Posts Tagged ‘Detroit Pistons’

Surprising summer roster move for the Pistons

Sunday, August 8th, 2010

Here’s something which is sure to set off palpitations at a plethora of sites with an interest in the Detroit Pistons … including, perhaps, herehere and here:

————————–

Sources: Pistons mulling Tracy McGrady

DraftExpress.com’s Jonathan Givony reported earlier Saturday that the Pistons have already committed to sign McGrady to a one-year deal at the league’s $1.35 million veteran minimum, but one source close to the situation told ESPN.com that Pistons officials were “taking the weekend” to discuss the move.

Another source said Saturday night that no deal has been signed but that the parties are “in discussions.”

Nearly two weeks after a high-profile audition with the Bulls at their practice facility, McGrady appeared to have lost all hope of landing with the team he badly wanted to join when Chicago struck an agreement Friday with veteran swingman Keith Bogans.

But the Pistons have unexpectedly emerged as a suitor for McGrady after a quiet summer for Detroit that has been attributed in some league circles to owner Karen Davidson’s reluctance to spend given her well-chronicled desire to sell the team.

Bringing in McGrady at such a low cost would thus represent a low-risk, high-reward gamble for the Pistons. The 31-year-old is trying to resurrect his career after playing in just 30 games last season with Houston Rockets and New York Knicks thanks to a slow recovery from microfracture knee surgery.

The Pistons would appear to have little need at shooting guard or small forward — with Richard Hamilton, Tayshaun Prince, Ben Gordon, Rodney Stuckey and the recently re-signed Will Bynum on the roster — but Detroit personnel chief Joe Dumars has never shied away from reclamation projects and knows his team suffered from a lack of scoring punch last season.

————————–

The only question is …

Will those palpitations reflect a genuine uptick in the level excitement for the team’s buoyed prospects next season, or be the precursor to a lethal heart attack.

Oh, my.

 

—————————-

Update:

Source: McGrady joining Pistons

End of NBA Regular Season, Quality Index Rankings, #1-30

Thursday, April 15th, 2010

At the conclusion of an 82 game schedule …

 

LEGITIMATE CONTENDERS TO WIN THE NBA CHAMPIONSHIP

[as of Thursday April 15, 2010]

 

TEAM

W

L

W%

EAST

WEST

PDR

PAR

RDR

QR

QIR

Cavaliers *

61

21

.744

1

 

2

5

1

8

1

Magic *

59

23

.720

2

 

1

4

4

9

2

Spurs *

50

32

.610

 

7

4

8

3

15

3

Jazz *

53

29

.646

 

5

3

12

5

20

4

Blazers *

50

32

.610

 

6

11

3

7

21

5

Lakers *

57

25

.695

 

1

6

9

7

22

6

Heat *

47

35

.573

5

 

13

2

11

26

T-7

Bobcats *

44

38

.537

7

 

15

1

10

26

T-7

Thunder *

50

32

.610

 

8

10

11

6

27

9

Hawks *

53

29

.646

3

 

6

9

16

31

10

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bucks *

46

36

.561

6

 

14

7

17

38

11

Celtics *

50

32

.610

4

 

9

5

25

39

12

Bulls *

41

41

.500

8

 

18

13

9

40

13

Grizzlies

40

42

.488

 

 

17

24

2

43

14

Suns *

54

28

.659

 

3

5

26

13

44

15

Nuggets *

53

29

.646

 

4

8

20

22

50

16

Mavericks *

55

27

.671

 

2

12

15

24

51

17

Pistons

27

55

.329

 

 

27

13

12

52

18

Rockets

42

40

.512

 

 

16

21

21

58

19

76ers

27

55

.329

 

 

24

18

18

60

T-20

Clippers

29

53

.354

 

 

28

19

13

60

T-20

Wizards

26

56

.317

 

 

26

16

19

61

22

Kings

25

57

.305

 

 

25

25

15

65

23

Hornets

37

45

.451

 

 

20

21

26

67

24

Raptors

40

42

.488

9

 

19

27

22

68

25

Pacers

32

50

.390

 

 

21

23

29

73

T-26

Nets

12

70

.146

 

 

29

17

27

73

T-26

Knicks

29

53

.354

 

 

23

27

28

78

T-28

Timberwolves

15

67

.183

 

 

30

29

19

78

T-28

Warriors

26

56

.317

 

 

22

30

30

82

30

LEGEND: W – Wins; L - Losses; Win% - Winning Percentage; PDR – Points Differential Ranking; PAR – Points Allowed Ranking; RDR – Rebounding Differential Ranking; QR – Quality Rating [i.e. PDR + PAR + RDR = QR]; QIR – Quality Index Ranking [i.e. QR/#1-30]; * - Clinched playoff position.

there are now 10 teams left with a legitimate opportunity to win this year’s league championship … none of which are the Mavericks [W2], Suns [W3], Nuggets [W4], Celtics [E4], Bucks [E6] or Bulls [E8], according to the recent history of the NBA.

Related:

What it takes to win the NBA Championship

Villanueva, Wallace and Kuester gift wrap crucial W for Raptors

Tuesday, April 13th, 2010

Toronto Raptors [39-42] 111
DETROIT PISTONS [27-55] 97
Complete Game Info

PART 1 - The Twitter Effect

As soon as you read Charlie Villanueva’s tweet from yesterday afternoon …

———————————

Pistons’ Charlie Villanueva guarantees win against Raptors

“Guarantee win tonight, yeah I said it,” is a tweet that appeared on Villanueva’s account about 2:35 p.m. today.

———————————

you just knew that the Raptors would be good to go into Detroit last night and pummel the Pistons.

PART 2 - The Big Ben Effect

Although Ben Wallace/C has had a decent year, defensively, in his return to Detroit, it was rather comical to see the combinations of:

i. He and Jonas Jerebko
[-9 vs Bargnani/Johnson; +2 vs Bargnani/Turkoglu], or

ii. He and Charlie Villanueva
[-4 vs Bargnani/Johnson; -1 vs Bargnani/Turkoglu], or

iii. He and Tayshaun Prince
[-6 vs Bargnani/Johnson], or

iv. He and Jason Maxiell
[-6 vs Bargnani/Johnson]

PLUS/MINUS STATS FOR THE PAIRS OF CENTERS AND POWER FORWARDS

#

C
PF

Bargnani

Johnson

Bargnani

Turkoglu

Bargnani

Evans

Bargnani

Weems

Bargnani
Nesterovic

Johnson
Turkoglu

 

 

S#

Dur

+/-

S#

Dur

+/-

S#

Dur

+/-

S#

Dur

+/-

S#

Dur

+/-

S#

Dur

+/-

1

Wallace

Jerebko

1

03:26

+1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2

00:14

+2

3

00:29

-2

 

 

 

4

01:45

-4

 

 

 

5

01:28

-4

 

 

 

TOT

07:08

-9

TOT

00:14

+2

2

Wallace

Villanueva

1

02:40

-4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2

01:46

-1

TOT

02:40

-4

TOT

01:46

-1

3

Wallace

Prince

1

02:33

-6

 

 

 

 

 

TOT

02:33

-6

4

Wallace

Maxiell

1

03:48

-6

 

 

 

 

 

TOT

03:48

-6

5

Maxiell

Villanueva

 

 

 

1

02:46

+4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2

01:17

-2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3

00:20

+4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4

01:11

+1

5

00:28

+2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6

01:06

+4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7

02:02

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8

00:14

-3

 

 

 

 

 

 

9

00:50

+3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10

01:23

+5

 

 

 

 

 

 

11

00:55

+1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

12

01:01

-3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

13

01:27

-1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

14

00:16

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

TOT

01:18

+5

TOT

06:49

+9

TOT

02:44

-4

TOT

00:14

-3

TOT

01:23

+5

TOT

02:48

+3

6

Maxiell

Jerebko

 

 

 

 

1

01:54

+7

 

 

 

2

00:54

-4

 

 

 

TOT

00:54

-4

TOT

01:54

+7

7

Maxiell

Prince

1

01:01

-2

 

 

 

 

 

TOT

01:01

-2

LEGEND: C – Center; PF – Power Forward; S# - Shift number; Dur – Duration of shift; +/- - Plus/Minus total for shift; TOT – Totals.

attempt to guard a perimeter oriented C like Andrea Bargnani … who was shooting the ball well last night … and an energetic under-sized PF like Amir Johnson.

PART 3 - The John Kuester Effect

At the 10:14 mark of the 2nd quarter, with the Raptors leading by 3 points [28-31], Pistons’ head coach, John Kuester:

i. Replaced Ben Gordon/OG with Will Bynum/PG;
ii. Shifted Rodney Stuckey/PG to the OG position; and,
iii. Replaced Charlie Villanueva/PF with Jonas Jerebko/PF-SF;

while keeping Austin Daye/SF and Ben Wallace/C on the floor, against Toronto’s 5-man unit of:

Jarrett Jack, PG
Marco Belinelli, OG
DeMar DeRozan, SF
Hedo Turkoglu, PF and
Andrea Bargnani, C

Jay Triano did not respond with a substitution which created the following individual defensive match-ups for Detroit:

Bynum vs Jack
Stuckey vs Belinelli
Daye vs DeRozan
Jerebko vs Turkoglu, and
Wallace vs Bargnani.

This shift of 14 seconds produced a +2 gain for the Pistons.

At the 10:00 mark, however, Raptors’ head coach, Jay Triano, replaced Hedo Turkoglu/SF-PF with Amir Johnson/PF.

John Kuester did not respond with a substitution for the Pistons which created the following individual defensive match-ups for Detroit:

Bynum vs Jack
Stuckey vs Belinelli
Daye vs DeRozan
Jerebko vs Johnson, and
Wallace vs Bargnani.

This shift of 29 seconds produced a -2 loss for the Pistons.

At the 9:31 mark, Jay Triano replaced DeMar DeRozan/SF-OG with Sonny Weems.

John Kuester did not respond with a substitution for the Pistons which created the following individual defensive match-ups for Detroit:

Bynum vs Jack
Stuckey vs Belinelli
Daye vs Weems
Jerebko vs Johnson, and
Wallace vs Bargnani.

This shift of 1:44 produced a -4 loss for the Pistons … and was halted, temporarily, by an official’s time-out, with Detroit trailing by 7 points [32-39]. 

Coming out from this time-out, John Kuester responded by replacing Jonas Jerebko/PF-SF with Tayshaun Prince/SF.

Jay Triano did not respond with a substitution for the Raptors which created the following individual defensive match-ups for Detroit:

Bynum vs Jack
Stuckey vs Belinelli
Daye vs Weems
Prince vs Johnson, and
Wallace vs Bargnani.

This shift of 2:33 produced a -6 loss for the Pistons … and was halted by a regular time-out, called by Detroit, with Toronto leading by 13 points [34-47].

Coming out from this time-out, John Kuester:

i. Replaced Austin Daye with Ben Gordon/OG-PG;
ii. Shifted Rodney Stuckey/PG-OG to the Small Forward position; and,
iii. Replaced Ben Wallace/C with Jason Maxiell/PF;

while keeping Will Bynum and Tayshaun Prince on the floor, as the PG and PF, respectively.

Jay Triano did not respond with a substitution for the Raptors which created the following individual defensive match-ups for Detroit:

Bynum vs Jack
Gordon vs Belinelli
Stuckey vs Weems
Prince vs Johnson, and
Maxiell vs Bargnani.

This shift of 1:01 produced a -2 loss for the Pistons.

At the 4:13 mark, John Kuester:

i. Replaced Rodney Stuckey with Charlie Villanueva; and,
ii. Moved Tayshaun Prince back to the SF position.

Jay Triano did not respond with a substitution for the Raptors which created the following individual defensive match-ups for Detroit:

Bynum vs Jack
Gordon vs Belinelli
Prince vs Weems
Maxiell vs Johnson, and
Villanueva vs Bargnani.

This shift of 28 seconds produced a +2 gain for the Pistons … and, finally, stopped the Raptors’ run, with Detroit trailing by 13 points [36-49].

This is the type of poor personnel use …

[for example]

a. Having Ben Wallace attempt to check Andrea Bargnani
b. Playing Will Bynum and Rodney Stuckey together;
c. Playing Will Bynum, Ben Gordon and Rodney Stuckey together;
d. Playing Tayshaun Prince at PF with Ben Wallace/C; and,
e. Failing to have Villanueva check Bargnani;

by John Kuester which has been responsibile for the bulk of the Pistons’ internal problems this season.

———————————–

If the Raptors could just play a steady diet of opponents the same quality as this year’s Pistons … re: coaches and players … then they would have been able to qualify for the playoffs a long time ago.

Legitimate contenders in the NBA, as of April 5

Tuesday, April 6th, 2010

With a little more than 1 week left in the regular season schedule …

 

LEGITIMATE CONTENDERS TO WIN THE NBA CHAMPIONSHIP

[as of Monday April 5, 2010]

 

TEAM

W

L

W%

EAST

WEST

PDR

PAR

RDR

QR

QIR

Cavaliers *

60

17

.779

1

 

1

5

2

8

1

Magic *

54

23

.701

2

 

2

4

4

10

2

Spurs *

47

29

.618

 

7

4

7

4

15

3

Jazz *

50

27

.649

 

4

3

12

6

21

T-4

Lakers *

55

22

.714

 

1

5

9

7

21

T-4

Blazers *

47

30

.610

 

8

11

3

8

22

6

Thunder *

48

28

.623

 

6

10

10

3

23

7

Heat

43

34

.558

5

 

12

2

10

24

8

Bobcats

40

36

.528

7

 

15

1

11

31

9

Hawks *

49

27

.645

3

 

6

10

18

34

10

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bucks

42

34

.553

6

 

14

8

17

39

11

Celtics *

48

28

.632

4

 

9

6

25

40

T-12

Grizzlies

39

37

.513

 

 

16

23

1

40

T-12

Bulls

37

39

.487

9

 

19

14

9

42

14

Nuggets *

50

27

.649

 

3

8

20

20

48

15

Suns *

50

27

.649

 

5

7

28

14

49

16

Mavericks *

50

27

.649

 

2

13

15

24

52

T-17

Pistons

23

53

.303

 

 

27

13

12

52

T-17

76ers

26

50

.342

 

 

24

17

16

57

19

Rockets

38

38

.500

 

 

17

21

22

60

T-20

Clippers

27

50

.351

 

 

28

19

13

60

T-20

Kings

24

53

.312

 

 

25

25

15

65

T-22

Wizards

23

53

.303

 

 

26

16

23

65

T-22

Raptors

38

38

.500

8

 

18

27

21

66

24

Hornets

35

43

.449

 

 

20

22

26

68

25

Pacers

29

48

.377

 

 

21

24

28

73

T-26

Nets

11

66

.143

 

 

29

17

27

73

T-26

Knicks

27

49

.355

 

 

22

26

29

77

28

Timberwolves

15

62

.195

 

 

30

29

19

78

29

Warriors

23

53

.303

 

 

23

30

30

83

30

LEGEND: W – Wins; L - Losses; Win% - Winning Percentage; PDR – Points Differential Ranking; PAR – Points Allowed Ranking; RDR – Rebounding Differential Ranking; QR – Quality Rating [i.e. PDR + PAR + RDR = QR]; QIR – Quality Index Ranking [i.e. QR/#1-30]; * - Clinched playoff position.

there are 10 teams with a legitimate opportunity to win this year’s league championship … none of which are the Mavericks, Nuggets, Suns, Celtics, Bucks, Raptors or Bulls.

Related:

What it takes to win the NBA Championship

Curing what ails the 2009-2010 Detroit Pistons

Friday, March 5th, 2010

After losing their last 2 games against the Boston Celtics and the New York Kincks, it will be very interesting to see how the Detroit Pistons respond this evening, when they journey to Cleveland to take on the team with the top W-L record in the NBA.

While many Pistons fans are lamenting the atrocious state of their squad which was sitting at the top end of the Eastern Conference just 2 seasons ago … this corner of the blogosphere does not share a similar level of doom and gloom concerning the goings-on in the Motor City over the last 12 months.

If the Pistons’ everyday rotation/line-up was to look like this:

STARTERS
1. PG, Stuckey [32 MPG, best multi-dimensional PG with good size]
2. OG, Hamilton [32 MPG, best offensive Wing scorer with good size]
3. SF, Prince [30 MPG, best defensive/rebounding Wing player]
4. PF, Maxiell [26 MPG, best rebounding front-court player]
5. C, Brown [22 MPG, best interior defensive/rebounding player]

KEY SUBS
6. PG-OG, Gordon [32 MPG, best combination Guard with solid perimeter J]
7. SF, Jerebko [18 MPG, best defensive/rebounding back-up Wing]
8. PF, Villanueva [22 MPG, best perimeter-oriented scoring Big]
9. C, Wallace [28 MPG, best interior defensive/rebounding Big]

RESERVES
10. OG-SF, Daye [injury replacement minutes which would be a lot this yr]
11. SF-PF, Summers [injury replacement minutes which would be a lot this yr]

EXTRAS
12. PG, Atkins [DNP-CD]

OUTS [who should be package with another asset in exchange for an inside scoring Big]
13. PG, Bynum [amongst the very best back-up PG's in the NBA]
14. PF-C, Wilcox

what Detroit would find is that:

- the rhythm for their 3 principal Guards [i.e. Hamilton, Stuckey and Gordon] would be much improved
- the quality of their PG play overall would be more consistent [i.e. with Stuckey and Gordon, exclusively, running this team]
- their overall level of “Team Cohesion” would improve significantly
- their interior defense would be improved
- their Guard oriented Team Scoring output would be much improved

ROSTER COMPARISON FOR DETROIT AND CLEVELAND

Pos

PISTONS

RATING

Pos

CAVALIERS

RATING

COACH

 

Kuester

1

 

Brown

3

SUB-TOTAL

1

SUB-TOTAL

3

STARTERS

PG

Stuckey

3

PG

Williams-M

3

OG

Hamilton

4

OG

Parker

3

SF

Prince

4

SF

James

5

PF

Maxiell

3

PF

Jamison

4

C

Brown

3

PF-C

Hickson

3

SUB-TOTAL

17

SUB-TOTAL

18

KEY SUBS

PG-OG

Gordon

4

PG-OG

West

4

SF

Jerebko

3

OG-SF

Moon

3

PF

Villanueva

3

PF

Powe *

3

C

Wilcox *

3

PF-C

Varejao

4

SUB-TOTAL

13

SUB-TOTAL

14

RESERVES

PG

Atkins

2

PG

Gibson

3

OG-SF

Daye

3

SF

Williams-J

3

SF-PF

Summers

2

PF

Jackson

2

SUB-TOTAL

7

SUB-TOTAL

8

TOTAL

38

TOTAL

43

EXTRAS/OUTS

PG

Bynum #

4

OG-SF

Green

3

PF-C

Wallace

Injured

C

O’Neal

Injured

LEGEND: RATING – From 5 [highest] to 1 [lowest]; Pos – Position; * - Replacement for injured player; # - Valuable player who should be traded in a package with another asset, in exchange for an interior scoring Big.  

Contrary to popular belief, this year’s Pistons team actually has a good deal of solid NBA talent that is simply not being used properly by their head coach.

———————————–

PS. Just because Daye [i.e. talented OG-SF scorer] and Summers [i.e. talented PF-SF defender/rebounder] haven’t been given the opportunity to play a whole lot of minutes yet this season, Pistons fans should not make the mistake of thinking that either player has a lower long term ceiling than Jonas Jerebko, who has shown great promise thus far in the limited [but increasing] minutes he has received. Pistons fans were told in the summer that the player they were getting in Jerebko has REAL ability to become a solid contributor to a high end team in the NBA, as his career continues to develop. Few chose to believe what they were told at the time. Time has proven, once again, that they were wrong, and that what was said by yours truly was highly accurate. Well, the exact same thing also applies to Daye and Summers. As the next 2 years continue to unfold, what astute Pistons fans should begin to see more and more is that both of these young men have the capacity to develop into frontline contributors for Detroit, down-the-road a piece … provided that each one is eventually used properly by the team’s head coach who, unfortunately, should be someone other than John Kuester. Until Joe Dumars fixes his problem, in this regard, and identifies a proven high end NBA head coach [e.g. Jeff Van Gundy] who can lead his team properly, the abundant talent on this team is merely going to waste.

Specific reasons why the Pistons lost another winnable game

Thursday, March 4th, 2010

As a follow-up to yesterday’s take on the sorry state of the once-proud Detroit Pistons …

Detroit Pistons 104 [21-40]
NEW YORK KNICKS 128 [21-39]

Complete Game Info

———————————————

Coming off a tough loss on Tuesday night, at home against the Boston Celtics, Detroit played New York fairly even for the first 32 minutes of last night’s match-up at Madison Square Garden, and trailed by only 5 points at the 4:02 mark of the 3rd quarter, when John Kuester made the decision to replace Rodney Stuckey/PG with Will Bynum:

 

PLAYER SUBSTITUTION CHART

 

TIME

TEAM

PG

OG

SF

PF

C

Start

End

Diff

3rd Quarter

04:02

DET

Bynum

Gordon

Prince

Jerebko

Maxiell

73

76

0

 

NYK

McGrady

House

Gallinari

Harrington

Lee

80

83

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

02:56

DET

Bynum

Gordon

Prince

Jerebko

Maxiell

76

85

-2

 

NYK

Rodriguez

House

Walker

Gallinari

Lee

83

94

+2

4th Quarter

12:00

DET

Bynum

Gordon

Hamilton

Jerebko

Villanueva

85

91

-1

 

NYK

Rodriguez

House

Walker

Gallinari

Lee

94

101

+1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

08:49

DET

Bynum

Gordon

Hamilton

Jerebko

Villanueva

91

93

-11

 

NYK

McGrady

House

Walker

Harrington

Lee

101

114

+11

LEGEND: Red ShadeNew York player substitution; Blue ShadeDetroit player substitution; Orange ShadeNew York player shifted to a new position.

What others should be able to glean from the Pistons’ performance last night … throughout the contest and, specifically, at crunch time … is that WHEN their coach, John Kuester, chooses to:

1. Use Will Bynum [23 MP] as the primary Back-up to Rodney Stuckey [26 MP], at the PG position, instead of Ben Gordon [OG-PG, 23 MP];

2. Use Rip Hamilton [33 MP] at the SF position, from time to time, in a “going small” 5-man unit, rather than exclusively at the OG position;

3. Use Ben Gordon as the primary Back-up to Rip Hamilton, at the OG position, usually in conjunction with Will Bynum/PG, giving the Pistons one of the “smallest” and least effective guard combinations in the league when it comes to defense and rebounding;

4. Use Jason Maxiell [30 MP] as his Starting Center, rather than Kwame Brown [3 MP in garbage time] … while operating beside Stuckey, Hamilton, Prince [33 MP] and Jerebko [33 MP];

5. Use Jonas Jerebko as his Starting PF, rather than starting Jason Maxiell at that position and then bringing Charlie Villanueva [15 MP] off the bench as his primary Back-up;

6. Use Charlie Villanueva as his Back-up Center, rather than starting Kwame Brown at that position and then bringing Chris Wilcox [DNP-CD] off the bench as his primary Back-up;

7. Not use Austin Daye for more than 10 minutes, as a secondary Back-up at the OG & SF positions, in a game where he was the only member of the Pistons who generated a “positive” plus/minus number [i.e. +6], while shooting 43% from the floor, shooting 100% from the FT Line, with 3 Rebs, a positive Ast:TO and 1 St;

and,

8. Not use DeJaun Summers [6-8, 240] for more than 3 minutes, as a secondary Back-up at the SF & PF positions, in a game where their opponent chose to start [and give critical amounts of PT to] a “going big” 5-Man Unit that looked like this:

Option 1

PG, T-Mac [6-8, 223]
OG, Bill Walker [6-6, 230]
SF, Danilo Gallinari [6-10, 225]
PF, Al Harrington [6-9, 250]
C, David Lee [6-9, 250]

Option 2

PG, T-Mac [6-8, 223]
OG, Eddie House [6-1, 180] 
SF, Bill Walker [6-6, 230]
PF, Al Harrington [6-9, 250]
C, David Lee [6-9, 250];

then, the Pistons are unable to compete successfully on Offense, Defense and in terms of Rebounding.

While others in the on-line hoops community are certainly free to assign blame to whomever they think is most responsible for the current mess in Detroit, as far as these eyes are concerned, the Pistons’ main problem this season is rooted in the poor decision-making of their head coach, John Kuester … i.e. in terms of how he is choosing to use his personnel … which has consistently resulted in awful performances similar to last night’s atrocious display in the 4th quarter.

—————————

PS. Those who have followed this blog for the better part of the last 2 years should be able to readily attest that a simple observation of:

“What Team X needs to do in order to turn around their fortunes is fire their head coach,” 

is not the usual reaction from yours truly. In this case, however, there’s a good deal of solid “NBA level talent” that is simply going to waste in Detroit.

Pistons’ main problem this year is their head coach

Wednesday, March 3rd, 2010

For those who watched last night’s Pistons-Celtics game,

Boston Celtics 105
DETROIT PISTONS 100

Complete Game Info

you saw all the evidence you need to realize that Detroit actually has a good deal of solid “NBA talent” on its current roster that is simply under-acheiving this season under the direction of John Kuester.

For example …

- using Rip Hamilton as a SF is a mistake

- using Will Bynum as a primary back-up PG to Rodney Stuckey is a mistake … when you also have Ben Gordon/OG-PG and Rip Hamilton [OG] on your squad, since there are simply not enough minutes available at the OG position, exclusively, for both Rip and BG to develop their rhythm properly in a given game

- using Ben Wallace as their starting C is a mistake … as opposed to using Kwame Brown in this lead “supporting” role and then shifting BW to the role of his primary back-up

- using Austin Daye [being wasted, thus far], Jonas Jerebko [just beginning to be used] and DeJuan Summers [being wasted, thus far] properly this season, should be a priority for the Pistons, as each one of these players has the capacity to develop into a front-line performer for Detroit … which is simply not happening this year under Coach Kuester

- signing offensive players like Charlie Villanueva and Ben Gordon and then NOT using them correctly, by actually running specific set plays designed to get them high percentage shots on a consistent basis, is a mistake … and certainly not what Joe D had in mind when he made those two roster moves this past summer

Those who think that the following list of players, used in the following way:

STARTERS
Stuckey/PG, Hamilton/OG, Prince/SF, Maxiell/PF and Brown/C

KEY SUBS
Gordon/OG-PG, Jerebko/SF-PF, Villanueva/PF-SF and Wallace/C

RESERVES
Daye/OG-SF and Summers/SF-PF

EXTRAS/OUTS
Atkins/PG, Bynum/PG [who should be traded in a package deal for a front-line multi-purpose Big] and Wilcox/PF-C

does not contain “enough” NBA talent to be a top 6 team in the Eastern Conference this season, and beyond, do not possess a high degree of basketball acumen.

Despite the injuries which the Pistons have faced this season, this group of players, if used properly, has more than enough NBA talent to be in the thick of the battle for the #5-8 playoff spots in the east …

Evaluating The NBA Talent Level

of Legitimate Playoff Contenders

in the Eastern Conference

Pos

TORONTO

31-28/.525

5TH

RK

CHICAGO

31-29/.517

6TH

RK

MILWAUKEE

30-29/.508

7TH

RK

MIAMI

29-31/.483

8TH

RK

CHARLOTTE

28-30/.483

9TH

RK

DETROIT

21-39/.350

12TH

RK

 

COACH

 

 

Triano

5

Del Negro

4

Skiles

2

Spoelstra

3

Brown

1

Kuester

6

SUB-TOTAL

5

 

4

 

2

 

3

 

1

 

6

 

STARTERS

 

PG

Jack

3

Rose

1

Jennings

5

Alston

6

Felton

4

Stuckey

2

OG

DeRozan

6

Hinrich

4

Delfino

5

Wade

1

Jackson

2

Hamilton

3

SF

Turkoglu

4

Deng

3

Salmons

5

Richardson

6

Wallace

1

Prince

2

PF

Bosh

1

Gibson

6

LRMAM

3

Beasley

5

Diaw

2

Maxiell

4

C

Bargnani

3

Noah

2

Bogut

1

O’Neal

4

Chandler

6

Brown

5

SUB-TOTAL

17

 

16

 

19

 

22

 

15

 

16

 

KEY SUBS

 

PG

Calderon

1

Brown

5

Ridnour

6

Chalmers

4

Augustin

3

Gordon

2

OG

Weems

4

Murray

1

Bell

2

Cook

5

Graham

6

Daye

3

SF

Wright

5

Johnson

6

Stackhouse

1

Wright

2

Brown

4

Jerebko

3

PF

Johnson

6

Warrick

5

Ilyasova

4

Haslem

1

Thomas

2

Villanueva

3

C

Nesterovic

5

Miller

1

Thomas

4

Anthony

6

Mohammed

2

Wallace

3

SUB-TOTAL

21

 

18

 

17

 

18

 

17

 

14

 

RESERVES

 

G

Belinelli

3

Law

5

Ivey

6

Arroyo

2

Henderson

4

Bynum

1

F/C

Evans

3

James

6

Gadzuric

4

Magloire

2

Diop

1

Summers

5

SUB-TOTAL

6

 

11

 

10

 

4

 

5

 

6

TOTAL

49

 

49

 

48

 

47

 

38

 

42

 

EXTRAS/OUT

 

 

Banks

5

Pargo

3

Redd

1

Jones

2

Ratliff

4

Atkins

 

 

O’Bryant

4

Hunter

1

Brezec

2

Diawara

3

Ajinca

5

Wilcox

 

 

 

 

Alexander

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LEGEND: Pos – Position; RK – Ranking.

and, the only reason Detroit is now on the outside looking in is because of their head coach, John Kuester.

i.e. re: Legitimate Contenders to Win the NBA Championship, The Pistons are No. 9 in Rebounding Differential and No. 10 in Points Allowed. The fact that they are also No. 25 in Points Scored Differential is primarily attributable to the relatively poor work of their coach, at the offensive end of the floor, based on how he has decided to use their personnel, thus far.

Coming down the home stretch, Legitimate Contenders for the 2009-2010 NBA Championship

Monday, March 1st, 2010

Every year since the 2000-2001 season, each of the two teams which have reached the NBA Finals (i.e. the Champion and the Finalist) have also finished the regular season schedule with a Quality Rating (QR) of 34, or better, and a Quality Index Rank (QIR) of #11 or better (when compared to all playoff teams that year) … i.e. What it takes to win the NBA Championship.

If the NBA Playoffs were to start today, this is what the list of legitimate contenders to win the championship actually looks like:

LEGITIMATE CONTENDERS TO WIN THE NBA CHAMPIONSHIP

[as of Sun Feb 28 2010]

TEAM

W-L REC

WIN %

PDR

PAR

RDR

QR

QIR

ECPT-QIR

WCPT-QIR

Cavaliers

46-14

.767

1

5

1

7

1

1

 

Magic

40-20

.667

3

6

5

14

2

2

 

Lakers

45-15

.750

2

8

5

15

3

 

3

Spurs

33-24

.579

8

9

3

20

4

 

4

Thunder

35-23

.603

9

7

5

21

5

 

5

Jazz

38-21

.644

4

13

5

22

6

 

6

Blazers

35-27

.565

11

4

10

25

7

 

7

Bobcats

28-29

.491

14

2

12

28

8

8

 

Heat

29-31

.483

14

3

12

29

9

 

 

Celtics

36-21

.632

6

1

23

30

10

9

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bulls

31-28

.525

19

14

4

37

11

10

 

Bucks

30-29

.508

13

11

14

38

12

11

 

Hawks

37-21

.638

6

12

24

42

13

12

 

Grizzlies

30-29

.508

18

23

2

43

14

 

 

Pistons

21-38

.356

25

10

9

44

15

 

 

Mavericks

39-21

.650

12

15

18

45

16

 

13

Nuggets

39-20

.661

5

22

22

49

17

 

14

76ers

22-36

.379

21

17

14

52

T-18

 

 

Clippers

24-35

.407

25

16

11

52

T-18

 

 

Rockets

29-29

.500

16

21

18

55

T-20

 

 

Hornets

31-29

.517

20

19

26

55

T-20

 

 

Suns

37-24

.607

10

29

20

59

22

 

15

Wizards

21-36

.368

23

20

20

63

23

 

 

Knicks

20-38

.345

22

25

29

66

24

 

 

Raptors

31-27

.534

17

26

24

67

25

16

 

Kings

20-39

.339

25

27

16

68

26

 

 

Timberwolves

14-47

.230

29

28

17

74

27

 

 

Nets

6-53

.102

30

18

27

75

28

 

 

Pacers

20-39

.339

28

24

28

80

29

 

 

Warriors

17-41

.293

24

30

30

84

30

 

 

LEGEND: W-L REC – Won-Loss Record; WIN % - Winning Percentage; PDR – Points Differential Ranking; PAR – Points Allowed Ranking; RDR – Rebounding Differential Ranking; QR – Quality Rating [i.e. PDR + PAR + RDR]; QIR – Quality Index Ranking [i.e. No. 1-30]; ECPT-QIR – Eastern Conference Playoff Teams Quality Index Ranking; WCPT-QIR – Western Conference Playoff Team Quality Index Ranking; Blue Shade – Eastern Conference Playoff Teams; Red Shade – Western Conference Playoff Teams.

There are only 9 teams in the hunt with a little more than 1 month’s worth of games left to be played.

4 in the Eastern Conference:

Cleveland Cavaliers [#1]
Orlando Magic [#2]
Charlotte Bobcats [#8], and
Boston Celtics [#9];

and,

5 in the Western Conference:

Los Angeles Lakers [#3]
San Antonio Spurs [#4]
Oklahoma City Thunder [#5]
Utah Jazz [#6], and
Portland Trail Blazers [#7].

Most Efficient Teams in the NBA, Pre All-Star Break

Tuesday, February 23rd, 2010

When the numbers are crunched … 

NBA 2009-2010

PRE ALL-STAR BREAK

TEAM EFFECTIVENESS RANKINGS

[as of Thu Feb 11 2010]

TEAM

W-L REC

WIN %

PDR

PAR

RDR

QR

QIR

OFF

POSS/G

DEF

POSS/G

O-PPP

O-PPP

RK

D-PPP

D-

PPP

RK

PPP

DIFF

PPP

DIFF

RK

CAVALIERS 1

43-11

0.796

1

2

1

4

1

103

104

0.99

T-2

0.91

T-5

0.08

1

CELTICS 4

32-18

0.640

5

1

23

29

9

103

105

0.96

T-7

0.89

T-1

0.07

2

MAGIC 2

36-18

0.667

3

7

5

15

2

104

106

0.97

T-5

0.91

T-5

0.06

T-3

LAKERS 1

41-13

0.759

2

9

7

18

T-4

109

108

0.95

T-12

0.89

T-1

0.06

T-3

JAZZ 3

32-19

0.627

6

12

9

27

T-7

106

106

0.97

T-5

0.92

T-8

0.05

T-5

NUGGETS 2

35-18

0.660

4

22

18

44

T-13

109

109

0.98

4

0.93

T-12

0.05

T-5

SPURS 5

30-21

0.588

6

8

3

17

3

105

104

0.96

T-7

0.92

T-8

0.04

T-7

SUNS 7

31-22

0.585

10

29

25

64

T-22

110

112

1.00

1

0.96

T-23

0.04

T-7

THUNDER 6

30-21

0.588

9

5

4

18

T-4

107

107

0.92

T-18

0.89

T-1

0.03

T-9

HAWKS 3

33-18

0.647

8

11

20

39

11

105

105

0.96

T-7

0.93

T-12

0.03

T-9

MAVERICKS 4

32-20

0.615

12

15

20

47

T-16

105

107

0.96

T-7

0.93

T-12

0.03

T-9

BLAZERS 8

31-24

0.564

11

4

6

21

6

102

101

0.96

T-7

0.94

T-16

0.02

T-12

HEAT 7

26-27

0.491

13

6

15

34

10

103

104

0.94

T-15

0.92

T-8

0.02

T-12

RAPTORS 5

29-23

0.558

17

26

24

67

25

106

108

0.99

T-2

0.97

T-29

0.02

T-12

BOBCATS 6

26-25

0.510

13

2

12

27

T-7

105

104

0.91

T-22

0.91

T-5

0.00

T-15

HORNETS

28-25

0.528

19

19

26

64

T-22

106

107

0.95

T-12

0.95

T-19

0.00

T-15

KNICKS

19-32

0.373

21

24

27

72

27

108

109

0.94

T-15

0.95

T-19

-0.01

T-17

WARRIORS

13-40

0.245

24

30

30

84

30

113

116

0.95

T-12

0.96

T-23

-0.01

T-17

BULLS 8

25-26

0.490

22

14

8

44

T-13

109

108

0.88

T-27

0.90

4

-0.02

T-19

BUCKS

24-27

0.471

15

13

18

46

15

109

106

0.90

T-24

0.92

T-8

-0.02

T-19

ROCKETS

27-24

0.529

16

18

16

50

19

110

107

0.92

T-18

0.94

T-16

-0.02

T-19

PACERS

18-34

0.346

28

25

28

81

29

110

111

0.90

T-24

0.93

T-12

-0.03

T-22

76ERS

20-32

0.385

20

16

13

49

18

106

106

0.92

T-18

0.95

T-19

-0.03

T-22

GRIZZLIES

26-25

0.510

18

23

2

43

12

110

107

0.93

17

0.96

T-23

-0.03

T-22

CLIPPERS

21-31

0.404

26

17

16

59

20

106

106

0.90

T-24

0.94

T-16

-0.04

T-25

WIZARDS

17-33

0.340

25

21

20

66

24

107

107

0.91

T-22

0.95

T-19

-0.04

T-25

KINGS

18-34

0.346

23

27

11

61

21

111

110

0.92

T-18

0.96

T-23

-0.04

T-25

PISTONS

18-33

0.353

27

10

10

47

T-16

105

100

0.87

29

0.96

T-23

-0.09

T-28

T-WOLVES

13-40

0.245

29

28

14

71

26

112

110

0.88

T-27

0.97

T-29

-0.09

T-28

NETS

04-48

0.077

30

20

29

79

28

105

105

0.86

30

0.96

T-23

-0.1

30

LEGEND: W-L REC – Won-Loss Record; WIN% - Winning Percentage; PDR – Points Differential Ranking; PAR – Points Allowed Ranking; RDR – Rebounding Differential Ranking; QR – Quality Rating [i.e. PDR + PAR + RDR]; QIR – Quality Index Ranking [i.e. No. 1-30]; O-POSS/G – Offensive Possessions/Game [i.e. Possessions = FGA’s + TO’s + FTA’s*.44]; D-POSS/G – Defensive Possessions/Game; O-PPP – Offensive Points Per Possession; O-PPP RK – Offensive Points Per Possession Ranking; D-PPP – Defensive Points Per Possession; D-PPP RK – Defensive Points Per Possession Ranking; PPP-DIFF – Points Per Possession Differential; PPP-DIFF RK – Points Per Possession Differential Ranking; Blue Shade – Eastern Conference playoff teams; Red Shade – Western Conference playoff teams.

 

Most Efficient Defense in the NBA, Pre All-Star Break

Tuesday, February 23rd, 2010

The top defensive squads in the 1st half of the regular season were:

NBA 2009-2010

PRE ALL-STAR BREAK

TEAM EFFECTIVENESS RANKINGS

[as of Thu Feb 11 2010]

TEAM

W-L REC

WIN %

PDR

PAR

RDR

QR

QIR

OFF

POSS/G

DEF

POSS/G

O-PPP

O-PPP

RK

D-PPP

D-

PPP

RK

PPP

DIFF

PPP

DIFF

RK

LAKERS 1

41-13

0.759

2

9

7

18

T-4

109

108

0.95

T-12

0.89

T-1

0.06

T-3

THUNDER 6

30-21

0.588

9

5

4

18

T-4

107

107

0.92

T-18

0.89

T-1

0.03

T-9

CELTICS 4

32-18

0.640

5

1

23

29

9

103

105

0.96

T-7

0.89

T-1

0.07

2

BULLS 8

25-26

0.490

22

14

8

44

T-13

109

108

0.88

T-27

0.90

4

-0.02

T-19

CAVALIERS 1

43-11

0.796

1

2

1

4

1

103

104

0.99

T-2

0.91

T-5

0.08

1

MAGIC 2

36-18

0.667

3

7

5

15

2

104

106

0.97

T-5

0.91

T-5

0.06

T-3

BOBCATS 6

26-25

0.510

13

2

12

27

T-7

105

104

0.91

T-22

0.91

T-5

0.00

T-15

SPURS 5

30-21

0.588

6

8

3

17

3

105

104

0.96

T-7

0.92

T-8

0.04

T-7

JAZZ 3

32-19

0.627

6

12

9

27

T-7

106

106

0.97

T-5

0.92

T-8

0.05

T-5

HEAT 7

26-27

0.491

13

6

15

34

10

103

104

0.94

T-15

0.92

T-8

0.02

T-12

BUCKS

24-27

0.471

15

13

18

46

15

109

106

0.90

T-24

0.92

T-8

-0.02

T-19

HAWKS 3

33-18

0.647

8

11

20

39

11

105

105

0.96

T-7

0.93

T-12

0.03

T-9

NUGGETS 2

35-18

0.660

4

22

18

44

T-13

109

109

0.98

4

0.93

T-12

0.05

T-5

MAVERICKS 4

32-20

0.615

12

15

20

47

T-16

105

107

0.96

T-7

0.93

T-12

0.03

T-9

PACERS

18-34

0.346

28

25

28

81

29

110

111

0.90

T-24

0.93

T-12

-0.03

T-22

BLAZERS 8

31-24

0.564

11

4

6

21

6

102

101

0.96

T-7

0.94

T-16

0.02

T-12

ROCKETS

27-24

0.529

16

18

16

50

19

110

107

0.92

T-18

0.94

T-16

-0.02

T-19

CLIPPERS

21-31

0.404

26

17

16

59

20

106

106

0.90

T-24

0.94

T-16

-0.04

T-25

76ERS

20-32

0.385

20

16

13

49

18

106

106

0.92

T-18

0.95

T-19

-0.03

T-22

HORNETS

28-25

0.528

19

19

26

64

T-22

106

107

0.95

T-12

0.95

T-19

0.00

T-15

WIZARDS

17-33

0.340

25

21

20

66

24

107

107

0.91

T-22

0.95

T-19

-0.04

T-25

KNICKS

19-32

0.373

21

24

27

72

27

108

109

0.94

T-15

0.95

T-19

-0.01

17

GRIZZLIES

26-25

0.510

18

23

2

43

12

110

107

0.93

17

0.96

T-23

-0.03

T-22

PISTONS

18-33

0.353

27

10

10

47

T-16

105

100

0.87

29

0.96

T-23

-0.09

T-28

KINGS

18-34

0.346

23

27

11

61

21

111

110

0.92

T-18

0.96

T-23

-0.04

T-25

SUNS 7

31-22

0.585

10

29

25

64

T-22

110

112

1.00

1

0.96

T-23

0.04

T-7

NETS

04-48

0.077

30

20

29

79

28

105

105

0.86

30

0.96

T-23

-0.1

30

WARRIORS

13-40

0.245

24

30

30

84

30

113

116

0.95

T-12

0.96

T-23

-0.01

T-17

RAPTORS 5

29-23

0.558

17

26

24

67

25

106

108

0.99

T-2

0.97

T-29

0.02

T-12

T-WOLVES

13-40

0.245

29

28

14

71

26

112

110

0.88

T-27

0.97

T-29

-0.09

T-28

LEGEND: W-L REC – Won-Loss Record; WIN% - Winning Percentage; PDR – Points Differential Ranking; PAR – Points Allowed Ranking; RDR – Rebounding Differential Ranking; QR – Quality Rating [i.e. PDR + PAR + RDR]; QIR – Quality Index Ranking [i.e. No. 1-30]; O-POSS/G – Offensive Possessions/Game [i.e. Possessions = FGA’s + TO’s + FTA’s*.44]; D-POSS/G – Defensive Possessions/Game; O-PPP – Offensive Points Per Possession; O-PPP RK – Offensive Points Per Possession Ranking; D-PPP – Defensive Points Per Possession; D-PPP RK – Defensive Points Per Possession Ranking; PPP-DIFF – Points Per Possession Differential; PPP-DIFF RK – Points Per Possession Differential Ranking; Blue Shade – Eastern Conference playoff teams; Red Shade – Western Conference playoff teams.