Posts Tagged ‘Kendrick Perkins’

For those expecting Bargnani to be improved next season

Monday, July 26th, 2010

Approximately 13 months ago, the following question was asked in this space, in a poll:

Where will Andrea Bargnani rank in the Eastern Conference next season, as a Center? … You Make The Call

pertaining to the 2009-2010 season.

As the Raptors complete their seemingly annual summer make-over, under the watch of Bryan Colangelo/GM, in preparation for the 2010-2011 campaign, it is interesting to see how the landscape is shaping up in the Eastern Conference, when evaluating the individual players who might be expected to start at the Center position for their respective teams:

PART 1 - Based On Basketball Acumen

Ranking Expected Starting Centers

in the Eastern Conference, 2010-2011

LY

TEAM

EXPECTED

OFF

DEF

REB

TOT

Rank

1

Cleveland

Varejao/A

12

10

10

32

12

2

Orlando

Howard/D

3

1

1

5

1

3

Atlanta

Horford/A

8

7

3

18

5

4

Boston

Perkins/K

13

4

7

24

7

5

Miami

Bosh/C

1

8

4

13

2

6

Milwaukee

Bogut/A

4

9

8

21

6

7

Charlotte

Dampier/E

15

5

9

29

10

8

Chicago

Noah/J

10

2

2

14

T-3

9

Toronto

Bargnani/A

7

15

15

37

15

10

Indiana

Hibbert/R

11

11

11

33

13

11

New York

Stoudemire/A

2

14

12

28

9

12

Detroit

Wallace/B

14

6

5

25

8

13

Philadelphia

Speights/M

9

13

14

36

14

14

Washington

Blatche/A

6

12

13

31

11

15

New Jersey

Lopez/B

5

3

6

14

T-3

LEGEND: LY – Last year’s finish in the Final Standings; EXPECTED – Expected Starter in best available line-up; OFF – Offensive rating relative to peers [1.e. #1-15]; DEF – Defensive rating relative to peers [i.e. #1-15]; Rebounding rating relative to peers [i.e. #1-15]; Rank – Overall Ranking relative to peers [i.e. #1-15].

PART 2 - Painting By the Numbers [from hoopdata for the 2009-2010]

Ranking For Expected Starting Centers

in the Eastern Conference, 2010-2011

LY

TEAM

EXPECTED

MP

OFFENSE

DEFENSE

REBOUNDING

 

 

PTS

P/MP

Ork

DEF

D/MP

Drk

REB

R/MP

Rrk

TOT

Rank

1

Cleveland

Varejao/A

2164

651

0.301

13

165

0.076

7

578

0.267

7

27

11

2

Orlando

Howard/D

2844

1503

0.528

3

305

0.107

2

1081

0.380

1

6

1

3

Atlanta

Horford/A

2846

1148

0.403

10

157

0.055

14

799

0.281

8

32

14

4

Boston

Perkins/K

2153

791

0.367

11

161

0.075

8

595

0.276

9

28

T-12

5

Miami

Bosh/C

2527

1678

0.664

2

125

0.049

15

759

0.300

6

23

T-6

6

Milwaukee

Bogut/A

2231

1095

0.491

7

264

0.118

1

703

0.315

3

11

2

7

Charlotte

Dampier/E

1280

328

0.256

14

94

0.073

10

400

0.313

4

18

3

8

Chicago

Noah/J

1922

687

0.357

12

144

0.075

8

705

0.367

2

22

5

9

Toronto

Bargnani/A

2801

1376

0.491

7

152

0.054

12

494

0.176

15

34

15

10

Indiana

Hibbert/R

2036

946

0.465

9

180

0.088

4

464

0.228

13

26

T-9

11

New York

Stoudemire/A

2836

1896

0.669

1

153

0.054

12

732

0.258

10

23

T-6

12

Detroit

Wallace/B

1974

381

0.193

15

200

0.101

3

597

0.302

5

23

T-6

13

Philadelphia

Speights/M

1017

532

0.523

4

84

0.083

5

252

0.248

11

20

4

14

Washington

Blatche/A

2254

1143

0.507

6

184

0.082

6

509

0.226

14

26

T-9

15

New Jersey

Lopez/B

3025

1542

0.510

5

203

0.067

11

709

0.234

12

28

T-12

LEGEND: LY – Last year’s finish in the Final Standings; EXPECTED – Expected starter in best available line-up; MP – Total Minutes Played; PTS – Total Points Scored; P/MP – Total Points Scored per Minute Played; Ork – Offensive Ranking; DEF – Total Steals + Blocked Shots +Drawn Charges; D/MP – DEF per Minute Played; Drk – Defensive Ranking; REB – Total Rebounds; R/MP – Total Rebounds per Minute Played; Rrk – Rebounding Ranking; TOT – Ork + Drk + Rrk; Rank – Total Ranking.

From Toronto’s perspective …

The more some things change, the more other things simply stay the same.

Arnovitz breaks down the Lakers’ Game 6 defense

Wednesday, June 16th, 2010

The Lakers’ defense gets it done

The Lakers pressured the Celtics all night, making life particularly miserable for Paul Pierce. The defense was all the more stifling because Kobe Bryant continued to play rover, sloughing off Rajon Rondo in the half court to plug holes and double-team the ball. Bryant’s strategy was nothing new, but the Lakers’ quickness to the ball, readiness on ball screens and relentlessness on those traps were unprecedented. Literally. The Lakers’ defensive rating of 75.3 on Tuesday night was their best mark of the season — and far and away the Celtics’ worst offensive output since opening night.

A real key was Phil Jackson’s decision to have the Lakers “trap” more aggressively vs Boston’s “Pick and Pop” offensive action, in conjunction with allowing Kobe Bryant to rotate out, at least initially, to the temporarily “open” shooter … whoever he might be … while consistently “helping off” of Rajon Rondo.

When this version of the LA Lakers plays with this sort of well-coordinated Offense, Defense and Rebounding they are simply the best team in the NBA.

How the Lakers mauled the Celtics in Game 6

Wednesday, June 16th, 2010

Dominating an opponent on the glass is a fundamental component of being a championship calibre basketball team … at any level of the game.

What it takes to win the NBA Championship

However …

What the ability to rebound the ball successfully actually says about the nature of a specific team’s essential character is a great deal more nuanced than just this single aspect of the game.

In fact, in order for Team A to dominate Team B, in terms of Rebounding prowess, what it means is that Team A must also be able to:

First.
Get “Possession Stops” at the defensive end of the floor, by:

i. Limiting Team B’s opportunities to score easy points in offensive transition situations;

ii. Limiting Team B’s opportunities to penetrate the perimeter wall of its half-court defense to create high percentage interior FGA’s;

and,

iii. Limiting Team B’s opportunities to get uncontested mid-range and perimeter jump shots;

Second.
Secure the defensive rebound when a shot is missed, by physically out-working its opponent;

Third.
Limit its own number of Turnovers [on offense] … in order to limit Team B’s opportunities to score easy points in offensive transition situations;

Fourth.
Generate high percentage FGA’s [on offense] from sound, unselfish ball and player movement;

and,

Fifth.
Secure a number of offensive rebounds when shots are missed, by physically out-working its opponent, while maintaining:

i. Good defensive floor balance … in order to limit Team B’s opportunities to score easy points in offensive transition situations;

ii. Outstanding mental concentration;

and,

iii. Sound emotional stability.

When a team is actually capable of doing each of these things it means that its individual components are working in concert with one another, in a superior form of “collective effort/will/ability,” relative to its opponent.

The Lakers punched the bully in the mouth

As Pat Riley aptly said during the glory years of the original “ShowTime” Lakers,

NO rebounds; NO rings.

———————————–

PS. The unfortunate injury which Kendrick Perkins [C] sustained at the mid-way point of the 1st quarter in last night’s game will, in all likelihood, end up costing Boston this series, as the Celtics … who are also playing with a less-than 100% healthy Kevin Garnett [PF/C] … are simply incapable of out-rebounding the Lakers without him in their line-up.

What you should expect from this year’s NBA Finals

Thursday, June 3rd, 2010

The NBA Finals [v.2009-2010] tip off this evening in Los Angeles.

                       

LEGITIMATE CONTENDERS IN THE NBA PLAYOFFS

[as of Thursday April 15, 2010]

 

TEAM

W

L

W%

EAST

WEST

PDR

PAR

RDR

QR

QIR

Celtics

50

32

.610

4

 

9

5

25

39

12

Lakers

57

25

.695

 

1

6

9

7

22

6

LEGEND: W – Wins; L – Losses; Win% - Winning Percentage; PDR – Points Differential Ranking; PAR – Points Allowed Ranking; RDR – Rebounding Differential Ranking; QR – Quality Rating [i.e. PDR + PAR + RDR = QR]; QIR – Quality Index Ranking [i.e. QR/#1-16].

While Rounds 1, 2 and 3 have produced some fair-to-good basketball, this version of the Finals should prove to be an entirely different kettle of fish.

 

NBA PLAYOFFS
4th Round [FINALS] MATCH-UP

 

Celtics

50

32

.610

4

 

9

5

25

39

12

Lakers

57

25

.695

 

1

6

9

7

22

6

STARTERS

Rajon Rondo

Ray Allen

Paul Pierce

Kevin Garnett

Kendrick Perkins

ß

à

=

=

=

Derek Fisher

Kobe Bryant

Ron Artest

Pau Gasol

Andrew Bynum

+1

Sub-Total

+1

KEY SUBS

Tony Allen

Glen Davis

Rasheed Wallace

=

=

à

Shannon Brown

Josh Powell

Lamar Odom

0

Sub-Total

+1

OTHERS

Nate Robinson

Michael Finley

Marquis Daniels

Shelden Williams

=

=

=

=

Jordan Farmar

Sasha Vujacic

Luke Walton

DJ Mbenga

COACHING

Doc Rivers

à

Phil Jackson

0

Sub-Total

0

+1

TOTAL

+2

Analysis: If Kevin Garnett was 100% healthy and fully recovered from his knee injury of last season, then, the Celtics might actually be the correct pick in this match-up. Although he seems to be regaining some of his former vertical explosiveness and a good deal of his horizontal speed, his lateral quickness and agility are still not back to what they were 2 seasons ago, when he was one of the best defensive players in the history of the NBA.

 

Conversely, when the Lakers are relatively healthy – which they haven’t been for much of this season - they are simply the best team in the NBA this year. Although the Celtics’ Starting 5 is formidable, the Lakers should be able to withstand the initial on-slaught … if they use their bench players properly … and, then, gradually wear Boston down over the course of a physically grueling series.

 

Shortening Boston’s rotation should not produce an advantage for the Celtics against this opponent.

 

Pick: LOS ANGELES has the home court advantage this time and should win in 6 [or, perhaps, 7] games.

 

[Caveat: If Phil Jackson should happen to get out-coached – e.g. refusing to use Josh Powell vs Glen Davis – by Doc Rivers, then, the Celtics could well capitalize and win this series.] 

These 2 teams are quite evenly matched.

The Lakers, however, signed Ron Artest last summer for one reason only.

i.e. To have him defend either LeBron James or Paul Pierce in the NBA Finals. 

If Ron Ron does his job properly, from a physical standpoint, and can play Da Truth to a virtual stand-off, then … all else being equal … the Lakers will be hoisting another championship banner to the rafters when the 2010-2011 kicks off in the fall.

It really is as simple as that.

Enjoy what should be a real hum-dinger of a series!

Have the T-wolves found their long term Center?

Wednesday, March 24th, 2010

While it might be true that Darko Milicic is properly described as being a great many different things … including, possibly, the biggest bust in the last 10 years of the NBA Draft … it should also be duly noted that he is clearly not one of these, as well:

————

For lack of a few crucial stops, Wolves lose 13th straight

Though the Wolves have won only one game since the 7-foot Serbian arrived in mid-February, Rambis said he has seen flashes of a player so promising seven years ago, when he was drafted ahead of [Chris] Bosh, Carmelo Anthony and Dwyane Wade.

“And I think he can be a lot better,” Rambis said. “As he gets in better shape and gets more comfortable and more confident, you’ll see him stretch his game.”

In fact, he’s already done that offensively. Milicic scored a season-high 16 points against the Lakers last Friday, and appeared to be more confident about taking good shots.

“The guys are learning how to use him,” Rambis said. “I’ve told him, whenever he’s comfortable, I’m OK with him shooting inside, outside, [from the] elbow, long distance. But he has to have the confidence to do that.”

For Milicic, who is still only 24 years old despite being a seven-year NBA veteran, it’s a matter of playing the way he was taught back in Serbia.

“I’m just trying to relax. I got used to playing this American way of running crazy, playing too fast. I’ve got to slow it down,” Milicic said. “When I came [to the U.S.], I stopped playing basketball the way I know how to play. Playing too fast, running like chickens without heads.”

———-

If he can successfully return to the roots of his “multi-headed” individual game … by learning how to slow down and play within the confines of the Triangle Offense, let’s say, with Ricky Rubio/PG, at the helm, beside Al Jefferson/PF, Kevin Love/PF, Corey Brewer/OG-SF and the T-wolves upcoming 2010 Lottery Selection …

Is there really any good reason to believe that Darko Milicic, at the still relatively tender age of 24, 

is somehow incapable of putting up “15 and 8″, on a game-to-game basis …

against the other “25 and under” starting calibre Centers, in the NBA today

EASTERN CONFERENCE

WESTERN CONFERENCE

ATLANTIC

NORTHWEST

Boston

Perkins, K [25]

Denver

Petro, J [24]

Toronto

Bargnani, A [24]

Utah

Fesenko, K [23]

New York

Oklahoma City

Ibaka, S [20]

Philadelphia

Speights, M [22]

Portland

Oden, G [21]

New Jersey

Lopez, B [21]

Minnesota

Milicic, D [24]

CENTRAL

PACIFIC

Cleveland

LA Lakers

Bynum, A [22]

Milwaukee

Bogut, A [25]

Phoenix

Lopez, R [21]

Chicago

Noah, J [25]

LA Clippers

Jordan, D [21]

Indiana

Hibbert, R [23]

Sacramento

Hawes, S [21]

Detroit

Golden State

Biedrins, A [23]

SOUTHEAST

SOUTHWEST

Orlando

Howard, D [24]

Dallas

Atlanta

Horford, A [24]

San Antonio

Miami

Memphis

Gasol, M [25]

Charlotte

Houston

Washington

Blatche, A [25]

New Orleans

… over the course of the next several seasons?

—————————–

In what group would you place Darko Milicic amongst the other "25 and under" starting calibre Centers in the NBA today?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

RESPECT the Champ’s right to fight on

Tuesday, February 9th, 2010

Craig Kwasniewski [The Association], a die-hard LA Lakers fan and season-ticket holder, smacks one a clear country mile, when reviewing the precise reasons why the Boston Celtics SHOULD simply “stay the course” with their latter-day version of the Big Three:

Celtics Should Keep Ray Allen for One Last Ride with The Big Three

I think it’s insane to break up The Big Three so soon after hanging banner 17.  Shouldn’t they be allowed to give it one last shot together?  Shouldn’t we consider that this might be a rough patch in a long season?  Why break up a good thing so quickly, did you not forget the 22-year championship drought?

Anyway, here are a few reasons why the C’s should keep Ray Allen and give The Big Three one last chance at a title:

The long regular season. Relax Boston… I know it’s cold and miserable back east and the long winter is getting to you but you really need to be reminded how The Association works.  The NBA regular season is a very long 82-games over six months. Mix in preseason and hopefully a long postseason and you’re looking at a 8 or 9 month season. Veteran teams always seem to hit a lull somewhere between Christmas and Easter. It’s impossible to bring playoff efforts when your key players are in their 30’s… it’s just not possible (and the ones that did, like the Pat Riley Heat teams in the late 90’s collapsed in a heap by playoff time).  Just ride out this rough patch, usually teams find their second wind around March Madness.

Don’t be so quick to blow up the Big Three.  Counting playoffs The Big Three era has lasted about 2 1/2 seasons for a total of 253 games.  Actually that sounds like a good number of games… a good run at legitimate title contention, right?  Not really when you consider that the C’s were last legit contenders when Bird retired in 1992.  That’s 15 seasons with 6 brief postseason appearances (and only one conference championship appearance in 2001-02 with the Jim O’Brien chuck-and-duck era) for a grand total of 1,275 games.  Suddenly 253 games doesn’t sound like a lot does it?  Maybe you might want to remember the long drought before sending off a future hall-of-fame guard for a quick fix.

At the bottom of my gut, with every inch of me, I plain, straight hate you. But dammit, do I respect you!  Appreciate what you have Celtics fans.  I’ll be honest here, I hate the Boston Celtics.  Of course I do, I’m a 11-year Lakers season ticket holder.  One of my worst sporting experiences ever was Game 5 from the 2008 NBA Finals.  It still scars me to this day and anytime I see a 2008 NBA Champions tee, I make a concerted effort to throw a “hey FU man!” look at whomever is wearing it. But you know what?  The NBA and especially Lakers fans need the Boston Celtics to be relevant.  We need to have one of the fiercest rivals to be also championship rivals.  The NBA was built on it and it still exists because of it.  As much as I hate this, I want to be able to appreciate the Big Three for what they have been for the last 2 1/2 seasons and I want to be able to appreciate them for as long as I can.  Why be so quick to blow up this squad?  Yeah I know the potential is there to acquire some key talent, but the Celtics ain’t getting more than a Kurt Hinrich and a bag of contracts for Allen… nothing more.  That might be appealing right at this moment, especially with Allen playing like garbage, but in the long run Hinrich’s offensive game doesn’t even sniff Allen’s jock.

That’s the thing here… even near the end of his career Ray Allen is still more talented that what the C’s will likely get in return.  He still gets the respect calls from the refs and he still has that killer mid-range jumper that will stretch out the defense and create lanes for Pierce and Rondo to drive through.  Plus Allen still is the C’s second-best player in the clutch.  Need I remind you what he did in the Bulls series last year?  Stats, especially “clutch stats” may count shooting percentages late in the game but they don’t keep count of the willingness to take they key shots with the game on the line.  And Ray Allen is fearless with the ball in his hands, the clock winding down and a chance to tie or win.  Despite having an off year he’s still very capable of bouncing back and rallying for one last shot at a title.

———————————

In the judgment of yours truly, Craig’s take is 100% on the money.

Although Ubuntu! may not have enough left in the tank this season to be able to actually win-it-all, again … with the Lakers, Magic and Cavaliers being as strong as they are right now … it sure as heck DESERVES THE OPPORTUNITY TO TRY, at least, ONE MORE TIME, even bloodied and battered.

Simple put … that’s THE RIGHT STUFF of which True Champions are made, whether or not they, in fact, succeed on the court together.

Raptors punked by Celtics, according to Wright

Saturday, November 28th, 2009

Toronto Raptors 103
BOSTON CELTICS 116
Fri Nov 27 2009 - Game Summary

 

Feschuk: Raptors bow down meekly to Celtics 103-116
[excerpt #1]
“There’s no other way to say it – we just got punked,” said Antoine Wright, Toronto’s veteran swingman, a rare voice of outrage on a ho-hum club.

“We’ve got guys standing over our best player, flexing, and it’s not something we can stand for. I was pretty frustrated sitting on the bench watching their whole team run out there on the floor and we only had our coaches up shouting and screaming at their players. I don’t like that.”

Said Bosh: “Yeah, I’d like to see the team more passionate. I look at their bench and they’re all up standing at half-court, and nobody from their team was down on the floor. I think we would react better to just be out there for one another and just stay together.”

Wright and Bosh were on something of an island, it seemed. Jay Triano, the Toronto coach, didn’t register a qualm with his team’s reaction to Pierce’s technical; he said he “liked the way we fought back after that” – although the Raptors, down 17 points at the time, never got the Boston advantage below nine points. Jarrett Jack, who bent down to check on Bosh, pointed out that the play was clean, and that the Raptors had come to Bosh’s aid when Bosh tangled with Dwight Howard in a game against the Magic earlier this season.

Nobody was suggesting the Raptors should have brawled. But there’s no denying that Pierce’s dunk-and-pose was symbolic of Boston’s second-half manhandling of the soft visitors.

———————————–

When you look at the Full Play-By-Play of the 3rd Quarter … from the 8:00 mark until the end of the stanza … you should be able to see that Antoine Wright was on the court when this game changed for the worst, from the Raptors’ perspective, and did nothing to stem the tide with his own play.

———————————– 

Q1. How does a team which is soft Defensively, and in terms of Rebounding, increase its overall Toughness Quotient?

A1. Not by adding 9 new players to its roster that play the game like this:

NEW PLAYER ADDED

NBA QUALITY/ROLE

STRENGTH

WEAKNESS

1 Reggie Evans, PF

Back-up

Toughness

Skill

2 Hedo Turkoglu, SF

Starter

Skill

Toughness?

3 DeMar DeRozan, OG

Back-up

Skill

Toughness?

4 Jarrett Jack, PG

Back-up

Skill

Toughness?

5 Antoine Wright, SF

Back-up

?

Toughness?

6 Marco Belinelli, OG

Back-up

Skill

Toughness?

7 Amir Johnson, PF

Back-up

Energy

Toughness?

8 Sonny Weems, SF

Back-up

?

Toughness?

9 Rasho Nesterovic, C

Back-up

Skill

Toughness?

10 Pops M-Bonsu, PF

Back-up

Energy

Skill

with an existing group that looks like this:

 HOLD-OVER PLAYER

NBA QUALITY/ROLE

STRENGTH

WEAKNESS

1 Chris Bosh, PF

Starter

Character

Skill

2 Jose Calderon, PG

Starter

Skill

Toughness?

3 Andrea Bargnani, C

Starter

Skill

Toughness?

4 Patrick O’Bryant, C

Back-up

?

Toughness?

5 Marcus Banks, PG

Back-up

?

Skill

 

High end teams in the NBA have a player roster which is filled with QUALITY DEPTH and several individuals that come ready-made with PHYSICAL TOUGHNESS.

In the immediate aftermath of Paul Pierce’s drive and dunk, in which he planted his knee directly into Chris Bosh’s groin area … it’s NO COINCIDENCE that the first two members of the Raptors’ contingent to forcibly express their displeasure were:

#1. Alex English [former NBA player, Hall of Fame Inductee]; and,

#2. Marc Iavaroni [former NBA player, 1981 World Champion, Philadelphia 76ers].

———————————–

[excerpt #2]
Wright, speaking to reporters before the game, criticized unnamed teammates for lax preparation in the wake of Wednesday’s 35-point loss in Charlotte: “You’ve got guys in here eating popcorn, joking around before the game. And we go out there and lose by 40. It’s a direct result of what’s going on before the game. Guys not coming in with the right mind frame.”

Those words appeared to resonate. Said Sonny Weems, the 23-year-old wing: “We do fool around a lot. And it tends to carry over into the game, and that’s something that needs to change.”

You’ll excuse Bosh, the seventh-year Raptor who has heard similar vows of vigilance before, if he exhaled through the post-game questions.

Said Wright: “We’ve got a lot of good players on this team but we’re going to have to come together or teams are just going to continue to run us over like this.”

Sighed Bosh: “I’m tired of talking about toughness. We talk about it too much. We talk about everything too much. We’ve got to stop talking about it and just do it.”

———————————–

Until the current Raptors’ Management Team understands the TRUE VALUE of Defense, Rebounding and PHYSICAL TOUGHNESS … for the High End teams in the NBA … Toronto will continue to be an also-ran.

Memo to Bryan Colangelo.

The time for Tough[ness] Talk has long since passed … if you want to re-sign Chris Bosh this summer and construct a championship calibre organization for the Toronto Raptors.

The ball is in YOUR court, once again.

When number-crunching and acumen point in the same direction

Friday, October 23rd, 2009

For the benefit of those who may not have read it yet …

Can Toronto Build a Winner Around Bosh
When we put the entire picture together, it doesn’t look too good for fans of Toronto.  The Raptors will still employ the services of Calderon and Bosh, and these players produced about 21 wins last year.  And it’s possible that Turkoglu, Jack, Evans, and Johnson can contribute another 15 wins.  After these players, though, who else is going to produce significant quantity of wins?  And if no one else produces much, how will Bosh believe that the Raptors are building a contender?

———————————

is a first-rate take by David Berri on the Raptors’ current situation.

Since his arrival in the NBA, 6 seasons ago, Chris Bosh has firmly established himself as one of the very best Big Men in the League … with an individual game that’s unique, as an under-sized Center, and in need of support from a group of talented teammates. Unfortunately, what has also happened during this same time-frame, repeatedly, is that the team’s ownership group [i.e. MLSE] and upper management have demonstrated an inability to make sound basketball-related decisions around him, based on an over-riding Plan of Attack geared toward the building of a championship-winning calibre team in Toronto, through the proper acquisition and retention of Top Notch NBA talent, which includes executives, coaches, support staff and players.

Understanding exactly what the Boston Celtics actually did 3 summers ago to transform their team into a legitimate title contender:

———-

1. Retain the services of a very good and already-proven NBA head coach;
2. Hold onto their already-established franchise player [i.e. Paul Pierce];
3. Trade an upcoming top draft pick for a 2nd established franchise player [i.e. Ray Allen];
4. Include their younger burgeoning talent [i.e. i. Al Jefferson, ii. Ryan Gomes, and iii. Sebastien Telfair] in a major trade for a 3rd “stud” player [i.e. The Big Ticket];
5. Keep a bedrock player like Kendrick Perkins [C], as a building block for their future team;
6. Draft another young stud at the PG position [i.e. Rajon Rondo], who other teams over-looked/under-valued; and, then,
7. Filled out the remainder of its roster with very serviceable players with great attitudes who were committed to winning a championship above all else.

———-

means that all is NOT lost for the Raptors, as long as they begin to identify accurately what their actual strengths and weaknesses are, relative to their competition.

What “regular Raptors fans” need to do is spend some more time figuring out who on their team fits properly into the corresponding roles of Wyc Grousbeck [i.e. MLSE?], Danny Ainge [i.e. Bryan Colangelo?], Doc Rivers [i.e. Jay Triano?], Paul Pierce [i.e. Chris Bosh!] and Ray Allen [?], Kevin Garnett [?], and Al Jefferson [i.e. Andrea Bargnani!!!], etc., and less time putting down the 5th best player in the brief history of the team [i.e. CB4] and his designated running mate [i.e. El Matador].

———————————

PS. Those who think that Danny Ainge [GM] was operating without an over-riding Plan of Attack, based on his Basketball Acumen, simply do not know how the NBA actually works, or how a team needs to go about building a championship-winning organization, at the highest level of competition.

Exhibition Game 5, Raptors vs Celtics: What you need to know

Thursday, October 15th, 2009

The pertinent facts from this game?

1. The Raptors used their main rotation players for more minutes than the Celtics [Box Score].

2. The 3rd Quarter Play-By-Play.

Start of 3rd Quarter
  11:42
[BOS 53-46]
Allen Pullup Jump shot: Made (6 PTS) 
  11:27 Pierce Foul : Personal (1 PF) 
Calderon Jump Shot: Made (7 PTS)  11:15
[TOR 48-53]
 
  10:53 Allen 3pt Shot: Missed 
Bargnani Rebound (Off:3 Def:3)  10:52  
Turkoglu Driving Reverse Layup Shot: Made (2 PTS) Assist: Calderon (2 AST)  10:40
[TOR 50-53]
 
  10:20
[BOS 55-50]
Perkins Jump Hook Shot: Made (6 PTS) Assist: Garnett (2 AST) 
  10:03 Allen Foul : Shooting (2 PF) 
DeRozan Free Throw 1 of 2 (6 PTS)  10:03
[TOR 51-55]
 
DeRozan Free Throw 2 of 2 (5 PTS)  10:03
[TOR 51-55]
 
  09:53
[BOS 57-52]
Rondo Driving Finger Roll Layup Shot: Made (4 PTS) 
DeRozan Jump Shot: Missed  09:34  
  09:33 Perkins Rebound (Off:3 Def:3) 
  09:27
[BOS 60-52]
Pierce 3pt Shot: Made (15 PTS) Assist: Rondo (5 AST) 
Calderon 3pt Shot: Made (10 PTS) Assist: Bosh (3 AST)  09:02
[TOR 55-60]
 
  08:44
[BOS 62-55]
Garnett Alley Oop Layup shot: Made (10 PTS) Assist: Perkins (1 AST) 
Turkoglu Fade Away Jumper Shot: Made (4 PTS)  08:20
[TOR 57-62]
 
  07:57
[BOS 64-57]
Perkins Layup Shot: Made (8 PTS) Assist: Rondo (6 AST) 
Bosh Layup Shot: Missed Block: Garnett (2 BLK)  07:37  
  07:35 Pierce Rebound (Off:0 Def:1) 
  07:32
[BOS 66-57]
Garnett Alley Oop Layup shot: Made (12 PTS) Assist: Rondo (7 AST) 
Bargnani 3pt Shot: Made (5 PTS) Assist: Calderon (3 AST)  07:08
[TOR 60-66]
 
Bargnani Foul : Shooting (3 PF)  06:53  
  06:53
[BOS 67-60]
Perkins Free Throw 1 of 2 (9 PTS) 
  06:53
[BOS 68-60]
Perkins Free Throw 2 of 2 (10 PTS) 
Turkoglu Fade Away Jumper Shot: Made (6 PTS)  06:38
[TOR 62-68]
 
  06:30
[BOS 70-62]
Garnett Alley Oop Dunk Shot: Made (14 PTS) Assist: Rondo (8 AST) 
Bosh Layup Shot: Missed  06:09  
  06:08 Garnett Rebound (Off:1 Def:5) 
Calderon Foul : Personal (2 PF)  06:07  
  06:07 Team Timeout : Regular 
  05:55
[BOS 72-62]
Garnett Jump Shot: Made (16 PTS) Assist: Allen (4 AST) 
Bargnani 3pt Shot: Missed  05:39  
  05:39 Pierce Rebound (Off:0 Def:2) 
  05:28 Rondo Turnover : Lost Ball (2 TO) Steal:Calderon (3 ST) 
Calderon Running Layup Shot: Made (12 PTS)  05:24
[TOR 64-72]
 
  05:08 Pierce 3pt Shot: Missed 
Bosh Rebound (Off:1 Def:2)  05:07  
Calderon Turnover : Bad Pass (1 TO) Steal:Pierce (1 ST)  05:02  
Calderon Foul : Shooting (3 PF)  04:57  
  04:57
[BOS 73-64]
Allen Free Throw 1 of 2 (7 PTS) 
Turkoglu Substitution replaced by Weems  04:57  
  04:57 Garnett Substitution replaced by Davis 
  04:57
[BOS 74-64]
Allen Free Throw 2 of 2 (8 PTS) 
DeRozan Jump Shot: Missed  04:43  
  04:41 Allen Rebound (Off:0 Def:5) 
  04:30 Pierce 3pt Shot: Missed 
  04:29 Perkins Rebound (Off:4 Def:3) 
Bosh Foul : Shooting (3 PF)  04:28  
  04:28 Perkins Free Throw 1 of 2 Missed 
  04:28 Team Rebound 
DeRozan Substitution replaced by Belinelli  04:28  
  04:28
[BOS 75-64]
Perkins Free Throw 2 of 2 (11 PTS) 
Bosh Turnover : Out of Bounds Lost Ball Turnover (1 TO)  04:15  
  04:05
[BOS 77-64]
Rondo Pullup Jump shot: Made (6 PTS) 
  03:50 Perkins Foul : Personal (4 PF) 
Bosh Free Throw 1 of 2 Missed  03:50  
Team Rebound  03:50  
Bosh Free Throw 2 of 2 (21 PTS)  03:50
[TOR 65-77]
 
  03:35 Pierce Turnover : Bad Pass (2 TO) Steal:Belinelli (1 ST) 
Bargnani Layup Shot: Missed  03:25  
  03:24 Davis Rebound (Off:2 Def:1) 
Bosh Foul : Personal (4 PF)  03:22  
  03:22
[BOS 78-65]
Davis Free Throw 1 of 2 (11 PTS) 
  03:22 Rondo Substitution replaced by House 
  03:22 Davis Free Throw 2 of 2 Missed 
Bosh Rebound (Off:1 Def:3)  03:22  
Bosh Foul : Offensive (5 PF)  03:12  
Bosh Turnover : Foul (2 TO)  03:12  
Weems Foul : Personal (1 PF)  02:59  
Team Timeout : Regular  02:59  
Bosh Substitution replaced by Jack  02:59  
Calderon Substitution replaced by Johnson  02:59  
  02:59 Pierce Free Throw 1 of 2 Missed 
  02:59 Team Rebound 
  02:59 Pierce Free Throw 2 of 2 Missed 
  02:57 Pierce Rebound (Off:1 Def:2) 
  02:56
[BOS 80-65]
Pierce Driving Layup Shot: Made (17 PTS) 
Bargnani Running Jump Shot: Missed  02:38  
  02:37 Allen Rebound (Off:0 Def:6) 
  02:19 Perkins Jump Shot: Missed Block: Johnson (1 BLK) 
Jack Rebound (Off:0 Def:3)  02:17  
Belinelli Layup Shot: Made (2 PTS) Assist: Jack (4 AST)  02:14
[TOR 67-80]
 
  01:50
[BOS 83-67]
House 3pt Shot: Made (8 PTS) Assist: Pierce (2 AST) 
  01:30 Davis Foul : Shooting (1 PF) 
  01:30 Pierce Substitution replaced by Daniels 
  01:30 Allen Substitution replaced by Hudson 
Bargnani Free Throw 1 of 2 Missed  01:30  
Team Rebound  01:30  
Bargnani Free Throw 2 of 2 (6 PTS)  01:30
[TOR 68-83]
 
  01:17 Daniels Layup Shot: Missed Block: Bargnani (1 BLK) 
  01:16 Team Rebound 
  01:09 House 3pt Shot: Missed 
Team Rebound  01:07  
  01:07 Perkins Substitution replaced by Williams 
Weems Turnover : Bad Pass (2 TO) Steal:Hudson (1 ST)  00:50.9  
  00:41.9 Williams Hook Shot: Missed Block: Johnson (2 BLK) 
Bargnani Rebound (Off:3 Def:4)  00:40.9  
Jack Driving Layup Shot: Made (9 PTS)  00:35.2
[TOR 70-83]
 
  00:23.1 Davis Foul : Offensive (2 PF) 
  00:23.1 Davis Turnover : Foul (1 TO) 
  00:02.0 Williams Foul : Shooting (1 PF) 
Jack Free Throw 1 of 2 Missed  00:02.0  
Team Rebound  00:02.0  
Jack Free Throw 2 of 2 (10 PTS)  00:02.0
[TOR 71-83]
 
  00:00.0 House 3pt Shot: Missed 
  00:00.0 Team Rebound 
End of 3rd Quarter

3. Given the state of his physical condition at this stage of his recovery from off-season surgery on his right knee, expect to see Kevin Garnett check Andrea Bargnani this season … with Kendrick Perkins checking CB4 … when these teams face one another.

4. KPM’s for this game:

KHANDOR’S PLUS/MINUS

AND MINUTES PLAYED

[Tor vs BOS, Oct 14 2009]

RAPTORS

KPM

MP

CELTICS

KPM

MP

1

Bosh

+15

28

1

Garnett

+19

23

2

Calderon

+12

24

2

Rondo

+15

22

3

Jack

+11

22

3

Pierce

+15

26

4

Johnson

+6

15

4

Hudson

+13

14

5

Turkoglu

+6

22

5

Perkins

+13

25

6

Nesterovic

+5

15

6

Davis

+12

20

7

Weems

+5

27

7

Allen,R

+9

26

8

Bargnani

+5

28

8

House

+8

21

9

DeRozan

+4

26

9

Sweetney

+4

11

10

Douby

+2

5

10

Giddens

+3

13

11

Belinelli

+2

15

11

Williams

+1

16

12

O’Bryant

+1

5

12

Scalabrine

-2

7

13

Banks

-1

5

13

Daniels

-3

17

14

Evans

-2

5

Out

Allen,T

 

 

Out

Wright

 

 

Out

Walker

 

 

 

 

 

 

Out

Wallace

 

 

 

TOTAL

+81

 

 

TOTAL

+107

 


LEGEND
:
KPM – khandor’s Plus/Minus = [Rebs + Ast + St + Bs + Pts] – [Missed FGA + Missed FTA + PF + TO]; MP – Minutes Played.

5. When they kick it into gear, the Celtics’ Rebounding [44-32] and Defensive/Offensive Efficiency [BOS: 0.99, 106 pts on 107 possessions; 0.99/Tor: 0.91, 90 pts on 99 possessions] numbers are superior to the Raptors. 

Toronto Raptors Season Preview: Game 17

Wednesday, October 14th, 2009

re: How an astute NBA observer might expect the first part of the schedule to unfold for the Raptors this year

Game 17 – at Boston [Fri Nov 27]

 

RAPTORS

ADV

CELTICS

PG

Calderon

à

PG

Rondo

OG

DeRozan *

à

OG

Allen-R

SF

Turkoglu $^

à

SF

Pierce

PF

Bosh

=

PF

Garnett

C

Bargnani

=

C

Perkins

 

 

 

PG

Jack #

=

PG

House

OG

Belinelli ^

=

G

Allen-T

SF

Wright ^

=

SF

Daniels #

PF

Evans ^

=

PF

Davis $R

C

Nesterovic $

à

C

Wallace $

 

 

 

G/F

Douby

=

SF

Hudson *

PF

Johnson ^

ß

PF

Scalabrine

 

 

 

HC

Triano

à

HC

Rivers

 

 

 

+1

OUTCOME

+5

Legend: ADV – Individual match-up advantage; * - 2009 NBA Draftee; ^ - Acquired via trade; # - Restricted free agent; #M – Restricted free agent, matched offer; $ - Unrestricted free agent; $R – Unrestricted free agent, re-signed; $^ - Acquired via Sign & Trade; Italics – Returning player; ? – Injured, status uncertain.

When healthy, this group of Celtics is too much for the Raptors to handle, with the only match-up advantage, in Toronto’s favour, deep on the bench.

Since the baseline 2005-2006 season …

Season

Boston Celtics

Toronto Raptors

2008-2009

62-20/.756, 1st

=

33-49/.402, 4th

2007-2008

66-16/.805, 1st  

↑↑

41-41/.500, 2nd

2006-2007

24-58/.293, 5th

47-35/.573, 1st

2005-2006

33-49/.402, 3rd

 

27-55/.329, 4th

 

these two teams have, in fact, gone in opposite directions in the Atlantic Division, with the Celtics re-asserting themselves as the dominant organization in the EC, on the whole, and the Raptors sinking back towards the bottom of the standings.

In sharp contrast to a large percentage of other Raptors fans, unfortunately, yours truly does not see this situation changing in the immediate future, given the different ways in which these two organizations operate.

Raptors expected W-L Record: L, 6-11