Posts Tagged ‘Houston Rockets’

Legitimate Contenders to Win the 2012 NBA Championship: Part II

Friday, February 24th, 2012

Where does your favourite team rank at the halfway point in the regular season schedule?

Legitimate Contenders to Win the 2012 NBA Championship

[as of Thu-Feb-23-2012]

Team PDR PAR RDR QR QIR WCR ECR
Bulls 1 2 1 4 1 1
Heat 2 14 4 20 T-2 2
Lakers 12 6 2 20 T-2 1
Pacers 8 9 8 25 4 3
76ers 3 1 22 26 5 4
Clippers 9 15 3 27 T-6 2
Magic 10 4 13 27 T-6 5
Thunder 3 20 6 29 T-8 3
Mavericks 7 4 18 29 T-8 4
Blazers 5 10 17 32 10 5
Grizzlies 15 8 10 33 11 6
Timberwolves 15 16 4 35 12 7
Hawks 13 7 21 41 T-13 6
Rockets 14 18 9 41 T-13 8
Spurs 6 16 20 42 15 9
Hornets 24 11 11 46 16 10
Celtics 18 3 26 47 17 7
Knicks 17 12 19 48 18 8
Nuggets 11 29 12 52 19 11
Cavaliers 23 23 7 53 T-20 9
Raptors 25 13 15 53 T-20 10
Jazz 19 24 13 56 22 12
Pistons 26 18 16 60 23 11
Bucks 21 21 27 69 T-24 12
Suns 22 22 25 69 T-24 13
Warriors 19 26 29 73 26 14
Nets 27 25 24 76 27 13
Kings 28 30 22 80 28 15
Wizards 29 27 27 83 29 14
Bobcats 30 27 30 87 30 15
LEGEND: PDR – Points Differential Rankng; PAR – Points Allowed Ranking; RDR – Rebounding Differential Ranking; QR – Quality Rating [i.e. PDR + PAR + RDR = QR; QIR – Quality Index Rating [i.e. QR ranking from 1-30]; WC – Western Conference Ranking; Eastern Conference Ranking.

Related:

What it takes to win the NBA Championship

ROI: Kermit Washington recounts, in detail, first trip to Africa

Tuesday, August 23rd, 2011

When the ball actually stops bouncing long enough, in the NBA …

———————————————

Ex-Blazer Washington recounts his first aide trip to Congo

In the summer of 1994, I was working with Pete Newell at his Big Man Camp. At the time, his camp was probably the No. 1 camp in the world. Pete was a world-renowned coach and former general manager of the Lakers. He was the gentleman who drafted me to the Lakers out of college [No. 5 overall in 1973 Draft], and was responsible for me earning a spot as a starter in the NBA. I was working on the camp when the situation in Rwanda broke out.

The news was flooded with horrendous accounts of murder and terror, affecting hundreds of thousands of lives. My daughter, Dana, came into the room after watching the news on TV and was incredibly upset. Here was a young girl who was so sensitive and caring that if she saw a dog or cat hit by a car, she would always make me stop and pull it out of the street. She was compassionate for everyone and everything. She told me I better do something about this situation. I saw the broadcasts and it reminded me of the problems in Somalia years before when people were suffering and dying from the drought. I felt as though I should have helped those people and didn’t, and even years later still had residual guilt. I felt like this was my opportunity to change that feeling, so I looked in the phone book for an organization where I could donate money.

I called Doctors Without Borders and the Red Cross. I didn’t have any success speaking to a person, just to an automated teller telling me how to donate money. When I called the Northwest Medical team in Beaverton, Ore., my luck changed. They were operating 10 minutes from where I was living, and got a person on the line that was able to talk to me and give me information. They also knew who I was and were very thankful that I called so I decided to donate to them. I don’t remember how much I donated on my credit card, but I did happen to say to them before I hung up that one day I would like to go and see for myself what the conditions were really like. They said, you can go with us next week, we’re taking a group over.

———————————————

There are some truly noteworthy things accomplished in this world.

The Kermit Washington Story – i.e. Parts 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 – is most definitely one of them.

Yao Ming or Andrew Bynum, re-visited …

Wednesday, July 20th, 2011

In conjunction with:

A) Today’s official announcement made by the Rockets’ “Gentle Giant“:

Yao Ming officially retires from the NBA

and,

B) Yesterday’s unofficial internet roasting of the Lakers’ “Baby Huey“:

Andrew Bynum parked in a handicapped spot. Come on, Andrew Bynum.

it is very interesting to take a brief journey back in time … to approximately 3 years ago … when the first of three separate blog entries about Yao Ming and Andrew Bynum appeared in this space:

Yao Ming or Andrew Bynum … You make the call [Wednesday, July 30, 2008]

which was then followed by blog entry #2:

Yao Ming or Andrew Bynum … Part II (the call) [Thursday, August 7, 2008]

and, eventually, by blog entry #3:

Yao Ming or Andrew Bynum … Part III [The Playoff Series] [Monday, May 4, 2009]

which appeared during the next season’s playoffs, as the Rockets faced off against the Lakers.

In summary:

1. There should now be no doubt, whatsoever, that the great Yao Ming is deserving of an honoured place in the Naismith Basketball  Hall Of Fame, one day in the future, as an outstanding player with a terrific skill-set who [i] conducted himself with poise, dignity and class, at all times, and [ii] was a fantastic ambassador of the game;

and,

2. Andrew Bynum was, indeed, The Correct Choice in the poll conducted here 3 years ago. :-)

Legitimate Contenders In The NBA, 2010-2011: Part 1

Saturday, January 1st, 2011

At this point of the NBA regular season schedule, each team has played at least 30 games.

 

LEGITIMATE CONTENDERS TO WIN THE NBA CHAMPIONSHIP


[as of Friday, December 31, 2010]

 

TEAM

W

L

W%

EAST

WEST

PDR

PAR

RDR

QR

QIR

Heat

25

9

.735

1

 

1

2

6

9

1

Celtics

24

7

.774

2

 

3

1

9

13

T-2

Bulls

21

10

.677

3

 

5

7

1

13

T-2

Magic

21

12

.636

4

 

7

5

2

14

4

Spurs

28

4

.875

 

1

2

11

9

22

5

Lakers

23

10

.697

 

2

4

14

5

23

6

Mavericks

24

7

.774

 

3

6

6

15

27

T-7

Hornets

19

14

.576

 

4

13

3

11

27

T-7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Blazers

17

16

.515

 

5

15

9

12

36

9

Hawks

21

14

.600

5

 

11

8

18

37

10

Bobcats

11

20

.355

6

 

25

11

4

40

11

Jazz

22

11

.667

 

6

8

10

23

41

T-12

Thunder

23

11

.676

 

7

9

20

12

41

T-12

Bucks

12

18

.400

7

 

20

4

17

41

14

Clippers

10

23

.303

 

8

21

19

2

42

15

76ers

13

20

.394

8

 

18

11

19

48

16

Rockets

16

16

.500

 

9

12

24

16

52

17

Pacers

14

17

.452

9

 

17

15

22

54

18

Nuggets

18

13

.581

 

10

10

25

21

56

T-19

Raptors

11

21

.344

10

 

22

26

8

56

T-19

Grizzlies

14

18

.438

 

11

16

17

24

57

21

Nets

9

24

.273

11

 

26

16

20

62

22

Kings

6

23

.207

 

12

28

21

14

63

23

Timberwolves

8

25

.242

 

13

28

30

6

64

24

Knicks

18

14

.562

12

 

14

28

25

67

25

Pistons

11

22

.333

13

 

24

18

27

69

26

Warriors

13

19

.406

 

14

23

27

27

77

27

Suns

14

17

.452

 

15

19

29

30

78

T-28

Wizards

8

23

.258

14

 

27

22

29

78

T-28

Cavaliers

8

24

.250

15

 

30

23

26

79

30

LEGEND: W – Wins; L – Losses; Win% – Winning Percentage; PDR – Points Differential Ranking; PAR – Points Allowed Ranking; RDR – Rebounding Differential Ranking; QR – Quality Rating [i.e. PDR + PAR + RDR = QR]; QIR – Quality Index Ranking [i.e. QR/#1-30]; * – Clinched playoff position.

Given the history of the NBA … and what it actually takes to be able to win 4 consecutive best-of-seven games series in the playoffs … there is now a strong possibility that the 2010-2011 League Championship will eventually be won by 1 of the 8 teams shown above in “neon green”.

To everyone who takes the time to visit this little corner of the blogosphere …

Happy New Year! :-)

How Rick Adelman used individual match-ups to get a road W for Houston

Tuesday, December 21st, 2010

If you look at the straight-forward results for last night’s game between the Rockets and the Warriors:

Houston Rockets 121
GOLDEN STATE WARRIORS 112
Complete Game Info

what you might notice right away is that:

1. Monta Ellis scored 44 points to keep Golden State within striking distance of Houston for the majority of the game;

2. Kevin Martin led the Rockets in scoring with 30 points;

and,

3. Luis Scola had a terrific all-around game for Houston, scoring 20 points and collecting 9 rebounds with 6 assists.

However …

What you might NOT notice right away … unless, of course, if you actually take the time to watch the game AND then:

i. Break it down, possession by possession, with the benefit of:

PART I – The Play-By-Play;

and,

PART II - A “Possession Outcome Chart” for last night’s game …

Time

Team

PG

OG

SF

PF

C

Start

End

Diff

Ellis/Tot

1st Q

Hou

Lowry

Martin

Battier

Hayes

Scola

00

15

+4

 

12:00

GSW

Ellis

Williams

Wright

Amundson

Lee/D

00

11

-4

6 pts

09:08

Time-out: GSW/Short [Hou 11, GSW 4]

 

Hou

Lowry

Martin

Battier

Hayes

Scola

15

22

0

 

06:11

GSW

Ellis

Williams

Wright

Udoh

Lee/D

11

18

0

3 pts/9

04:56

Time-out: GSW/Regular [Hou 17, GSW 13]

02:57

Time-out: Hou/Regular [Hou 22, GSW 18]

 

Hou

Brooks

Martin

Budinger

Hayes

Scola

22

24

-2

 

02:57

GSW

Ellis

Williams

Wright

Udoh

Lee/D

18

22

+2

2 pts/11

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hou

Brooks

Martin

Budinger

Hill

Miller

24

26

-2

 

01:26

GSW

Law

Williams

Wright

Udoh

Lee/D

22

26

+2

 

 

2nd Q

Hou

Brooks

Lee/C

Budinger

Hill

Miller

26

31

+3

 

12:00

GSW

Law

Williams

Wright

Udoh

Lee/D

26

28

-3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hou

Brooks

Lee/C

Budinger

Hill

Miller

31

35

0

 

09:28

GSW

Law

Williams

Carney

Radmanovic

Udoh

28

32

0

 

07:47

Time-out: GSW/Regular [Hou 33, GSW 32]

 

Hou

Brooks

Lee/C

Budinger

Hill

Miller

35

37

+1

 

07:20

GSW

Law

Ellis

Carney

Radmanovic

Udoh

32

33

-1

1 pts/12

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hou

Lowry

Lee/C

Budinger

Hill

Miller

37

40

-3

 

06:16

GSW

Law

Ellis

Carney

Radmanovic

Udoh

33

39

+3

0 pts/12

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hou

Lowry

Lee/C

Budinger

Hayes

Scola

40

41

-2

 

04:42

GSW

Law

Ellis

Carney

Radmanovic

Udoh

39

42

+2

2 pts/14

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hou

Lowry

Lee/C

Battier

Hayes

Scola

41

41

0

 

03:26

GSW

Law

Ellis

Carney

Radmanovic

Udoh

42

42

0

0 pts/14

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hou

Lowry

Martin

Battier

Hayes

Scola

41

50

+5

 

03:12

GSW

Law

Ellis

Carney

Wright

Amundson

42

46

-5

0 pts/14

02:54

Time-out: Hou/Regular [Hou 41, GSW 42]

00:00.4

Time-out: Hou/Short [Hou 48, GSW 46]

 

3rd Q

Hou

Lowry

Martin

Battier

Hayes

Scola

50

61

+3

 

12:00

GSW

Ellis

Williams

Wright

Amundson

Lee/D

46

54

-3

4 pts/18

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hou

Lowry

Martin

Battier

Hayes

Scola

61

70

+2

 

08:05

GSW

Law

Ellis

Williams

Wright

Lee/D

54

61

-2

3 pts/21

07:46

Time-out: GSW/Regular [Hou 63, GSW 54]

 

Hou

Lowry

Martin

Battier

Hayes

Scola

70

73

-4

 

06:00

GSW

Law

Ellis

Williams

Udoh

Lee/D

61

68

+4

5 pts/26

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hou

Lowry

Martin

Battier

Hill

Scola

73

75

0

 

04:26

GSW

Law

Ellis

Williams

Udoh

Lee/D

68

70

0

0 pts/26

02:58

Time-out: Hou/Regular [Hou 75, GSW 70]

 

Hou

Brooks

Lee/C

Battier

Hill

Scola

75

77

+1

 

02:58

GSW

Law

Ellis

Lin

Udoh

Lee/D

70

71

-1

1 pt/27

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hou

Brooks

Lowry

Lee/C

Hill

Miller

77

81

0

 

02:19

GSW

Law

Ellis

Lin

Udoh

Amundson

71

75

0

2 pts/29

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hou

Brooks

Lowry

Lee/C

Hill

Miller

81

 

 

 

00:02.4

GSW

Law

Ellis

Lin

Udoh

Radmanovic

75

 

 

0 pts/29

 

4th Q

Hou

Brooks

Lowry

Lee/C

Hill

Miller

81

89

-4

 

12:00

GSW

Law

Ellis

Lin

Udoh

Radmanovic

75

87

+4

7 pts/36

08:30

Time-out: Hou/Regular [89, GSW 87]

 

Hou

Brooks

Lee/C

Martin

Hill

Scola

89

94

-3

 

08:19

GSW

Law

Ellis

Lin

Udoh

Radmanovic

87

95

+3

4 pts/40

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hou

Brooks

Lee/C

Martin

Battier

Scola

94

94

-1

 

06:16

GSW

Law

Ellis

Lin

Udoh

Radmanovic

95

96

+1

0 pts/40

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hou

Lowry

Lee/C

Martin

Battier

Scola

94

96

+2

 

06:01

GSW

Law

Ellis

Lin

Udoh

Radmanovic

96

96

-2

0 pts/40

05:05

Time-out: GSW/Regular [Hou 96, GSW 96]

 

Hou

Lowry

Lee/C

Martin

Battier

Scola

96

108

+7

 

05:05

GSW

Law

Ellis

Wright

Radmanovic

Lee/D

96

101

-7

2 pts/42

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hou

Lowry

Lee/C

Martin

Battier

Scola

108

121

+2

 

01:54

GSW

Ellis

Williams

Wright

Amundson

Lee/D

101

112

-2

2 pts/44

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hou

Lowry

Lee/C

Martin

Battier

Scola

121

121

0

 

00:18.5

GSW

Ellis

Lin

Wright

Amundson

Lee/D

112

112

0

0 pts/44

Legend:
Bold
– Player was substituted into the game; Italics – Player was moved to a new position; Ellis/Tot – Points scored by Monte Ellis during this shift/Total points scored by Ellis in the game to that point.

 

- When the game changed in the Rockets favour , i.e. Houston went “small” with Battier at the PF position;

 

- When Ellis was on the court and Lee/C was on the court, while Houston was going “small” with 4 guards + 1 Big;

 

- When Ellis was on the court and Lee/C was on the court, while Houston was going “big” with 3 guards + 2 Bigs;

 

- When Ellis was on the court and Lee/C was not on the court;

 

- When Ellis and Lee/C were both on the court, but Houston was going “small” with 3 Guards + 2 Bigs and used Lee/C at the SF/#3 position;

 

- When Lee/C was on the court but Ellis was not on the court;

 

- When neither Ellis, nor Lee/C were on the court.

… are the outstanding contributions of, both, Courtney Lee [OG-SF] and Rick Adelman [Head Coach] in getting the W for Houston.

According to the Box Score data, Courtney Lee finished with a Plus/Minus total of +3 … which was only good enough to rank 6th for the Rockets. 

However …

What a more thorough review of the actual “data” reveals is that:

- Houston took control of this game for the final time at the 6:16 mark of the 4th quarter when Rick Adelman went with a five-man unit that included the following players:

Aaron Brooks, PG
Courtney Lee, OG
Kevin Martin, SF
Shane Battier, PF
Luis Scola, C  

- Courtney Lee only played 23:46 in this game

- 23 of the 44 points which Monta Ellis scored were when Rick Adelman made the mistake of NOT having Courtney Lee on the floor

- Only 14 of the 21 points which Monta Ellis scored when Courtney Lee was on the floor were scored when Lee was being used at the OG position    

- 7 of the 44 points which Monta Ellis scored were when Rick Adelman made the mistake of using a five-man unit that included the following players:

Brooks, PG
Lowry, OG
Lee/C, SF
Hill, PF
Miller, C

during the first 3:41 of the 4th quarter

- Once the Rockets shifted to a five-man unit that included the following players:

Lowry, PG [best defender]
Lee/C, OG [best defender]
Martin, SF
Battier, PF [best defender]
Scola, C [best defender]

which occurred at the 6:01 mark of the 4th quarter; then, Houston was able to open up a 9-point advantage - with 4 of their 5 best defensive players on the court – while holding Monta Ellis firmly in check the rest of the way [i.e. 4 points scored; 1 FGA; 2 FTM, in the last 30 secs, once the game had already been decided]

============================

Kudos to Coach Adelman! 

 

Toronto Raptors, Game 13

Friday, November 19th, 2010

If the Raptors and the Rockets each have their full squads and are operating at their peak levels of effectiveness, then, Houston is the superior team, overall, by a substantial margin.

For this evening’s match-up, however, this is not the situation:

———————————–

TORONTO RAPTORS

HOUSTON ROCKETS

Pos

PERSONNEL

ADV

PERSONNEL

Pos

STARTERS

PG

Jack

=

Lowry

PG

OG

Weems

=

Martin

OG

SF

DeRozan

à

Battier

SF

PF

Evans

à

Scola

PF

C

Bargnani

=

Miller

C

 

0

 

 

+2

 

KEY SUBS

PG

Calderon

ß

Smith

PG

OG

Barbosa

=

Lee

OG

SF

Kleiza

=

Budinger [inj-?]

SF

PF

Johnson

=

Hayes

PF

C

Andersen

=

Hill

C

 

+1

 

 

0

 

RESERVES/EXTRAS/OUTS

PG

Banks

N/A

Taylor

OG

SF

Wright

N/A

Jeffries

SF

PF

Dorsey

N/A

Patterson

PF

PF

Davis [inj-?]

N/A

Brooks [inj-?]

PG

C

Alabi

N/A

Ming [inj-?]

C

 

0

 

 

0

 

COACHING

HC

Triano

à

Adelman

HC

 

0

 

 

+1

 

OVERALL

 

+1

 

 

+3

 

———————————–

When Houston made the decisions:

* To trade Carl Landry and Joey Dorsey to Sacramento, in exchange for Kevin Martin

and,

* To trade Trevor Ariza, essentially, in exchange for Courtney Lee

Daryl Morey made 2 fundamental mistakes in player personnel judgment which will haunt the future development of the Rockets for years to come.

i.e. #1. Despite the “productive individual statistics” Kevin Martin puts up, on a regular basis, he is simply not a bonafide Starter, at the OG position, at least, for a good-to-high end team in the NBA; and, at this point in his career, neither is Courtney Lee. #2. With the departure of Carl Landry, there is now no front-court player coming off the bench for Houston that is capable of giving them enough production in all 3 main phases of the game [i.e. offense, defense and rebounding] to allow them to take significant advantage of the Raptors’ weakness, at the PF and C positions, whenever Luis Scola is out of the game. 

As a result of the injuries to Yao Ming and Aaron Brooks, the current edition of the Rockets only has 2 players in the line-up this evening who will present any sort of major problem at all for the Raptors, from an Individual Match-up standpoint [i.e. identified by the "green" colour in the chart above].

———————————–

Published Wagering Line

Opening: Houston -1.5

Current: Houston -1.5

———————————–

KSS Prognostication

As long as Jay Triano utilizes his available chess pieces properly … and does not make any major in-game gaffes … and, the combination of Amir Johnson + Reggie Evans + Joey Dorsey + Linas Kleiza can reasonably contain the scoring exploits of Luis Scola, then, the Raptors should have more than enough weaponry at each of the other positions on the floor to win tonight’s game outright, on their home court.

At the moment, the Rockets are in the midst of a serious tailspin, and they will not be able to work their way out of it with the personnel they have on hand.

End of NBA Regular Season, Quality Index Rankings, #1-30

Thursday, April 15th, 2010

At the conclusion of an 82 game schedule …

 

LEGITIMATE CONTENDERS TO WIN THE NBA CHAMPIONSHIP

[as of Thursday April 15, 2010]

 

TEAM

W

L

W%

EAST

WEST

PDR

PAR

RDR

QR

QIR

Cavaliers *

61

21

.744

1

 

2

5

1

8

1

Magic *

59

23

.720

2

 

1

4

4

9

2

Spurs *

50

32

.610

 

7

4

8

3

15

3

Jazz *

53

29

.646

 

5

3

12

5

20

4

Blazers *

50

32

.610

 

6

11

3

7

21

5

Lakers *

57

25

.695

 

1

6

9

7

22

6

Heat *

47

35

.573

5

 

13

2

11

26

T-7

Bobcats *

44

38

.537

7

 

15

1

10

26

T-7

Thunder *

50

32

.610

 

8

10

11

6

27

9

Hawks *

53

29

.646

3

 

6

9

16

31

10

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bucks *

46

36

.561

6

 

14

7

17

38

11

Celtics *

50

32

.610

4

 

9

5

25

39

12

Bulls *

41

41

.500

8

 

18

13

9

40

13

Grizzlies

40

42

.488

 

 

17

24

2

43

14

Suns *

54

28

.659

 

3

5

26

13

44

15

Nuggets *

53

29

.646

 

4

8

20

22

50

16

Mavericks *

55

27

.671

 

2

12

15

24

51

17

Pistons

27

55

.329

 

 

27

13

12

52

18

Rockets

42

40

.512

 

 

16

21

21

58

19

76ers

27

55

.329

 

 

24

18

18

60

T-20

Clippers

29

53

.354

 

 

28

19

13

60

T-20

Wizards

26

56

.317

 

 

26

16

19

61

22

Kings

25

57

.305

 

 

25

25

15

65

23

Hornets

37

45

.451

 

 

20

21

26

67

24

Raptors

40

42

.488

9

 

19

27

22

68

25

Pacers

32

50

.390

 

 

21

23

29

73

T-26

Nets

12

70

.146

 

 

29

17

27

73

T-26

Knicks

29

53

.354

 

 

23

27

28

78

T-28

Timberwolves

15

67

.183

 

 

30

29

19

78

T-28

Warriors

26

56

.317

 

 

22

30

30

82

30

LEGEND: W – Wins; L – Losses; Win% – Winning Percentage; PDR – Points Differential Ranking; PAR – Points Allowed Ranking; RDR – Rebounding Differential Ranking; QR – Quality Rating [i.e. PDR + PAR + RDR = QR]; QIR – Quality Index Ranking [i.e. QR/#1-30]; * – Clinched playoff position.

there are now 10 teams left with a legitimate opportunity to win this year’s league championship … none of which are the Mavericks [W2], Suns [W3], Nuggets [W4], Celtics [E4], Bucks [E6] or Bulls [E8], according to the recent history of the NBA.

Related:

What it takes to win the NBA Championship

Legitimate contenders in the NBA, as of April 5

Tuesday, April 6th, 2010

With a little more than 1 week left in the regular season schedule …

 

LEGITIMATE CONTENDERS TO WIN THE NBA CHAMPIONSHIP

[as of Monday April 5, 2010]

 

TEAM

W

L

W%

EAST

WEST

PDR

PAR

RDR

QR

QIR

Cavaliers *

60

17

.779

1

 

1

5

2

8

1

Magic *

54

23

.701

2

 

2

4

4

10

2

Spurs *

47

29

.618

 

7

4

7

4

15

3

Jazz *

50

27

.649

 

4

3

12

6

21

T-4

Lakers *

55

22

.714

 

1

5

9

7

21

T-4

Blazers *

47

30

.610

 

8

11

3

8

22

6

Thunder *

48

28

.623

 

6

10

10

3

23

7

Heat

43

34

.558

5

 

12

2

10

24

8

Bobcats

40

36

.528

7

 

15

1

11

31

9

Hawks *

49

27

.645

3

 

6

10

18

34

10

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bucks

42

34

.553

6

 

14

8

17

39

11

Celtics *

48

28

.632

4