Posts Tagged ‘Doc Rivers’

When the Lakers needed him, Ron-Ron was there … playing in the moment

Friday, June 18th, 2010

Over the last 13 months, this is some of what’s been written in this space about the Lakers’ mercurial one: 

Ron Artest is a foxhole guy … [May 7, 2009]

Yet another reason to root-root for Ron-Ron this season [Jan 14, 2010]

In the wee hours of this morning, in the aftermath of Los Angeles’ victory in Game 7, this is what was said about him by the ZenMaster, himself, and Doc Rivers, and Glen Davis, and Sekou Smith:

Artest Sings Redemption’s Song

Kobe Bryant walked out of the Staples Center Thursday night with his fifth NBA title and his second straight Finals MVP. He praised the “Spaniard” [Pau Gasol] specifically for all his help in reaching this career milestone.

The MVP on this night, however, was none other than Ron Artest.

No one walked out of the building without seeing that, not after his 20 points, five rebounds, five steals and iron will helped drag the Lakers back from a 13-point deficit to beat back a Celtics team that controlled the action for much of the night.

“Ron Artest was the most valuable player tonight,” Lakers coach Phil Jackson said. “He brought life to our team, he brought life to the crowd.”

————————————————-

June 17 2010, Part I

June 17 2010, Part II

 

————————————————-

Kudos to the man … from Queensbridge, NY … who always seeks to KEEP IT REAL! :-)

 

Related:

Artest delivers crazy finish to title

How the Lakers have managed to lose 3 games, so far, in the NBA Finals

Tuesday, June 15th, 2010

The Lakers have slightly better personnel, overall, than the Boston Celtics.

Yet, the Lakers are trailing 2-3, in this series.

Q1. How come?

A1. Primarily, because … at least, to this point … Phil Jackson is being out-coached by Doc Rivers, when it comes to using his personnel properly.

If you take a closer look at the simple game stats for the series, so far, for the players each team is using at the Power Forward and Center positions, this is what you should be able to see:

BOSTON CELTICS

Role

STARTERS

KEY SUBS

Pos

PF/C

C

PF

PF/C

Player

Garnett

Perkins

Davis

Wallace

 

MP

PTS

REB

AST

TO

BS

MP

PTS

REB

AST

TO

BS

MP

PTS

REB

AST

TO

BS

MP

PTS

REB

AST

TO

BS

G1

34:47

16

4

1

1

1

24:25

8

3

1

1

0

18:36

3

3

1

1

0

18:12

9

4

0

1

1

G2

23:43

6

4

6

0

0

31:47

12

6

3

2

0

18:10

8

7

1

1

1

18:07

7

7

1

1

0

G3

31:45

25

6

3

3

1

21:42

5

11

1

2

0

23:42

12

3

0

3

0

18:40

2

4

3

0

1

G4

26:30

13

6

3

2

1

24:41

6

7

0

0

0

22:29

18

5

0

0

0

21:45

3

2

0

1

0

G5

36:09

18

10

3

3

2

31:38

4

7

1

2

0

13:09

0

3

1

0

0

14:45

5

4

0

0

1

G6

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

G7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LOS ANGELES LAKERS

Role

STARTERS

KEY SUBS

Pos

PF/C

C

PF

C

Player

Gasol

Bynum

Odom

?

 

MP

PTS

REB

AST

TO

BS

MP

PTS

REB

AST

TO

BS

MP

PTS

REB

AST

TO

BS

MP

PTS

REB

AST

TO

BS

G1

46:34

23

14

3

3

3

28:09

10

6

0

1

0

21:17

5

4

1

2

1

-

-

-

-

-

-

G2

41:58

25

8

3

1

6

39:00

21

6

0

2

7

14:38

3

5

1

1

0

-

-

-

-

-

-

G3

38:58

13

10

4

1

2

29:11

9

10

0

1

1

27:51

12

5

1

1

0

-

-

-

-

-

-

G4

44:10

21

6

3

4

2

12:10

2

3

0

1

0

39:05

10

7

1

1

0

-

-

-

-

-

-

G5

38:05

12

12

0

1

0

31:38

6

1

0

1

0

26:17

8

8

2

3

0

-

-

-

-

-

-

G6

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

G7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Power Forward and Center Stats

During 3 Boston Wins

Game

CELTICS

LAKERS

PTS

REBS

AST

TO

BS

PTS

REBS

AST

TO

BS

2

33

24/+

11/+

4/0

1/-

49

19/-

4/-

4/0

13/+

4

40

20/+

3/-

3/+

1/-

33

16/-

4/+

6/-

2/+

5

27

24/+

5/+

5/0

3/+

26

21/-

2/-

5/0

0/-

 

Power Forward and Center Stats

During 2 Lakers Wins

Game

CELTICS

LAKERS

PTS

REBS

AST

TO

BS

PTS

REBS

AST

TO

BS

1

36

14/-

3/-

4/+

2/-

38

24/+

4/+

6/-

4/+

3

44

24/-

6/+

8/-

2/-

34

25/+

5/-

3/+

3/-

 

Boston is gradually … and, seemingly, inevitably … wearing down Pau Gasol because Phil Jackson is refusing to play Josh Powell, when the Celtics’ consistent use of 4 Bigs [i.e. Garnett & Perkins and Davis & Wallace] … vs just 3 Bigs … DICTATES THAT HE SHOULD RESPOND IN PRECISELY THIS MANNER.

As was first said here in the NBA Finals Preview …

What you should expect from this year’s NBA Finals [June 3 2010]

… the Lakers are, in fact, the better team in this specific match-up, except, of course, if Phil Jackson manages to get out-coached by Doc Rivers, for example, by refusing to use Josh Powell [PF] vs Glen Davis [PF], which would effectively lessen the load that Pau Gasol [PF/C] is working under trying to play against BOTH Kevin Garnett [PF/C] AND Rasheed Wallace [PF/C].

It will be extremely interesting to see:

i. How many minutes Pau Gasol, Andrew Bynum and Lamar Odom are going to play in Game 6 [and, possibly, Game 7];

ii. How effective Pau Gasol, Andrew Bynum and Lamar Odom are during the minutes which they play in Game 6 [and, possibly, Game 7]; and,

iii. Whether, or not, Phil Jackson finally decides to use a bench player with the specific skill-set of Josh Powell [PF] properly;

with only 1 rest day [and a coast-to-coast airplane flight, with a 3 hour time change] between Game 5 and Game 6, and then between Game 6 and Game 7.

—————————-

Related:

Who has outcoached Doc Rivers?

—————————-

PS. Those who perpetually under-value the work and ability of Doc Rivers, and/or the fundamental role played by an authentically elite level head coach in the day-to-day performance of NBA teams and players simply demonstrate that they fail to understand how the game of basketball actually works.

What you should expect from this year’s NBA Finals

Thursday, June 3rd, 2010

The NBA Finals [v.2009-2010] tip off this evening in Los Angeles.

                       

LEGITIMATE CONTENDERS IN THE NBA PLAYOFFS

[as of Thursday April 15, 2010]

 

TEAM

W

L

W%

EAST

WEST

PDR

PAR

RDR

QR

QIR

Celtics

50

32

.610

4

 

9

5

25

39

12

Lakers

57

25

.695

 

1

6

9

7

22

6

LEGEND: W – Wins; L – Losses; Win% - Winning Percentage; PDR – Points Differential Ranking; PAR – Points Allowed Ranking; RDR – Rebounding Differential Ranking; QR – Quality Rating [i.e. PDR + PAR + RDR = QR]; QIR – Quality Index Ranking [i.e. QR/#1-16].

While Rounds 1, 2 and 3 have produced some fair-to-good basketball, this version of the Finals should prove to be an entirely different kettle of fish.

 

NBA PLAYOFFS
4th Round [FINALS] MATCH-UP

 

Celtics

50

32

.610

4

 

9

5

25

39

12

Lakers

57

25

.695

 

1

6

9

7

22

6

STARTERS

Rajon Rondo

Ray Allen

Paul Pierce

Kevin Garnett

Kendrick Perkins

ß

à

=

=

=

Derek Fisher

Kobe Bryant

Ron Artest

Pau Gasol

Andrew Bynum

+1

Sub-Total

+1

KEY SUBS

Tony Allen

Glen Davis

Rasheed Wallace

=

=

à

Shannon Brown

Josh Powell

Lamar Odom

0

Sub-Total

+1

OTHERS

Nate Robinson

Michael Finley

Marquis Daniels

Shelden Williams

=

=

=

=

Jordan Farmar

Sasha Vujacic

Luke Walton

DJ Mbenga

COACHING

Doc Rivers

à

Phil Jackson

0

Sub-Total

0

+1

TOTAL

+2

Analysis: If Kevin Garnett was 100% healthy and fully recovered from his knee injury of last season, then, the Celtics might actually be the correct pick in this match-up. Although he seems to be regaining some of his former vertical explosiveness and a good deal of his horizontal speed, his lateral quickness and agility are still not back to what they were 2 seasons ago, when he was one of the best defensive players in the history of the NBA.

 

Conversely, when the Lakers are relatively healthy – which they haven’t been for much of this season - they are simply the best team in the NBA this year. Although the Celtics’ Starting 5 is formidable, the Lakers should be able to withstand the initial on-slaught … if they use their bench players properly … and, then, gradually wear Boston down over the course of a physically grueling series.

 

Shortening Boston’s rotation should not produce an advantage for the Celtics against this opponent.

 

Pick: LOS ANGELES has the home court advantage this time and should win in 6 [or, perhaps, 7] games.

 

[Caveat: If Phil Jackson should happen to get out-coached – e.g. refusing to use Josh Powell vs Glen Davis – by Doc Rivers, then, the Celtics could well capitalize and win this series.] 

These 2 teams are quite evenly matched.

The Lakers, however, signed Ron Artest last summer for one reason only.

i.e. To have him defend either LeBron James or Paul Pierce in the NBA Finals. 

If Ron Ron does his job properly, from a physical standpoint, and can play Da Truth to a virtual stand-off, then … all else being equal … the Lakers will be hoisting another championship banner to the rafters when the 2010-2011 kicks off in the fall.

It really is as simple as that.

Enjoy what should be a real hum-dinger of a series!

17th year anniversary for Doc Rivers and the ZenMaster

Wednesday, June 2nd, 2010

The Year was 1993.

The Date was June 2.

The Round was the Eastern Conference Finals.

The Game was #5. 

The Combatants were: [i] The mighty Chicago Bulls … coached by Phil Jackson … and, [ii] The insurgent New York Knicks … with a Point Guard [and an irstwhile head coach] named Glenn “Doc” Rivers [#25].

The Big Plays … both, made and not made … coming down-the-stretch and, in particular, the final moments … have become indelibly etched in the memory banks of any true NBA connoisseur.

The Charles Smith, Game 5

* Michael Jordan, 29 pts, 10 rebounds and 14 assists

* “You got to have a very strong will and a very big heart, if you go down the lane against the New York Knicks.” - Mike Fratello [TV Analyst]

* 4 failed layup attempts to take the lead on the final possession for the losing team

* Defense is the backbone

What the NBA Playoffs are supposed to be about!

———-

Related:

Doc and Phil were there (and so was Charles Smith), 17 years ago today

Yo, Adrian …

Thursday, May 27th, 2010

… it may be too late for certain members of the basketball community to offer an apology to the Orlando Magic.

For the record:

PART A

This is what esteemed basketball writer Adrian Wojnarowski had to say about the state of the Boston Celtics vs Orlando Magic playoff series on Monday, May 25:

———————————

Magic provide only a tease in East finals

Until they prove differently, these Magic are exactly a team that wanted to win one game and say it didn’t get swept. There’s still no explanation for that gutless Game 3 performance, for giving away Games 1 and 2 in Orlando.

“Yeah, you’ve got to play one game at a time, but you have to have a belief somewhere that you can win the series,” Van Gundy insisted. “Otherwise, there’s just not enough to sustain you and keep you in the game.”

That isn’t true, because the Celtics obliterated the Magic’s spirit with those victories in Orlando and everyone could see that on Saturday night in Boston. When it mattered most, the Magic backed down and quit. This wasn’t character on Monday night, just the Magic hanging around and stealing a game when the Celtics looked like they had the Los Angeles Lakers on their minds.

This wasn’t resolve out of the Magic, this was merely a stay of execution. Yes, someone asked Vince Carter where did that resolve come from, and the first word out of his mouth? “Within.”

Within what? Within the make-believe land where a $16 million-a-year player pretends he has the professional pride of his tiny point guard and monstrous center? There are no historic comebacks coming out of the Orlando Magic, no proving to the world why they never should have been counted out. The Magic had that chance in this series and it’s long gone now.

No validation in victory on Monday night, just indictment – just a shame that it took this long out of the Magic, that it never, ever should’ve come to this in the Eastern Conference finals.

———————————

PART B

Now, today, 3 days and 2 hard-earned victories by the Magic later, this what Mr. Wojnarowski is saying:

———————————

Bruised Celtics need a leg to stand in Game 6

The tone and trajectory of the series have changed dramatically because Boston is battered, beleaguered and no longer playing peerless ball. In a month when the Boston Bruins lost a 3-0 series lead to the Philadelphia Flyers, in a city that lived the ecstasy of the Red Sox’s forever comeback from 3-0 on the Yankees, there promises to be genuine tension in the Garden. “We made it look easy early on and now it is becoming a fight,” the Celtics’ Kevin Garnett(notes) said.

———————————

Really?

The “tone” and “trajectory” of this series have now changed?

PART C

In sharp contrast to what Mr. Wojnarowski has written about this series to-date …

This is what’s been said in this space over the course of the last week:

What Stan Van Gundy needs to do in order to generate open shots for Rashard Lewis [Thu May 20]

What Doc Rivers has done to create individual match-up advantages vs Orlando [Thu May 20]

Specific reasons the Orlando Magic will win Game 5 and Game 6 [Tue May 25]

and

First time for everything … [Wed May 26]

If you are going to spend some of your time reading material on-line about what’s important in the NBA game it’s a good idea that you make your choices wisely. :-)

============================

Item #1.

The exact moment this series changed in Orlando’s favour … had nothing to do with Dwight Howard, the Magic’s best player, but … was when SVG finally made the decision to include/add Brandon Bass to his regular rotation against the specific group of players Doc Rivers was using for Boston.

Item #2.

As long as the Magic could manage to “stay alive”, each game longer this series actually goes, Doc Rivers’ strategic decision to use only 4 players [in total] at the Point Guard, Off Guard and Small Forward positions … which was specifically what provided the Celtics with their extra boost in TEAM COHESION and EXECUTION during the initial games of the series, relative to what Orlando was producing … becomes more problematic for the men from Beantown.

 

MINUTES PLAYED PER GAME and OFF DAYS

 

PLAYER

POS

G1

 

1

 

off

 

day

G2

 

3

 

off

 

days

G3

 

1

 

off

 

day

G4

 

1

 

off

 

day

G5

 

1

 

off

 

day

G6

 

1

 

off

 

day

G7

Rondo

PG

46

45

34

43

38

?

?

R-Allen

OG

39

40

38

46

41

?

?

Pierce

SF

42

40

35

47

42

?

?

T-Allen

SF/PG

17

15

18

12

11

?

?

 

 

W

W

W

L

L

?

?

In fact, not only are the Celtics’ Big Men “battered and bruised” but so, too, are their main players in the back-court positions now beginning to run out of gas. 

Item #3.

If SVG was actually willing to implement EACH of the other suggestions made in this space, since this series first began, there’s a very good chance that the specific outcomes for Game 6 and 7 would see Orlando win both by sizable margins.

Item #4.

Orlando is a superior team to Boston, as long as [1] Kevin Garnett is not 100% healthy, and [2] SVG does not get out-coached by Doc Rivers … by using his personnel in the wrong way and failing to implement the most effective game-plan [i.e. offensively, defensively and in terms of rebounding] … which is precisely what happened in Games 1, 2 and 3 of this series. 

Item #5.

When 2 legitimate heavy-weights go at it, it is prudent to wait until the full 15 rounds …

i.e. Game 1/rounds 1-3; Game 2/rounds 4-6; Game 3/rounds 7-9; Game 4/rounds 10-11; Game 5/rounds 12-13; Game 6/round 14; and, Game 7/round 15

… have actually been completed, in order to determine the winner.

Specific reasons the Orlando Magic will win Game 5 and Game 6

Tuesday, May 25th, 2010

With their victory in last night’s Game 4:

Orlando Magic 96
BOSTON CELTICS 92, OT
Complete Game Summary

the Magic have now forced a Game 5, back in Orlando, on Wednesday night [May 26, 835 PM ET] … which is good news for all those who originally forecast this to be a long series.

Despite what some reputable NBA observers might have to say today about the poor way Orlando has performed to-date …

————————————————————

Magic provide only a tease in East finals

Until they prove differently, these Magic are exactly a team that wanted to win one game and say it didn’t get swept. There’s still no explanation for that gutless Game 3 performance, for giving away Games 1 and 2 in Orlando.

“Yeah, you’ve got to play one game at a time, but you have to have a belief somewhere that you can win the series,” Van Gundy insisted. “Otherwise, there’s just not enough to sustain you and keep you in the game.”

That isn’t true, because the Celtics obliterated the Magic’s spirit with those victories in Orlando and everyone could see that on Saturday night in Boston. When it mattered most, the Magic backed down and quit. This wasn’t character on Monday night, just the Magic hanging around and stealing a game when the Celtics looked like they had the Los Angeles Lakers on their minds.

This wasn’t resolve out of the Magic, this was merely a stay of execution. Yes, someone asked Vince Carter where did that resolve come from, and the first word out of his mouth? “Within.”

Within what? Within the make-believe land where a $16 million-a-year player pretends he has the professional pride of his tiny point guard and monstrous center? There are no historic comebacks coming out of the Orlando Magic, no proving to the world why they never should have been counted out. The Magic had that chance in this series and it’s long gone now.

No validation in victory on Monday night, just indictment – just a shame that it took this long out of the Magic, that it never, ever should’ve come to this in the Eastern Conference finals.

————————————————————

… the facts are that:

1. The primary reason Orlando is trailing in this series in the first place is because of the poor job of coaching which Stan Van Gundy [i.e. SVG] did in Games 1, 2 and 3, putting their players in a gigantic hole, relative to the stellar work done by his counterpart with Boston, Doc Rivers.

If in doubt of this, please see Exhibits A, BC and D.

2. [In spite of this] Orlando has still managed to play “well enough” to only lose Game 1 by a mere 4 points [i.e. 2 possessions] and Game 2 by a mere 3 points … while getting decidedly underwhelming performances from several of their key players [i.e. including: i. Vince Carter's untimely 2 missed FTA's in the final minute of Game 2; ii. Minimal point production from Rashard Lewis and Mickael Pietrus in Games 1, 2 and 3; Minimal point production from Dwight Howard in Games 1 and 3; iii. Poor defensive efforts from Matt Barnes and Marcin Gortat in Games 1, 2 and 3; iv. Minimal point production from Vince Carter in Game 3; and, v. Poor play, overall, by Jameer Nelson].

3. SVG has, at last, begun to unravel correctly the Rotation Riddle of this group of Celtics … which included his use of:

i. Both Brandon Bass and Ryan Anderson, in Game 3, for the first time in this series, albeit for inconsequential minutes during garbage time;

ii. Bass, again, in Game 4 … this time for significant minutes during non-garbage time … albeit in, both, “right” [i.e. vs Glen Davis] and “wrong” [i.e. vs anybody else] individual match-up situations;

and,

iii. Vince Carter [vs Ray Allen or Rajon Rondo] and Mickael Pietrus [vs Paul Pierce] together for the first segment of meaningful minutes in the series to-date.

 

SUBSTITUTION CHART

 

Boston Celtics vs Orlando Magic

 

[Mon May 24 2010]

 

Time

Team

PG

OG

SF

PF

C

Start

End

Diff

    Q1

Orl

Nelson

Carter

Barnes

Lewis

Howard

00

18

+4

12:00

BOS

Rondo

R-Allen

Pierce

Garnett

Perkins

00

14

-4

[07:19]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

04:41

 

Time-out:

Regular

Boston

Orl 18

BOS 14

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Orl

Nelson

Carter

Barnes

Bass

Howard

18

18

0

04:41

BOS

Rondo

R-Allen

Pierce

Garnett

Perkins

14

14

0

[00:06]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Orl

Nelson

Carter

Barnes

Bass

Howard

18

21

+3

04:35

BOS

T-Allen

R-Allen

Pierce

Garnett

Perkins

14

14

-3

[00:57]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Orl

Nelson

Carter

Barnes

Bass

Howard

21

23

-1

03:38

BOS

T-Allen

Finley

Pierce

Garnett

Perkins

14

17

+1

[00:27]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Orl

Nelson

Redick

Barnes

Bass

Howard

23

23

-3

03:11

BOS

T-Allen

Finley

Pierce

Garnett

Wallace

17

20

+3

[00:30]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

02:41

 

Time-out:

Regular

Orlando

Orl 23

BOS 19

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Orl

Nelson

Redick

Barnes

Bass

Gortat

23

24

-1

02:41

BOS

T-Allen

Finley

Pierce

Davis

Wallace

20

22

+1

[00:51]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Orl

Nelson

Redick

Barnes

Lewis

Gortat

24

31

+3

01:50

BOS

T-Allen

Finley

Pierce

Davis

Wallace

22

26

-3

[01:50]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Q2

Orl

Nelson

Redick

Pietrus

Lewis

Howard

31

31

-2

12:00

BOS

T-Allen

Finley

Pierce

Davis

Wallace

26

28

+2

[01:19]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Orl

Nelson

Redick

Pietrus

Lewis

Howard

31

34

+3

10:41

BOS

T-Allen

R-Allen

Finley

Davis

Wallace

28

28

-3

[00:37]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Orl

Williams

Redick

Pietrus

Lewis

Howard

34

34

0

10:04

BOS

Robinson

R-Allen

Finley

Davis

Wallace

28

28

0

[01:01]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Orl

Williams

Redick

Pietrus

Lewis

Howard

34

34

0

09:03

BOS

Robinson

R-Allen

Finley

Davis

Garnett

28

28

0

[00:04]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

08:59

 

Time-out:

Official

 

Orl 34

BOS 28

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Orl

Williams

Redick

Pietrus

Lewis

Howard

34

40

+2

08:59

BOS

Rondo

R-Allen

Finley

Davis

Garnett

28

32

-2

[03:12]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

06:09

 

Time-out:

Regular

Boston

Orl 40

BOS 32

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Orl

Williams

Carter

Pietrus

Bass

Howard

40

41

+1

06:09

BOS

Rondo

R-Allen

Pierce

Garnett

Perkins

32

32

-1

[00:23]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Orl

Nelson

Carter

Pietrus

Bass

Howard

41

43

-3

05:47

BOS

Rondo

R-Allen

Pierce

Garnett

Perkins

32

37

+3

[00:51]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Orl

Nelson

Carter

Barnes

Bass

Howard

43

43

-2

04:56

BOS

Rondo

R-Allen

Pierce

Garnett

Perkins

37

39

+2

[01:36]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Orl

Nelson

Carter

Barnes

Bass

Gortat

43

43

0

03:20

BOS

Rondo

R-Allen

Pierce

Garnett

Perkins

39

39

0

[00:26]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

02:54

 

Time-out:

Regular

Orlando

Orl 43

BOS 39

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Orl

Nelson

Carter

Barnes

Lewis

Gortat

43

43

-1

02:54

BOS

Rondo

R-Allen

Pierce

Garnett

Perkins

39

40

+1

[00:09]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Orl

Nelson

Redick

Barnes

Lewis

Howard

43

48

+2

02:45

BOS

Rondo

R-Allen

Pierce

Garnett

Perkins

40

43

-2

[01:30]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Orl

Nelson

Redick

Pietrus

Lewis

Gortat

48

48

0

01:15

BOS

T-Allen

R-Allen

Pierce

Garnett

Perkins

43

43

0

[00:11]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Orl

Nelson

Redick

Pietrus

Lewis

Gortat

48

51

-1

01:04

BOS

Robinson

R-Allen

Pierce

Garnett

Perkins

43

47

+1

[01:04]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Q3

Orl

Nelson

Carter

Barnes

Lewis

Howard

51

62

-2

12:00

BOS

Rondo

R-Allen

Pierce

Garnett

Perkins

47

60

+2

[06:44]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Orl

Nelson

Redick

Barnes

Bass

Gortat

62

67

+3

05:16

BOS

Rondo

R-Allen

Pierce

Garnett

Perkins

60

62

-3

[01:38]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Orl

Nelson

Redick

Barnes

Bass

Gortat

67

67

-4

03:38

BOS

Rondo

R-Allen

Pierce

Davis

Wallace

62

66

+4

[02:28]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

01:10

 

Time-out:

Regular

Boston

Orl 67

BOS 66

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Orl

Williams

Redick

Pietrus

Bass

Gortat

67

67

-2

01:10

BOS

T-Allen

R-Allen

Pierce

Davis

Wallace

66

68

+2

[00:51]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Orl

Nelson

Redick

Pietrus

Lewis

Gortat

67

67

0

00:19

BOS

T-Allen

R-Allen

Daniels

Davis

Wallace

68

68

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Q4

Orl

Williams

Redick

Pietrus

Lewis

Howard

67

71

+4 *

12:00

BOS

Rondo

R-Allen

T-Allen

Davis

Wallace

68

68

-4

[01:30]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Orl

Williams

Redick

Pietrus

Lewis

Howard

71

71

0

10:30

BOS

Rondo

T-Allen

Pierce

Davis

Wallace

68

68

0

[01:15]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Orl

Williams

Redick

Carter

Lewis

Howard

71

74

+1

09:15

BOS

Rondo

T-Allen

Pierce

Davis

Garnett

68

70

-1

[01:03]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

08:12

 

Time-out:

Official

 

Orl 74

BOS 70

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

08:12

Orl

Nelson

Redick

Carter

Lewis

Howard

74

81

-1

[04:15]

BOS

Rondo

T-Allen

Pierce

Davis

Garnett

70

78

+1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

05:33

 

Time-out:

Regular

Boston

Orl 74

BOS 76

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Orl

Nelson

Redick

Barnes

Lewis

Howard

81

85

-1

03:57

BOS

Rondo

T-Allen

Pierce

Davis

Garnett

78

83

+1

[02:17]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

02:53

 

Time-out:

Regular

Orlando

Orl 81

BOS 78

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

01:40

 

Time-out:

Regular

Orlando

Orl 85

BOS 83

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Orl

Nelson

Redick

Carter

Lewis

Howard

85

86

+1

01:40

BOS

Rondo

T-Allen

Pierce

Davis

Garnett

83

83

-1

[00:11]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Orl

Nelson

Carter

Barnes

Lewis

Howard

86

86

-3

01:29

BOS

Rondo

T-Allen

Pierce

Davis

Garnett

83

86

+3

[00:14]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Orl

Nelson

Redick

Carter

Lewis

Howard

86

86

0

01:15

BOS

Rondo

T-Allen

Pierce

Davis

Garnett

86

86

0

[01:15]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

00:24

 

Time-out:

Short

Orlando

Orl 86

BOS 86

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

OT

Orl

Nelson

Redick

Carter

Lewis

Howard

86

92

+6

05:00

BOS

Rondo

R-Allen

Pierce

Garnett

Perkins

86

86

-6

[03:01]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

01:59

 

Time-out:

Regular

Boston

Orl 92

BOS 86

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Orl

Carter

Pietrus

Barnes

Lewis

Howard

92

92

-3

01:59

BOS

Rondo

R-Allen

Pierce

Davis

Garnett

86

89

+3

[00:13]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

01:46

 

Time-out:

Regular

Orlando

Orl 92

BOS 89

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Orl

Nelson

Redick

Carter

Lewis

Howard

92

94

+2

01:46

BOS

Rondo

R-Allen

Pierce

Davis

Garnett

89

89

-2

[00:16]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Orl

Carter

Pietrus

Barnes

Lewis

Howard

94

94

-3

01:30

BOS

Rondo

R-Allen

Pierce

Garnett

Perkins

89

92

+3

[00:17]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

01:13

 

Time-out:

Short

Orlando

Orl 94

BOS 92

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Orl

Nelson

Redick

Carter

Lewis

Howard

94

96

+2

01:13

BOS

Rondo

R-Allen

Pierce

Garnett

Perkins

92

92

-2

[00:21]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

00:52

 

Time-out:

Short

Boston

Orl 96

Bos 92

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Orl

Nelson

Carter

Barnes

Lewis

Howard

96

96

0

00:52

BOS

Rondo

R-Allen

Pierce

Garnett

Perkins

92

92

0

[00:10]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Orl

Nelson

Redick

Carter

Lewis

Howard

96

96

0

00:42

BOS

Rondo

R-Allen

Pierce

Garnett

Perkins

92

92

0

[00:42]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Orl

Carter

Redick

Pietrus

Lewis

Howard

96

96

0

00:09

BOS

Rondo

R-Allen

Pierce

Garnett

Perkins

92

92

0

LEGEND: * - Technical Foul called on Rasheed Wallace which changed the rhythm of the rest of the game.

4. If SVG continues to implement the series of specific adjustments suggested in this space last week - i.e. see Exhibits A, B, C and D [above] - then the Magic will continue to improve their play as this series progresses.

5. If SVG continues to implement specific “set play offensive system” adjustments … like what was advocated in this space last week:

i. Increased “#1-#5 Pick and Rolls with #4 stationed in the original Weak Side Corner”;

and, what was on display in yesterday’s Game 4:

ii. The introduction of “#1-#4 Pick and Pops with #5 Clean-up Flare Screens for #4″;

iii. The introduction of ”#1-#5 and #4 Staggered Picks and Roll/Pops”;

to create higher quality shot attempts for [a more aggressively "driving and dishing"] Nelson, Howard and Lewis … then the Magic’s scoring output per game will continue to increase as this series progresses.

6. Good-to-great basketball players the world over - and throughout the history of the game - are only as good, or bad … in the playoffs … as their coach is actually capable of putting them into the correct positions to succeed … both, individually and collectively … when matched-up against a high calibre opponent, just as good or better than they are [i.e. in terms of players and coaches]. 

7. This series is still a long way from being over.  :-)

What Doc Rivers has done to create individual match-up advantages vs Orlando

Thursday, May 20th, 2010

Doc Rivers …

By using:

* Only 3 players at the Point Guard and Off Guard positions;

* Only 2 players at the Small Forward position, with 1 of these players also functioning as the team’s Back-up Point Guard; and,

* 4 players at the Power Forward and Center positions;

has developed a tight 8-man rotation for the Celtics:

BOSTON CELTICS

ORLANDO MAGIC

Game

1/MP

2/MP

#

Game

1/MP

2/MP

POINT GUARD and OFF GUARD

Rondo

46

45

1

Nelson

38

38

R-Allen

39

40

2

Carter

41

26

T-Allen

17

15

3

Redick

20

34

 

 

 

4

Williams

10

10

SMALL FORWARD

Pierce

42

40

5

Barnes

15

21

T-Allen

 

 

6

Pietrus

20

16

 

 

 

 

Carter

 

 

POWER FORWARD and CENTER

Garnett

34

35

7

Lewis

42

41

Perkins

26

15

8

Howard

39

40

Davis

15

28

9

Gortat

14

15

Wallace

20

18

 

 

 

 

OTHERS

Robinson

DNP-CD

DNP-CD

10

Johnson

DNP-CD

DNP-CD

Finley

1

5

 

 

 

 

Daniels

DNP-CD

DNP-CD

 

 

 

 

Williams

DNP-CD

 

11

Bass

DNP-CD

DNP-CD

Scalabrine

 

DNP-CD

12

Anderson

DNP-CD

DNP-CD

Score

92

95

 

Score

88

92

which has controlled the individual player match-ups in this series and, in the process, created levels of Team Cohesion and Execution [i.e. Offensively, Defensively, and Rebounding-wise] that are superior to what Orlando has been able to muster.

These two things are what have allowed Boston to establish early leads in both Game 1 and Game 2 and, then, forced Orlando to play catch-up for the balance of those contests.

What Stan Van Gundy needs to do now, in response, in order to counter these advantages, is:

BOSTON CELTICS

ORLANDO MAGIC

#

Game

3/MP

#

Game

3/MP

POINT GUARD and OFF GUARD

1

Rondo

46

1

Nelson

46

2

R-Allen

39

2

Carter

39

3

T-Allen

17

3

Barnes [or Redick or Williams]

17

SMALL FORWARD

4

Pierce

42

4

Pietrus

42

 

T-Allen

 

 

Barnes [or Redick]

 

POWER FORWARD and CENTER

5

Garnett

34

5

Lewis

34

6

Perkins

26

6

Howard [or Gortat]

32

7

Davis

15

7

Gortat [or Bass or Howard]

10

8

Wallace

20

8

Anderson [or Bass]

20

OTHERS

9

Robinson

DNP-CD

9

Williams

DNP-CD

10

Finley

1

10

Redick

1

11

Daniels

DNP-CD

11

Johnson

DNP-CD

12

Williams

DNP-CD

12

Bass

 

13

Scalabrine

 

 

 

 

 

Score

?

 

Score

?

which involves:

* Removing Matt Barnes [SF] from the starting line-up and replacing him with Mickael Pietrus [SF];

* Reducing significantly the minutes played by JJ Redick [OG] and Jason Williams [PG], while increasing the minutes played by Mickael Pietrus [SF];

* Using Vince Carter [OG] as the exclusive match-up vs Ray Allen [OG];

* Using Jameer Nelson [PG] as the exclusive match-up vs Rajon Rondo [PG];

* Having Vince Carter function as Orlando’s Back-up Point Guard, when Jameer Nelson … and, therefore, Rajon Rondo … is off the floor;

* Reducing significantly the minutes played by Rashard Lewis [PF];

* Using Rashard Lewis [PF] as the exclusive match-up vs Kevin Garnett [PF];

* Using either Brandon Bass [PF, or Marcin Gortat, PF/C] as the primary match-up [in addition to Dwight Howard, C] vs Glen Davis [PF]; and,

* Using Ryan Anderson [PF] as the exclusive match-up vs Rasheed Wallace [PF/C];

and would generate the respective Minutes Played [MP] indicated in the chart above for Game 3.

===========================

PS. BTW, those who would suggest that authentically “elite level coaching” makes almost no difference to the way that individual players perform, when it comes to determining “winners from losers,” in the NBA, simply do not understand what the game is all about at the highest levels of competition [e.g. The Celtics would not be leading this series, if Doc Rivers wasn't coaching their team]. 

Thus far, Stan Van Gundy is being out-coached by Doc Rivers

Wednesday, May 19th, 2010

Orlando is now down 0-2, heading to Boston for Game 3.

Q1. How come?

Game 1, Box Score

 

PLAYER USAGE, GAME 1

 

Orlando Magic

Boston Celtics

Pos

PLAYER

MP

Pos

PLAYER

MP

STARTERS

PG

OG

Rondo

R-Allen

46

40

PG

OG

Nelson

Carter

38

41

SF

Pierce

42

SF

Barnes

15

PF

C

Garnett

Perkins

34

26

PF

C

Lewis

Howard

42

39

KEY SUBS

G

T-Allen

17

PG

Williams

10

 

 

 

OG

Redick

19

SF

Pietrus

20

PF

Davis

15

 

 

?

?

C

Wallace

20

 

Gortat

14

RESERVES

PG

Robinson

DNP

PG

Johnson

DNP

G/F

G/F

Finley

Daniels

1

DNP

 

 

 

PF

Williams

DNP

PF

Bass

DNP

 

 

 

PF

Anderson

DNP

Game 2, Box Score

 

PLAYER USAGE, GAME 2

 

Orlando Magic

Boston Celtics

Pos

PLAYER

MP

Pos

PLAYER

MP

STARTERS

PG

OG

Rondo

R-Allen

45

39

PG

OG

Nelson

Carter

38

26

SF

Pierce

40

SF

Barnes

21

PF

C

Garnett

Perkins

35

15

PF

C

Lewis

Howard

41

40

KEY SUBS

G

T-Allen

15

PG

Williams

10

 

 

 

OG

Redick

34

SF

Pietrus

16

PF

Davis

28

 

 

?

?

C

Wallace

18

 

Gortat

15

RESERVES

PG

Robinson

DNP

PG

Johnson

DNP

G/F

G/F

Finley

Daniels

5

DNP

 

 

 

PF

Williams

DNP

PF

Bass

DNP

 

 

 

PF

Anderson

DNP

A1. Similar to what happened during Boston’s series vs Cleveland …

Thus far, Doc Rivers is significantly out-coaching his counterpart, in terms of how he is using his personnel to best advantage.

The choice going forward for Stan Van Gundy is actually quite simple:

OPTION 1
Keep doing exactly what the Magic have done to this point … and get swept, by losing 4 straight “close” games to an equally strong and championship calibre opponent;

or,

OPTION 2
Stop giving extended playing time to inferior players like Matt Barnes [SF] and JJ Redick [OG], over someone like Mickael Pietrus [G-F] - who is a much btter all-around player - and stop completely sitting out players like Brandon Bass [PF] and Ryan Anderson [PF], in favour of using only Dwight Howard [C], Rashard Lewis [PF] and Marcin Gortat [C/PF] - in an exclusively ”3 Bigs” rotation - when Boston is going with a “4 Bigs” rotation, involving Garnett [PF], Perkins [C], Davis [PF] and Wallace [C] … and, in the process, turn “close-but-no-cigar” losses into out-right W’s.

This is what the “individual Match-ups” have looked like to this point:

No.

Pos

Orlando Magic

vs

Pos

Boston Celtics

1

PG

Nelson/Williams

à

PG

Rondo

2

OG

Carter/Redick

ß

OG

R-Allen

3

SF

Barnes/Pietrus/Carter

à

SF

Pierce

4

PF

Lewis

=

PF

Garnett

5

C

Howard

ßß

C

Perkins

6

G

Redick

=

G

T-Allen

7

PF

Lewis

à

PF

Davis

8

PF/C

Gortat

à

PF/C

Wallace

9

 

 

=

G/F

Finley

10

PG

Johnson

=

PG

Robinson

11

PG

Bass

=

G/F

Daniels

12

PF/C

Anderson

=

PF/C

Williams/Scalabrine

13

HC

Van Gundy

à

HC

Rivers

 

 

+3

 

 

+5

If, however, SVG shifts to ”individual match-ups” which look like this, instead:

No.

Pos

Orlando Magic

vs

Pos

Boston Celtics

1

PG

Nelson

à

PG

Rondo

2

OG

Carter

ßß

OG

R-Allen

3

SF

Pietrus

à

SF

Pierce

4

PF

Lewis

=

PF

Garnett

5

C

Howard

ßß

C

Perkins

6

G

Barnes/Williams

=

G

T-Allen

7

PF

Bass/Gortat

=

PF

Davis

8

PF/C

Anderson

=

PF/C

Wallace

9

G/F

Redick

=

G/F

Finley

10

PG

Williams/Johnson

=

PG

Robinson

11

PG

Johnson/Barnes

=

G/F

Daniels

12

PF/C

Gortat/Bass

ß

PF/C

Williams/Scalabrine

13

HC

Van Gundy

=

HC

Rivers

 

 

+5

 

 

+2

then, Orlando would still have a have a solid chance to win this series in 7 games.

The choice is up to Stan.

Orlando will win Game 2, if …

Tuesday, May 18th, 2010

If you take a look at the way Doc Rivers and Stan Van Gundy chose to use their players in Game 1 of this series, it should be clear to see what Orlando needs to do this evening in order to head to Boston, for Game 3, tied 1-1:

 

PLAYER USAGE, GAME 1

 

Orlando Magic

Boston Celtics

Pos

PLAYER

MP

Pos

PLAYER

MP

STARTERS

PG

OG

Rondo

R-Allen

46

40

PG

OG

Nelson

Carter

38

41

SF

Pierce

42

SF

Barnes

15

PF

C

Garnett

Perkins

34

26

PF

C

Lewis

Howard

42

39

KEY SUBS

G

T-Allen

17

PG

Williams

10

 

 

 

OG

Redick

19

SF

Pietrus

20

PF

Davis

15

 

 

?

?

C

Wallace

20

 

Gortat

14

RESERVES

PG

Robinson

DNP

PG

Johnson

DNP

G/F

G/F

Finley

Daniels

1

DNP

 

 

 

PF

Williams

DNP

PF

Bass

DNP

 

 

 

PF

Anderson

DNP

BACK-UP GUARD
Although JJ Redick can do an adequate job, defensively, chasing Ray Allen around, using him for 19 minutes against a team like Boston - specifically, at the Off Guard position - significantly reduces Orlando’s overall effectiveness, when it comes to any “help & rotate”, “switch” or “rebounding” situation.

SMALL FORWARD
Matt Barnes, at the best of times, is ill-suited to match-up with an ultra-physical multi-dimensional player like Paul Pierce.

BIGS
Boston has decided to beat on - and beat up - Dwight Howard with a “4 Bigs” rotation of Kevin Garnett, Kendrick Perkins, Glen Davis and Rasheed Wallace. As long as SVG elects to only use a 3-man rotation of D-12, Rashard Lewis and Marcin Gortat, Orlando is going to come out on the short end of positional match-up.

Instead of following this recipe for disaster in Game 2, what Orlando needs to do instead is:

BACK-UP GUARD
Match up Vince Carter vs Ray Allen, almost exclusively; and, then use, either, Jason Williams or JJ Redick vs Tony Allen, but NOT both of them.

SMALL FORWARD
Insert Mickael Pietrus [6-6, 215] into their starting line-up, beside Vince Carter; and, match him up, almost exclusive, with Pierce [6-7, 235].

BIGS
Use D-12 [vs Perkins or Wallace], Rashard Lewis [vs Garnett or Wallace], Marcin Gortat [vs Perkins] and, either, Brandon Bass [vs Davis] or Ryan Anderson [vs Wallace], in a “4 Bigs” rotation.

If SVG and Co. make these adjustments tonight, then, the Magic should be able to even their series with the Celtics … AND cover the number [i.e. -7/-105], in the process.

Poor vs Good coaching was responsible for the Cavs’ loss in Game 5

Thursday, May 13th, 2010

Yesterday, elsewhere across the internet, the reason Cleveland lost to Boston in Game 5 was attributed to the failure of LeBron James to play as a NBA MVP should, when his team is playing at home against a worthy opponent.

This corner had a much different take, however, and placed the responsibility for this specific loss squarely on the shoulders of the Cavaliers’ head coach, Mike Brown, while giving due credit to his counterpart with the Celtics, Doc Rivers.

Q1. How come?

A1. If you take a closer look at the Substitution Chart [see below] for Game 5:

Time

Team

PG

OG

SF

PF

C

Start

End

Diff

2nd Q

Bos

Rondo

Allen-R

Allen-T

Davis

Wallace

21

21

-6

12:00

CLE

Williams

West

James

Varejao

Ilgauskas

23

29

+6

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

9:53

 

Time-out:

Regular

Boston

Bos 21

CLE 29

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bos

Allen-T

Allen-R

Pierce

Davis

Wallace

21

23

+2

9:53

CLE

 

 

 

 

 

29

29

-2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bos

 

 

 

 

 

23

23

0

9:06

CLE

Williams

West

Parker

Jamison

O’Neal

29

29

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bos

Allen-T

Allen-R

Pierce

Garnett

Perkins

23

26

+3

8:36

CLE

 

 

 

 

 

29

29

-3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bos

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7:10

CLE

Williams

Parker

James

Jamison

O’Neal

26

26

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

29

29

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7:10

 

Double

Techs

O’Neal

Perkins

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bos

Allen-T

Allen-R

Pierce

Davis

Garnett

26

37

+11

6:41

CLE

 

 

 

 

 

29

29

-11

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5:28

 

Time-out:

Official

 

Bos 30

CLE 29

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4:02

 

Time-out:

Regular

CLEVELAND

Bos 36

CLE 29

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bos

 

 

 

 

 

37

37

-3

4:02

CLE

Williams

Parker

James

Varejao

Ilgauskas

29

32

+3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bos

Rondo

Allen-R

Pierce

Davis

Garnett

37

42

-3

3:28

CLE

 

 

 

 

 

32

40

+3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1:49

 

Time-out:

Short

Boston

Bos 42

CLE 40

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bos

Rondo

Allen-R

Pierce

Garnett

Wallace

42

47

-4

1:49

CLE

 

 

 

 

 

40

41

+4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1:14

 

Time-out:

Short

CLEVELAND

Bos 44

CLE 40

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bos

 

 

 

Williams

Garnett

47

50

+3

0:43.2

CLE

West

Moon

James

Jamison

Ilgauskas

41

41

=3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bos

Rondo

Allen-R

Allen-T

Williams

Garnett

50

50

-3

0:17.5

CLE

Williams

West

James

Jamison

Ilgauskas

41

44

+3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bos

Rondo

Finley

Allen-T

Pierce

Garnett

50

50

0

0:08.6

CLE

Gibson

West

Moon

Jamison

Ilgauskas

44

44

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3rd Q

Bos

Rondo

Allen-R

Pierce

Garnett

Perkins

50

67

+9

12:00

CLE

Williams

Parker

James

Jamison

O’Neal

44

42

-9

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5:54

 

Time-out:

Short

CLEVELAND

Bos 67

CLE 52

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bos

 

 

 

 

 

67

68

-1

5:54

CLE

Gibson

Parker

James

Jamison

O’Neal

52

52

+1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bos

 

 

 

 

 

68

73

+2

5:30

CLE

Gibson

Parker

James

Jamison

Varejao

52

55

-2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bos

Rondo

Allen-R

Pierce

Davis

Perkins

73

73

0

3:47

CLE

 

 

 

 

 

55

55

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bos

 

 

 

 

 

73

78

0

3:10

CLE

Gibson

Parker

James

Varejao

Ilgauskas

55

60

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3:02

 

Time-out:

Regular

Boston

Bos 73

CLE 55

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bos

Rondo

Allen-T

Pierce

Davis

Wallace

78

80

-1

00:50.9

CLE

 

 

 

 

 

60

63

+1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bos

 

 

 

 

 

80

80

0

00:17.5

CLE

Gibson

Parker

Moon

Varejao

Ilgauskas

63

63

0

LEGEND: Diff – Points difference; Bold – Player substituted into game; Italics – Player shifted to a new position.

What you should be able to see is that:

1. The Cavs line-ups which included Shaquille O’Neal at Center during the 2nd and 3rd quarters were outscored by a whopping margin of -21 points.

2. At no time during this entire stretch did Mike Brown substitute JJ Hickson [PF] into the game and then use Anderson Varejao at the Center position.

3. During the key stretch of the 2nd quarter … from 6:41 to 4:02 … during which the Possession Outcome Chart looked like this:

Game

Poss

Team

Poss

 

Time

Boston

Celtics

Score

26-29

Team

Poss

 

Time

CLEVELAND

CAVALIERS

1

 

 

 

 

 

1

06:24

Jamison – TO

2

1

06:08

R-Allen – J3 [Orb/T]

 

 

 

 

 

3

2

06:07

Garnett – 2 of 2 FT

28

 

 

 

 

4

 

 

 

 

 

2

05:55

James – J3

5

3

05:45

Garnett – J2

30

 

 

 

 

6

 

 

 

 

 

3

05:28

Jamison – TO

7

4

05:09

Garnett – J2

32

 

 

 

 

8

 

 

 

 

 

4

04:42

Jamison – LU

9

5

04:34

R-Allen - D

34

 

 

 

 

10

 

 

 

 

 

5

04:04

Parker – TO

11

6

04:02

Pierce – LU + 1 FT

37

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6

04:02

Time-out: Regular

 

5-6

83%

 

 

 

0-6

0%

 

LEGEND: J2 – 2 point jump shot; J3 – 3 point jump shot; LU – Layup; DLU – Driving layup; D – Dunk; FT – Free throw; B/S – Blocked shot; TO – Turnover; OPF – Offensive personal foul; Orb – Offensive rebound; T – Team rebound.

Kevin Garnett [C] was a 1 man wrecking crew, while working beside Glen Davis [PF], against the front-court duo of Antawn Jamison [PF] and Shaquille O’Neal [C].

4. Mike Brown called his only time-out of the 3rd quarter after Boston had pushed its lead from 6 to 15 points, in the midst of a 17-8 run, at the start of the 2nd half … during which time he chose to make only 1 player substitution, i.e. replacing Williams with Gibson [at the PG spot], despite the Possession Outcome Chart for this quarter looking like what you see below:

Game

Poss

Team

Poss

 

Time

Boston

Celtics

Score

50-44

Team

Poss

 

Time

CLEVELAND

CAVALIERS

1

1

11:40

Garnett – J2 [Orb/RA]

 

 

 

 

 

2

2

11:27

R-Allen – J3

53

 

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

 

 

1

11:08

Williams – J2

4

3

10:59

Pierce – J2 [Orb/PP]

 

 

 

 

 

5

4

10:54

R-Allen – J3

56

 

 

 

 

6

 

 

 

 

46

2

10:29

O’Neal - D

7

5

10:15

Garnett – TO/OPF

 

 

 

 

 

8

 

 

 

 

 

3

09:57

James – TO/OPF

9

6

09:47

Rondo - DLU

58

 

 

 

 

10

 

 

 

 

 

4

09:31

James – J2

11

7

09:05

Garnett - LU

60

 

 

 

 

12

 

 

 

 

 

5

08:52

Jamison – J2 [B-S/KG]

13

8

08:29

Rondo – J2

62

 

 

 

 

14

 

 

 

 

 

6

08:14

James – J2

15

9

08:00

R-Allen – J3

 

 

 

 

 

16

 

 

 

 

48

7

07:48

O’Neal - D

17

10

07:27

Perkins – 2nd of 2 FT

63

 

 

 

 

18

 

 

 

 

50

8

07:10

O’Neal - D

19

11

06:55

Rondo - DLU

65

 

 

 

 

20

 

 

 

 

 

9

06:37

James – J3

21

12

06:21

Pierce – J3

 

 

 

 

 

22

 

 

 

 

52

10

06:15

James - D

23

13

05:57

Rondo - LU

67

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

05:54

Time-out: Regular

 

8-13

62%

 

 

 

4-10

40%

 

LEGEND: J2 – 2 point jump shot; J3 – 3 point jump shot; LU – Layup; DLU – Driving layup; D – Dunk; FT – Free throw; B/S – Blocked shot; TO – Turnover; OPF – Offensive personal foul; Orb – Offensive rebound.

with Ray Allen [6 pts] and Rajon Rondo [8 pts] both inflicting damage.

5. Mike Brown chose not to use either Jamario Moon [i.e. Cleveland's 2nd best defender/rebounder] or Delonte West [i.e. Cleveland's 3ed best offensive player] during the entire 3rd quarter, in an effort to regain control of the game’s momentum from the surging Celtics.

6. Mike Brown chose not to use the Cavs’ best possible defensive/rebounding/transition line-up:

i.e. James/PG + Parker/OG + Moon/SF + Hickson/PF + Varejao/C

at any point in the 3rd quarter.

7. Doc Rivers made the decision to make only 2 substitutions during the 3rd quarter:

i. 3:47, when Glen Davis replaced Kendrick Perkins;

and,

ii. 00:50.9, when Tony Allen and Rasheed Wallace replaced Ray Allen and Kevin Garnett, respectively;

and rode the new “BIG 4″ for almost the entire frame, in order to preserve the 18 point lead which the C’s had managed to create for themselves.

============================

By this point in his career, there should be NO DOUBT whatsoever that LeBron James is plenty good enough to win a basketball game for his team on his own … provided that he is “on” his game that specific day.

However, the fact is …

Even NBA superstars can [and, sometimes, do] have certain days when they just don’t have “IT”; and, when one of those happens in the playoffs, against a quality opponent, it is up to their head coach to save the situation, by out-thinking and out-executing his counterpart for the opposition.

Unfortunately for the Cavaliers, and their fans, this did not happen in Game 5.