Rockets, 6-4/.600 | QR = 54
22. Memphis Grizzlies, 2-8/.200 | QR = 58
23. LA Clippers, 4-7/.364 | QR = 62
24. Philadelphia 76ers, 4-6/.400 | QR = 66
25. Toronto Raptors, 5-5/.500 | QR = 67
25. New Jersey Nets, 1-10/.000 | QR = 67
27. New Orleans Hornets, 3-8/.273 | QR = 78 
28. Minnesota Timberwolves, 1-10/.091 | QR = 79
29. Golden State Warriors, 3-6/.333 | QR = 80
30. New York Knicks, 1-9/.100 | QR = 86

On an annual basis … teams that lead the league in:

* Points Differential, accumulate the most regular season W’s. Toronto is #17.

* Points Scored Allowed, have the ability to limit their opponent’s offensive productivity at crunch time. Toronto is #26.

* Rebounding Differential have the level of physicality required to advance in the post-season, when the outcome of games becomes a battle of collective will. Toronto is #24.

In each of these specific areas, the simple fact is that … the Raptors still have a long way to go before they can be considered a legitimate contender this season.

Expected Total Wins in the Western Conference

Wednesday, October 14th, 2009

When the Expected Total Wins first get set across the board in the NBA, it can be an early indication of perceived Power Rankings for the coming season.

1 LA Lakers OVER 62, -108

2 San Antonio Spurs OVER 54.5, -108

3 Portland Trail Blazers OVER 52.5, -127

4 Denver Nuggets OVER 52.5, -108

5 Utah Jazz OVER 49.5, -108

6 Dallas Mavericks OVER 48.5, -108

7 New Orleans Hornets OVER 46.5, -102

8 Phoenix Suns OVER 41.5, -108

9 Houston Rockets OVER 35.5, -127
10 Golden State Warriors OVER 35.5, -108
11 Oklahoma City Thunder OVER 35.5, +105
12 LA Clippers OVER 34.5, +105
13 Memphis Grizzlies OVER 27.5, -108
14 Minnesota Timberwolves OVER -25.5, -160
15 Sacramento Kings OVER 24.5, -123

————————————————————-

Who knows more about the day-to-day goings-on in the world of professional sports?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

————————————————————-

You’re invited to elaborate on your opinion in the comments section. 

Early look at NBA rosters: Western Conference

Tuesday, August 18th, 2009

While the few teams at the top continue to get richer …

Tier 1 – Elite/Championship Contenders

 

TEAM

COACH

PG

OG

SF

PF

C

LAL

65 W

Jackson

Fisher

Bryant

Artest

Gasol

Bynum

Farmar

Brown

Vujacic

Walton

Morrison

Odom

 

Powell

Mbenga

Elonu **

SAS

54

Popovich

 

Parker

Finley

Jefferson

McDyess

Duncan

Hill

Mason

Vaughn ?

De Colo **

McClinton **

Hairston

 

 

Ginobili X

Hairston

Udoka ?

Williams

Blair

Bonner

Haislip

 

Mahinmi

Ratliff

 

 

Tier 2A – Playoff Contenders

 

TEAM

COACH

PG

OG

SF

PF

C

DEN

54 W

Karl

Billups

Smith

Anthony

Martin

Nene

Lawson

Carter

Hart ?

Afflao

Kleiza ?

Balkman

Allen

Anderson

Petro ?

POR

54 W

McMillan

 

Blake

Roy

Batum

Aldridge

Przybilla

Miller

Mills **

Webster X

Bayless

Fernandez

Claver **

Outlaw

Cunningham **

Randolph ?

LaFraentz ?

Oden

Ruffin ?

Pendergraph **

HOU

53 W

Adelman

Brooks

McGrady X

Ariza

Battier

Scola

Lowry

Taylor

Budinger

 

Barry

White

Landry

Hayes

Dorsey

Llull **

Anderson

Cook

Ming *

Mutumbo *

DAL

50

Carlisle

 

Kidd

Howard

Marion

Nowitzki

Dampier

Terry

Barea

Beaubois

Calathes **

Buckner

Carroll

Ross

Green ?

Gooden

Humphries

Thomas

Singleton

Jawai

Williams

Nivins

 

NOH

49 W

Scott

Paul

Stojakovic

Posey

West

Okafor

Daniels

Collison

Brown

Thornton

Wright

Peterson

Diogu

Marks ?

Bowen ?

Armstrong

Ely ?

UTA

48 W

Sloan

Williams

Miles

Brewer

Boozer

Okur

Price

Maynor

Knight ?

Korver

Almond ?

 

Kirilenko

Harpring

Millsap

Suton **

Koufos

Fesenko

Collins ?

PHO

46 W

Gentry

Nash

Richardson

Hill

Amundson

Stoudemire X

Dragic

Barbosa

Tucker

Clark

Pavlovic

Griffin

Frye

Dudley

Lopez

 

 

Tier 2B – Possible Playoff Contenders

 

GSW

29 W

Nelson

Ellis

Curry

Maggette

Jackson

Biedrins

CJ Watson ?

Claxton

Law

Morrow

Azubuike

George

Randolph

Wright

Kurz ?

Turiaf

OKC

23 W

Brooks

Westbrook

Weaver

Durant

Green

Collison

Ollie

Livingston

Harden

Vaden **

Sefolosha

Mason ?

 

Ibaka

Thomas

White

Rose ?

Krstic

Mullens

Swift ?

LAC

19 W

Dunleavy

Davis-B

Gordon

Thornton

Griffin

Kaman

Telfair

Collins

Butler

Acker ?

Davis-R

Jones ?

Smith

Madsen

Novak ?

Camby

Jordan

Skinner ?

 

 

 

 

and those in the bottom tier …

 

Tier 3 – High Variable/Non Payoff Contenders

 

MEM

24 W

Hollins

Conley

Mayo

Gay

Randolph

Gasol

Jaric

Williams

 

Young

Carroll

Arthur

Thabeet

Haddadi

Hunter

MIN

24 W

Rambis

Flynn

Brown

Brewer X

Love

Jefferson X

Atkins

Rubio **

Ellington

Wilkens

Carney ?

Gomes

Songaila

Cardinal

Norel **

Hollins

Pecherov

Blount

Collins ?

SAC

17 W

Westphal

Evans

Martin

Nocioni

Thompson

Hawes

Rodriguez

Udrih

Jackson ?

Garcia

McCants ?

Thomas

Simmons ?

Casspi

May

Brockman **

Green

Booth ?

 

 

————————————————————————

LEGEND:

Bold – New Player Added via trade; Bold Italics – New Player Added via NBA Draft; Underlined – Resigned Own Free Agent; Bold Underlined – New Player Added via Free Agent Signing; ? – Unsigned Free Agent; ?? – Unsigned Restricted Free Agent; X – Player Returning From Injury; * - Status for this in-question due to injury/personal concerns; ** - Unsigned Draft Pick; Q – New Player Added via reported trade.

———————————————————————–

continue spinning their wheels.

5 down … and counting

Monday, November 10th, 2008

FINAL SCORE: Lakers 111, Rockets 82 [Nov 9]
Game Info

Nuff said.

—————————–

Please recall …

This is a special team [May 30, 2008]

70+ Wins and the 2008-2009 NBA Championship was the forecast for this Lakers’ team PRIOR to their loss in the NBA Finals last season. :-)
—————————–

Offense, Defense & Rebounding … balanced and in harmony.

Rebounding Differential Rankings in the NBA [Nov 6]

Friday, November 7th, 2008

When this corner of the sports blogosphere told you earlier this fall/summer that the Raptors trade for Jermaine O’Neal was not going to be enough, by itself, to fundamentally improve Toronto’s Rebounding Deficiency from the last few seasons there were boatloads of delusional fans some who did not want to believe this specific assessment of this team, in advance of actually seeing real live NBA games this season with their own two eyes.

—————–

How could the acquisition of a former 6-time NBA All-Star …

in exchange for a smallish, erractic [but talented] Point Guard [i.e. TJ Ford], an over-the-hill, lumbering, strictly speaking part-time Center [i.e. Rasho Nesterovic], the 15th player from their roster last season [i.e. Maceo Baston], and a flip-flop of the No. 17 [overall] and No. 41 Draft Picks from the 2008 NBA Draft, who turned out to be Roy Hibbert [C] and Nathan Jawai [C], respectively …

possibly NOT improve the Raptors decidely mediocre rebounding numbers from the last few years in any significant way, shape or form?

—————–

Well … as of Thursday, November 6, 2008 the Basketball Acumen of this specific correspondent seems to be as sharp [and accurate] as ever:

[Statistics from NBA.com]

NBA

Rebounding Differential

Per Game

2008-2009

[as of Thu Nov 6]

Rank

Team

+/-

1

L.A. Lakers

+12.25

2

Detroit

+11.00

 

Philadelphia

+11.00

4

Cleveland

+9.00

5

Phoenix

+5.20

6

Utah

+5.00

7

Atlanta

+3.66

8

Boston

+2.40

 

Milwaukee

+2.40

10

Golden State

+0.40

 

Portland

+0.40

12

Orlando

+0.20

13

Charlotte

-0.25

14

Chicago

-0.60

15

Houston

-1.40

16

New Jersey

-1.66

17

Sacramento

-1.80

18

Memphis

-2.00

19

Oklahoma City

-2.25

20

New Orleans

-3.00

21

Denver

-3.50

 

Minnesota

-3.50

23

Dallas

-3.75

24

Miami

-4.00

25

San Antonio

-4.25

26

Indiana

-4.66

27

Washington

-7.33

28

New York

-8.75

29

L.A. Clippers

-9.00

30

Toronto

-10.50

When a certain NBA observer tells you something about ‘How the Game actually Works in this League’, in advance … it might well be in your best interests to believe what this person has to say, even though you are not able to fully comprehend it, at that point in time.

—————–

“The proof of the pudding is in the eating.” - Anonymous

Comprehending pre-season standings in the NBA

Friday, October 24th, 2008

The NBA’s pre-season schedule of games is rapidly coming to a close.

In general, how a team fares in its pre-season games … in this League, at least … provides a preliminary indication of where it actually stands, relative to the competition, heading into the new campaign.

Annually, there are three major categories of teams in the NBA:

1. Above .549 [High End]
2. .450-.549 [Middle]
3. Below .450 [Low End]

——————————————-

When you examine the current standings for the pre-season: 

2008-2009 Conference Preseason Standings
Eastern Conference
Eastern W L PCT GB CONF DIV HOME ROAD L 10 STREAK
Orlando 6 1 0.857 0.0 4-1 4-1 3-1 3-0 6-1 W 6
Boston 6 2 0.750 0.5 5-2 3-2 3-1 3-1 6-2 W 2
Detroit 6 2 0.750 0.5 5-1 3-0 3-2 3-0 6-2 L 1
Atlanta 5 3 0.625 1.5 4-1 3-1 1-2 4-1 5-3 W 1
Philadelphia 4 3 0.571 2.0 4-3 4-1 1-2 3-1 4-3 W 1
Indiana 4 4 0.500 2.5 1-0 1-0 3-1 1-3 4-4 W 1
New York 3 3 0.500 2.5 3-3 3-3 0-2 3-1 3-3 L 1
Toronto 4 4 0.500 2.5 1-1 1-1 2-3 2-1 4-4 L 2
Chicago 3 4 0.429 3.0 0-1 0-1 1-3 2-1 3-4 W 2
New Jersey 2 4 0.333 3.5 1-4 0-4 1-3 1-1 2-4 L 4
Washington 2 4 0.333 3.5 0-1 0-0 0-2 2-2 2-4 W 1
Cleveland 2 5 0.286 4.0 2-3 0-1 1-3 1-2 2-5 L 1
Miami 1 5 0.167 4.5 0-3 0-1 1-3 0-2 1-5 L 1
Milwaukee 1 6 0.143 5.0 0-2 0-2 1-3 0-3 1-6 L 2
Charlotte 0 8 0.000 6.5 0-4 0-4 0-2 0-6 0-8 L 8
Western Conference
Western W L PCT GB CONF DIV HOME ROAD L 10 STREAK
New Orleans 7 0 1.000 0.0 2-0 1-0 4-0 3-0 7-0 W 7
Minnesota 6 2 0.750 1.5 2-1 2-1 3-1 3-1 6-2 W 1
Denver 4 1 0.800 2.0 2-1 2-1 3-0 1-1 4-1 W 1
Houston 5 2 0.714 2.0 5-0 3-0 3-1 2-1 5-2 W 3
L.A. Lakers 5 2 0.714 2.0 1-2 1-1 5-2 0-0 5-2 W 5
Phoenix 5 2 0.714 2.0 3-0 1-0 2-1 3-1 5-2 W 3
Golden State 4 2 0.667 2.5 2-1 0-0 3-0 1-2 4-2 W 2
L.A. Clippers 4 3 0.571 3.0 2-2 2-1 0-3 4-0 4-3 L 2
Portland 4 3 0.571 3.0 3-3 0-2 2-2 2-1 4-3 L 1
Utah 4 3 0.571 3.0 3-2 2-1 1-1 3-2 4-3 W 2
Dallas 4 4 0.500 3.5 1-0 0-0 2-2 2-2 4-4 L 2
San Antonio 3 3 0.500 3.5 0-2 0-2 1-2 2-1 3-3 L 1
Memphis 2 6 0.250 5.5 0-2 0-2 2-2 0-4 2-6 L 4
Oklahoma City 1 5 0.167 5.5 0-4 0-1 0-1 1-4 1-5 L 2
Sacramento 1 7 0.125 6.5 1-7 0-2 1-3 0-4 1-7 L 6

——————————————

what you see, with only 4 days left, is generally speaking fairly representative of what you should now expect to get over the course of the 82-game regular season from these teams, in a broad sense.

EASTERN CONFERENCE

Above .549
Orlando, Detroit, Boston, Atlanta, Philadelphia

.450-.549
Indiana, New York, Toronto

Below .450
Chicago, New Jersey, Washington [playing without Arenas], Cleveland [playing few minutes with LBJ] , Miami, Milwaukee, Charlotte

WESTERN CONFERENCE

Above .549
New Orleans, Minnesota, Denver, Houston, LA Lakers, Phoenix, Golden State, LA Clippers, Portland, Utah

.450-.549
Dallas, San Antonio [playing without Ginobili]

Below .450
Memphis, Oklahoma City, Sacramento

——————————————-

Although it’s not uncommon for a team to shift from the High End to the Middle over the course of the regular season; it is rare for a team to move from the High End to the Low End … and vice versa … once the regular season starts unless, of course, it has to play [or is playing currently] without 1 or more of its marquee players for an extending number of games.

What is usually the most interesting thing to see, however, over the course of the 82-game regular season, is which few teams are able to elevate their performance (i) from the Middle into the High End, and (ii) from the Low End into the Middle … automatically making them one of the ‘Feel Good’ stories of the year; and, which few teams, if any, will go in the opposite direction … automatically making them one of the ‘Biggest Disappointment’ stories.

Into which specific category does it look as though your favourite team is going to fit this season?

High End now that stays in the High End
High End now that drops down into the Middle
Middle now that steps up into the High End
Middle now that stays in the Middle
Middle now that drops down into the Low End
Low End now that steps up into the Middle
Low End now that stays in the Low End

NBA Playoffs Preview (2007-2008)

Friday, April 18th, 2008

After a scintilating regular season schedule which saw:

* The single greatest W-L turn-around in the history of the NBA
* The 2nd Longest Winning Streak in the history of the NBA
* The fiercest battle to make the Western Conference Playoffs in the history of the NBA
* 3 seismic shifting in-season trades involving marquee players
* The Resurgence of the NBA’s two most notable franchises

What could possibly lie ahead in the post-season?

1st Round match-ups begin later today … Where Amazing Happens!

Eastern Conference


(1) BOSTON CELTICS (H)

(8 ) ATLANTA HAWKS

By the Numbers

QIR - #1 (6)
Points Differential Rank - #1
Points Allowed Rank - #2
Rebounding Differential Rank - #3

QIR – #13 (43)
Points Differential Rank- #19
Points Allowed Rank - #15
Rebounding Differential Rank - #9

Basketball Acumen

The best Defense in the NBA. Committed to Rebounding. Share the ball on Offense as well as any team in the league. 3 All-Star players (i.e. Garnett, Pierce & Allen-R) and a plethora of effective ‘role guys’ off the bench. Have everything it takes to win the NBA championship this year. The clear-cut favourite.

Return to the post-season after a 9-year absence. Solid ‘Starting 5’ (i.e. Bibby, Johnson, Smith, Williams & Horford) and a commitment to Rebounding. Bench players are not strong enough to compete successfully at this level. Will be fortunate to win a game. A major underdog.

Who will win

Boston in 4 … although the Hawks will put up a solid fight in their home games (25-16).

 

(4) CLEVELAND CAVALIERS (H)

(5) WASHINGTON WIZARDS

By the Numbers

QIR - #8 (26)
Points Differential Rank - #16
Points Allowed Rank - #9
Rebounding Differential Rank - #1

QIR – #12 (41)
Points Differential Rank- #15
Points Allowed Rank - #12
Rebounding Differential Rank - #14

Basketball Acumen

Despite the presence of Lebron James, have regressed as a group from last season, especially on Defense. Verajao & Pavlovic still not fully recovered from early-season holdouts. Rebounding is still first rate. Excellent depth in the front-court.  Lack cohesiveness overall and are stagnant on Offense (i.e. dependent on LBJ). Not as quick or as hungry as last year’s team.

Under-rated as group. Roster filled with athletic, talented and hard-working players with good length. Versatile. Can create match-up advantages at each of the 5 positions, depending on need. 3 top notch Scorers (i.e. Butler, Jamison & Arenas), several good Defenders (i.e. Daniels, Steveson & Haywood) and a willingness to Rebound, as a team.

Who will win

Washington in 6 … if Butler, Jamison & Arenas are all healthy (i.e. 25+ MPG).


 

(2) DETROIT PISTONS (H)

(7) PHILADELPHIA 76ERS

By the Numbers

QIR - #2 (10)
Points Differential Rank - #2
Points Allowed Rank - #1
Rebounding Differential Rank - #7

QIR – #9 (27)
Points Differential Rank- #14
Points Allowed Rank - #12
Rebounding Differential Rank - #6

Basketball Acumen

Deep, athletic, talented roster. Solid blend of vets & kids. Control the tempo as well as any squad in the league. Team Defense and Rebounding are first rate. High efficiency Offense. Will make the extra pass, repeatedly. Will go as far as, Billups & Wallace will take them. Clear-cut 2nd choice in the East to reach the Finals.

Under-rated as a group. Athletic & physical with a solid commitment to Rebounding and Team Defense. 2nd half surge keyed by solid contributions from youngsters Young-T, Williams-L, Carney-R and Smith-J. Bench is strong enough to compete successfully at this level. Unfortunate to be match-up against the Pistons.

Who will win

Detroit in 5 … although the Sixers might be talented enough to force a Game 6.


 

(3) ORLANDO MAGIC (H)

(6) TORONTO RAPTORS

By the Numbers

QIR - #11 (32)
Points Differential Rank - #5
Points Allowed Rank - #11
Rebounding Differential Rank - #16

QIR – #14 (44)
Points Differential Rank- #12
Points Allowed Rank - #10
Rebounding Differential Rank - #22

Basketball Acumen

Points Differential Rank is keyed by 3pt shooting & number of trips to the FT line.  Team Defense and Rebounding are solid; not spectacular. Offense is inside out, with D12 & a host of capable ‘Marksmen’. Will go as far as Turkoglu, Lewis, Bogans, Evans & Dooling will take them. Must minimize TO’s by Nelson & Arroyo.

3 solid players (i.e. Bosh, Calderon & Nesterovic) plus an erratic ‘Group of Seven’ (erstwhile individual artists known as TJ, AP, ‘the Mad Argentine’, ‘the Shootist’, Apollo33, Hump & Il Mago). At ‘the top’ of the league in 3pt shooting %; at ‘the bottom’ in FTA/game. Rebounding & Team Defense are weaknesses. Capable of winning this series … if Orlando mis-fires.

Who will win

Orlando in 7 … although Stan Van Gundy might be good enough to wrap it up in fewer.

 

Western Conference


(1) L.A. LAKERS (H)

(8 ) DENVER NUGGETS

By the Numbers

QIR - #10 (30)
Points Differential Rank - #3
Points Allowed Rank - #19
Rebounding Differential Rank - #8

QIR – #19 (61)
Points Differential Rank- #11
Points Allowed Rank - #29
Rebounding Differential Rank - #21

Basketball Acumen

When healthy: (i) the deepest, most talented team in the NBA; and, (ii) the best Offense in the league. Rebounding is solid. Team Defense depends on the availability of Bynum. With AB, it is first rate; without him, it is not good enough to win the title this year. Will be a force for years to come, if found wanting this go round. Fisher’s stability is the key.

Offensive pyrotechnics from Iverson, Melo, J.R. & Kleiza. Defense & Rebounding are strictly second rate, despite the individual work of Camby, Najera & K-Mart. The ‘little boys in blue’ of the NBA. When good, they’re good; when bad they’re really bad … frequently within the same game. Enough talent to lose 4 single-digit games.

Who will win

L.A. in 5 … although without Bynum the Nuggets might win 2 home games.

 

 

(5) HOUSTON ROCKETS (H)

(4) UTAH JAZZ

By the Numbers

QIR - #3 (15)
Points Differential Rank - #9
Points Allowed Rank - #4
Rebounding Differential Rank - #2

QIR – #4 (21)
Points Differential Rank- #4
Points Allowed Rank - #13
Rebounding Differential Rank - #4

Basketball Acumen

The best Defense in the NBA. Committed to Rebounding. Share the ball on Offense as well as any team in the league. 3 All-Star players (i.e. Garnett, Pierce & Allen-R) and a plethora of effective ‘role guys’ off the bench. Have everything it takes to win the NBA championship this year. Clear-cut favourites.

The best home record in the NBA (37-4). PG (Williams-D) is first rate. Deep & physical team. Committed to Rebounding. Bench players are first rate. Struggle on the road this year, without the leadership of Fisher-D, with the 2nd unit. High % Offense must get solid 3pt shooting from Okor & Korver. Team Defense can be erratic away from home.

Who will win

Utah in 6 … although the Rockets are ‘tough enough’ to win a game 7 this year.

 

 

(2) NEW ORLEANS HORNETS (H)

(7) DALLAS MAVERICKS

By the Numbers

QIR – #4 (21)
Points Differential Rank - #6
Points Allowed Rank - #5
Rebounding Differential Rank - #10

QIR – #4 (21)
Points Differential Rank- #10
Points Allowed Rank - #6
Rebounding Differential Rank - #5

Basketball Acumen

PG, Chris Paul, is first rate. Team Defense is solid. Committed to Rebounding. Share the ball on Offense, led by the mastery of CP3.  Must get high % outside shooting from Peja S, to spread the floor. Lacking playoff experience. Will go as far as David West (their 2nd all-star caliber player) & Byron Scott (matching wits vs Avery Johnson), will take them. Can win the series … if it gets to game 7.

Get the best possible match-up for their team, in the 1st round. Bitterly remember last year’s embarrassing loss to G-State. Ready for bear this go round. Rebounding is solid. Team Defense is solid. Must control the Offensive tempo. Bench is solid. Can beat anyone in the Western Conference … except L.A. & San Antonio (when those two squads are healthy).

Who will win

Dallas in 6 … as the Hornets have to learn how to lose first before they can win.

   
 
  

(3) SAN ANTONIO SPURS (H)

(6) PHOENIX SUNS

By the Numbers

QIR - #7 (23)
Points Differential Rank - #8
Points Allowed Rank - #3
Rebounding Differential Rank - #12

QIR – #16 (57)
Points Differential Rank- #7
Points Allowed Rank - #25
Rebounding Differential Rank - #25

Basketball Acumen

Key injuries to Duncan, Parker & Ginobili have affected their customary regular season efficiency. When healthy, still as good Defensively & Rebounding as any squad in the NBA. Always make the extra pass on Offense.  A bevy of effective ‘role guys’ off the bench. Have everything it takes to win the NBA championship again this year, if healthy.

A better chance of winning the title than prior editions, with a stronger commitment to Team Defense & Rebounding than before. Unfortunately, for the Suns, each of the other top teams in the West has improved more than Phoenix, whose high efficiency Offense remains the strength of the team. The Suns are finally moving in the right direction but their window of opportunity is closing quickly.

Who will win

San Antonio in 7 … although it could be fewer, pending Grant Hill’s injury status.

Enjoy what should be absolutely terrific basketball!

Legitimate Contenders in the NBA: Part V

Friday, April 18th, 2008

The NBA Playoffs start tomorrow afternoon and the final Quality Ratings (QR) & Quality Index Rankings (QIR) for the 2007-2008 regular season are now etched in stone.

NBA Playoff Teams 2007-2008
Quality Rating & Quality Index Rankings   
(End of Regular Season)

TEAM

W-L

Win%

PDR

PAR

RDR

QR

QIR

EC

WC

Boston

66-16

.805 ↑

1

2

3

6

1

1

 

Detroit

59-23

.720 ↑

2

1

7

10

2

2

 

Houston

55-27

.671 ↑

9

4

2

15

3

 

5

New Orleans

56-26

.683 ↓

6

5

10

21

T-4

 

2

Dallas

51-31

.622 ↓

10

6

5

21

T-4

 

7

Utah

54-28

.659 −

4

13

4

21

T-4

 

4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

San Antonio

56-26

.683 ↓

8

3

12

23

7

 

3

Cleveland

45-37

.549 ↓

16

9

1

26

8

4

 

Philadelphia

40-42

.488 ↓

14

7

6

27

9

7

 

LA Lakers

57-25

.695 ↑

3

19

8

30

10

 

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Orlando

52-30

.634 ↑

5

11

16

32

11

3

 

Atlanta

37-45

.451 ↓

19

15

9

43

13

8

 

Washington

43-39

.524 ↑

15

12

14

41

12

5

 

Toronto

41-41

.500 ↓

12

10

22

44

14

6

 

Phoenix

55-27

.671 ↑

7

25

25

57

15

 

6

Denver

50-32

.610 −

11

29

21

61

16

 

8

 Legend:
W-L – Won Loss Record; Win% - Winning Percentage; PDR – Points Differential Rank; PAR – Points Allowed Rank; RDR – Rebound Differential Rank; QR – Quality Rating; QIR – Quality Index Ranking; EC – Eastern Conference Playoff Position; WC – Western Conference Playoff Position 
Note:

1. Since 2000-2001 each NBA Champion and Finalist has had a QR ≤ 34.
2. Since 2000-2001 each NBA Champion has had a QIR ≤ #9.
3. Since 2000-2001 6 of the 7 NBA Champions have had a QIR ≤ #4. 

What it takes to win the NBA Championship

According to the QIR, there’s a solid chance that this year’s eventual NBA champion will be one of (1) Boston, (2) Detroit, (3) Houston, (T-4) New Orleans, (T-4) Dallas or (T-4) Utah.

However, much like 1994-1995, when the Houston Rockets won the NBA championship as the #6 seed in the Western Conference, after an injury-plagued regular season campaign, and 2000-2001, when the L.A. Lakers played a significant number of regular season games without Kobe Bryant, Derek Fisher & Ron Harper, before winning their final 8 in a row and then going 15-1 in the post-season … given the key injuries sustained at different times this year by (A) Tim Duncan, Tony Parker & Manu Ginobili, and (B) Andrew Bynum … it should not be a surprise to anyone if either (7) San Antonio or the (10) L.A. Lakers - both of which are ’Top 9′ teams with a healthy roster - rise to challenge and win the title this year.