Posts Tagged ‘Amir Johnson’

What will your answer be the next time you are asked, “Who is the Raptors’ best player?”

Wednesday, March 2nd, 2011

In the after-glow of last night’s home-court victory against the New Orleans Hornets … and, as the Toronto Raptors head to London, England, to play in the NBA’s first set of regular season games held beyond the borders of continental North America …

It is worthwhile taking note of who, exactly, has been the Toronto Raptors’ BEST PLAYER, thus far, this season.

In sharp contrast to what you might have been told by various voices surrounding the team, and/or eminating from different sources across the internet, the correct answer to this question is not:

i. Andrea Bargnani/C, the team’s leading scorer by a wide margin;

or,

ii. Amir Johnson/PF, the team’s leading rebounder by a wide margin;

or,

iii. DeMar DeRozan/OG-SF, the team’s most athletic player and two-time participant in the NBA’s All-Star Weekend festivities.

To this point, the Raptors’ BEST PLAYER has actually been none other than … JOSE MANUEL CALDERON/PG:

JOSE CALDERON’S PERFORMANCE FOR THE TORONTO RAPTORS

 

 

 

 

TEAM

 

SEASON

MP

kPER

kPER/MP

RANK

Behind

2010-2011

1687

+769

0.456

1st

None

2009-2010

1817

+750

0.413

3rd

Bosh & Jack [0.416]

2008-2009

2333

+1171

0.502

2nd

Bosh

2007-2008

2484

+1318

0.531

2nd

Bosh

2006-2007

1614

+743

0.460

2nd

Bosh

2005-2006

1487

+436

0.293

5th

James, Bosh, Peterson & Villanueva

LEGEND:
MP – Minutes Played; kPER – khandor’s Player Efficiency Rating [i.e.kPER =  Points – [FGA-FGM] – [FTA-FGM] + Reb + Ast + BS – TO – PF].

… whose on-court performance, since first coming to the NBA for the 2005-2006 season, ranks him as the 2nd best Raptors’ player of the last 6 years, behind only Chris Bosh/C-PF.

Kudos to Toronto’s Numero Ocho! 

… for piecing together another solid body of work, even amongst the ruins of a 17-win campaign, after almost being traded to the Charlotte Bobcats during the off season.  

Raptors win … with Offensive emphasis on Calderon and improved Pick Defense from their Bigs

Wednesday, March 2nd, 2011

Led by Jose Calderon … and much better Pick and Roll/Pop defense from their collection of Bigs … the Toronto Raptors played a very solid game last night against the visiting New Orleans Hornets.

If you take a close look at:

PART I

The complete Box Score, and pay particular attention to the category of kPER, which is an exclusive creation of yours truly:

——————————————————

New Orleans Hornets [35-27/.565]

STARTERS

MIN

FGM-A

3PM-A

FTM-A

OREB

DREB

REB

AST

STL

BLK

TO

PF

+/-

PTS

kPER

D/West, PF

39

7-17

0-1

5-6

2

8

10

4

0

0

2

3

-13

19

+17

T/Ariza, SF

21

3-9

2-4

2-2

1

1

2

0

0

1

2

2

-17

10

+3

E/Okafor, C

21

0-5

0-0

1-2

3

4

7

0

1

1

1

3

-6

1

-2

W/Green, SG

26

2-7

0-0

0-0

0

3

3

4

1

0

0

0

-12

4

+7

C/Paul, PG

38

3-10

0-2

1-1

0

4

4

5

1

0

1

5

-7

7

+4

BENCH

MIN

FGM-A

3PM-A

FTM-A

OREB

DREB

REB

AST

STL

BLK

TO

PF

+/-

PTS

kPER

J/Jack, PG

27

7-9

1-1

2-2

0

2

2

2

0

1

2

1

+3

17

+17

J/Smith, PF

7

1-1

0-0

0-0

0

2

2

1

0

0

0

1

+3

2

+4

C/Landry, PF

29

8-10

0-0

1-2

1

3

4

1

0

0

2

4

+4

17

+13

M/Belinelli, SG

24

5-14

3-5

0-0

0

1

1

0

0

0

1

2

+13

13

+2

Q/Pondexter, SF

9

0-0

0-0

0-0

0

1

1

0

0

0

0

1

+2

0

0

A/Gray, C

DNP COACH’S DECISION

D/Andersen, C

DNP COACH’S DECISION

TOTALS

 

FGM-A

3PM-A

FTM-A

OREB

DREB

REB

AST

STL

BLK

TO

PF

 

PTS

kPER

 

36-82

6-13

12-15

7

29

36

17

3

3

11

22

 

90

+65

 

43.9%

46.2%

80.0%

 
         

Total Possessions:

100

     

Pts/Poss:

0.900

     

Pts/Poss Diff:

-0.100

     

Fast break points:   4
Points in the paint:   40
Team TO ( points off ):   11 (9)

+/- denotes team’s net points while the player is on the court.

Toronto Raptors [17-44/.279]

STARTERS

MIN

FGM-A

3PM-A

FTM-A

OREB

DREB

REB

AST

STL

BLK

TO

PF

+/-

PTS

kPER

A/Johnson, PF

37

3-10

0-0

2-3

3

7

10

2

1

7

0

2

+11

8

+18

J/Johnson, SF

21

5-6

1-1

2-2

1

4

5

3

1

2

3

1

+4

13

+19

A/Bargnani, C

33

6-16

0-3

2-2

0

3

3

2

0

0

2

5

+10

14

+2

J/Calderon, PG

38

7-10

3-4

5-5

1

6

7

16

1

0

2

3

+18

22

+38

D/DeRozan, SG

36

8-17

0-1

1-1

0

1

1

0

0

0

0

1

+25

17

+8

BENCH

MIN

FGM-A

3PM-A

FTM-A

OREB

DREB

REB

AST

STL

BLK

TO

PF

+/-

PTS

kPER

L/Barbosa, SG

19

0-2

0-0

0-0

0

1

1

1

0

1

1

3

-12

0

-3

S/Weems, SG

20

6-12

0-0

2-2

0

2

2

2

0

0

1

0

-5

14

+17

J/Bayless, PG

10

1-2

0-1

0-0

0

1

1

2

0

0

0

1

-12

2

+3

E/Davis, PF

25

3-4

0-0

0-0

1

7

8

1

0

1

1

1

-9

6

+13

J/Wright, SF

DNP COACH’S DECISION

S/Alabi, C

DNP COACH’S DECISION

A/Ajinca, C

DNP COACH’S DECISION

TOTALS

 

FGM-A

3PM-A

FTM-A

OREB

DREB

REB

AST

STL

BLK

TO

PF

 

PTS

kPER

 

39-79

4-10

14-15

6

32

38

29

3

11

10

17

 

96

+115

 

49.4%

40.0%

93.3%

 
         

Total Possessions:

96

     

Pts/Poss:

1.00

     

Pts/Poss Diff:

+0.100

     

Fast break points:   12
Points in the paint:   50
Team TO ( points off ):   12 (10)

+/- denotes team’s net points while the player is on the court.

Flagrant Fouls: None
Technical Fouls: PLAYERS: None – TEAMS (def3sec): TORONTO (1), NEWORLEANS (2) – COACHES: None
Officials: Scott Wall , John Goble , Marc Davis
Attendance: 14,704
Time of Game: 02:08

——————————————————

you should be able to see clearly which specific players were most responsible for the 6-point margin of victory by the Raptors;

PART II

The Game Flow Chart

You should also be able to see clearly that, as long as the Raptors did not use specific players together – i.e. at the PG, OG and SF positions – who are ill-suited to play with one another:

2nd Quarter

13:11-15:22

2:11

 

 

 

 

 

PG

OG

SF

PF

C

+/-

N-Orleans

J/Jack

M/Belinelli

Q/Pondexter

C/Landry

J/Smith

+5

TORONTO

J/Bayless

L/Barbosa

S/Weems

A/Johnson

E/Davis

-5

Should be:

L/Barbosa

S/Weems

J/Wright

 

 

 

 

3rd Quarter

33:10-35:16

2:06

 

 

 

 

 

PG

OG

SF

PF

C

+/-

N-Orleans

C/Paul

J/Jack

M/Belinelli

D/West

C/Landry

+4

TORONTO

J/Calderon

S/Weems

J/Johnson

A/Johnson

E/Davis

-4

Should be:

J/Calderon

S/Weems

J/Wright

 

 

 

 

3rd Quarter

35:16-36:00

0:44

 

 

 

 

 

PG

OG

SF

PF

C

+/-

N-Orleans

C/Paul

J/Jack

M/Belinelli

D/West

C/Landry

+3

TORONTO

J/Calderon

L/Barbosa

S/Weems

A/Johnson

E/Davis

-3

Should be:

J/Calderon

S/Weems

J/Wright

 

 

 

 

4th Quarter

36:00-39:07

3:07

 

 

 

 

 

PG

OG

SF

PF

C

+/-

N-Orleans

C/Paul

J/Jack

M/Belinelli

D/West

C/Landry

+7

TORONTO

J/Bayless

L/Barbosa

S/Weems

E/Davis

A/Bargnani

-7

Should be:

J/Calderon

S/Weems

J/Wright

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

TOTAL

-19

they were actually a far superior team to the Hornets last night;

and,

PART III

Jay Triano’s observations at his post-game press conference

You should be able to see clearly just how important improved Pick and Roll/Pop defense from the team’s Bigs against:

i. The Picker;
ii. The original ball-handler; and,
iii. The other non-Picking Big [in various rotation situations];

actually is to the Raptors’ overall defensive efficiency.

If/when the Raptors play Team Basketball that looks LIKE THAT, then … even with their current less than stellar roster … they are certainly capable of finishing in the middle section of the league standings.

Where the Raptors rate, at the All-Star Break

Friday, February 18th, 2011

For those NBA observers with a keen interest in the statistical evaluation of all 30 teams, at the unofficial half-way point of the regular season schedule:

POINTS SCORED PER POSSESSION DIFFERENTIAL AND WIN PERCENTAGE, PRIOR TO THE ALL-STAR BREAK

Team

PS

Poss

PSPP

Rk

 

Opp PS

Opp Poss

OPSPP

Rk

 

PSPP-Diff

Rk

 

Win%

Rk

ATL

5322

5610.84

0.949

12

 

5249

5637.68

0.931

13

 

0.018

12

 

.618

9

BOS

5286

5455.04

0.969

8

 

4922

5611.92

0.877

1

 

0.092

2

 

.741

2

CHA

5252

5817.96

0.903

24

 

5408

5779.8

0.936

15

 

-0.033

22

 

.429

21

CHI

5313

5720.72

0.929

17

 

4990

5678.44

0.879

2

 

0.050

6

 

.704

5

CLE

5325

5966.6

0.892

26

 

5923

5983.84

0.990

30

 

-0.097

30

 

.179

30

DAL

5538

5684.2

0.974

5

 

5352

5817.8

0.920

10

 

0.054

5

 

.714

4

DEN

6132

6124.76

1.001

1

 

5994

6209.36

0.965

26

 

0.036

8

 

.561

12

DET

5407

5883.96

0.919

19

 

5637

5828.4

0.967

27

 

-0.048

23

 

.368

24

GSW

5662

6003.24

0.943

14

 

5802

6069.04

0.956

23

 

-0.013

20

 

.473

18

HOU

5992

6253.68

0.958

10

 

5979

6229.84

0.960

24

 

-0.002

17

 

.456

19

IND

5374

5848.52

0.919

20

 

5391

5838.84

0.923

12

 

-0.004

18

 

.444

20

LAC

5532

6080.2

0.910

23

 

5694

5929.92

0.960

25

 

-0.050

24

 

.375

23

LAL

5829

6055.84

0.963

9

 

5495

6060.56

0.907

6

 

0.056

4

 

.667

6

MEM

5675

6176.76

0.919

21

 

5583

6106.08

0.914

8

 

0.004

15

 

.544

T13

MIA

5707

5806.48

0.983

2

 

5269

5918.08

0.890

3

 

0.093

1

 

.732

3

MIL

5024

5711.28

0.880

30

 

5102

5621.72

0.908

7

 

-0.028

21

 

.382

22

MIN

5714

6383.2

0.895

25

 

6045

6212.88

0.973

28

 

-0.078

29

 

.232

29

NJN

5267

5906

0.892

27

 

5621

5884.84

0.955

21

 

-0.063

26

 

.298

25

NOR

5496

5905.24

0.931

16

 

5388

5878.84

0.917

9

 

0.014

14

 

.569

11

NYK

5737

5891.68

0.974

6

 

5713

6027.6

0.948

18

 

0.026

10

 

.519

15

OKC

5652

5816.4

0.972

7

 

5530

5881.72

0.940

16

 

0.032

9

 

.648

7

ORL

5686

5988.96

0.949

11

 

5355

5953

0.900

4

 

0.050

7

 

.632

8

PHI

5497

5867.88

0.937

15

 

5427

5895.84

0.920

11

 

0.016

13

 

.482

17

PHO

5674

5809.4

0.977

4

 

5696

5962.12

0.955

22

 

0.021

11

 

.500

16

POR

5387

5836.92

0.923

18

 

5345

5726.96

0.933

14

 

-0.010

19

 

.571

10

SAC

5175

5879.6

0.880

29

 

5453

5741.16

0.950

20

 

-0.070

28

 

.245

28

SAS

5794

5901.24

0.982

3

 

5395

5957.4

0.906

5

 

0.076

3

 

.821

1

TOR

5523

6056.28

0.912

22

 

5850

5983.84

0.978

29

 

-0.066

27

 

.268

27

UTH

5664

5986.68

0.946

13

 

5682

5996.48

0.948

17

 

-0.001

16

 

.544

T13

WAS

5219

5855.04

0.891

28

 

5565

5860.6

0.950

19

 

-0.058

25

 

.278

26

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LEGEND:

PS – Points Scored; Poss – Estimated Possessions [i.e. FGA+FTA*.44+TO]; PSPP – Points Scored Per Possession; Opp PS – Opponents’ Points Scored; Opp Poss – Estimated Opponents’ Posssessions [i.e. Opp FGA+Opp FTA*.44+Opp TO]; OPSPP – Opponents’ Points Scored Per Possession; PSPP-Diff – Points Scored Per Possession Differential; Win% – Win Percentage; Rk – Ranking [i.e. Nos.1-30].

———————————–

TORONTO RAPTORS PERSPECTIVE

According to what was said by Bryan Colangelo & Co., in the aftermath of Chris Bosh’s departure last summer, as an unrestricted free agent, the 2010-2011 season was supposed to be about two specific things:

Toronto Raptors’ Media Day 2010 Recap – Raptors HQ

1. Still competing for a lower tier playoff position;

and, 

2. The continuing “development” of their core group of young players … e.g. Andrea Bargnani/C, DeMar DeRozan/OG-SF, Amir Johnson/PF, Linas Kleiza/SF-PF, Sonny Weems/OG-SF and Ed Davis/PF … from a defensive and rebounding perspective. 

After 56 games, the “2010-2011 Objectives” scorecard now reads, “0-2″.

Injuries have Raptors heading back to NBA Draft Lottery … and, eventually, becoming relevant again

Thursday, January 27th, 2011

Last night’s 9th consecutive loss for the Raptors means that Toronto has now plummeted to the 4th worst W-L record in the NBA:

30 Cleveland Cavaliers, 8-37/.178
29 Minnesota Timberwolves, 10-35/.222
28 Sacramento Kings, 10-33/.233 
27 Toronto Raptors, 13-33/.283
26 Washington Wizards, 13-31/.295

and, once again, has a legitimate chance to secure a Top 3 Selection in the 2011 NBA Draft Lottery.

If the Raptors management group actually has the necessary level of Basketball Acumen to take full advantage of the team’s recent spate of injuries there is no legitimate reason Toronto cannot make a gradual rise in the standings over the course of the next few seasons and become firmly entrenched in the upper echelon of the Eastern Conference.

FRANCHISE STRENGTHS

1. Top 3 Selection in the 2011 NBA Draft Lottery [?]
2. No. 1 Selection in the 2006 NBA Draft Lottery, i.e. Andrea Bargnani, C
3. No. 9 Selection in the 2009 NBA Draft Lottery, i.e. DeMar DeRozan, OG
4. No. 13 Selection in the 2010 NBA Draft Lottery, i.e. Ed Davis, PF
5. $10.8 M Traded Player Exception [TPE], obtained in exchange for Chris Bosh
6. Expiring contract of Reggie Evans [$5.1 M]
7. Expiring contract of Leandro Barbosa [$7.1 M]
8. Starting calibre PG, i.e. Jose Calderon [$9.0 M, plus 2 more years]
9. Rotation calibre PF, i.e. Amir Johnson [$5.0 M, plus 4 more years]
10. Rotation calibre SF, i.e. Linas Kleiza [$5.0 M, plus 2 more years]
11. Rotation calibre PG/OG, i.e. Jerryd Bayless [$2.3 M, plus 1 more year]  
12. Salary Cap space … if the team chooses not to re-sign Sonny Weems [$0.9 M, 1 yr], Joey Dorsey [$0.9 M, 1 yr], Alexis Ajinca [$1.5 M, 1 yr] and Julian Wright [$2.9 M, 1 yr] after this season
13. World-class city with the 3rd largest market in North America
14. 10th most valuable franchise in the NBA
15. Rabid, loyal fan base

FRANCHISE WEAKNESSES

1. The absence of a deep pocketed ownership group that SHOULD BE prepared to EXCEED the Salary Cap and the Luxury Tax Threshold on an ANNUAL BASIS.

2. The absence of a highly respected General Manager with first-hand experience in the construction/operation of a championship-winning organization.

3. The absence of a highly respected Head Coach with first-hand experience in the construction/operation of a championship-winning organization.

4. An organizational culture which has failed to prioritize the winning of the League Championship as The Standard for Team Success.

5. An organizational culture which has failed to prioritize Team DefenseTeam Rebounding and Team Offense as the THREE MAIN COMPONENTS required for Team Success.

——————————————————-

The fact is …

In the 16 year history of the Raptors franchise, there have already been 3 prior occasions when the team was well-positioned to begin a gradual climb towards the top of the Eastern Conference:

First, when Toronto used the No. 4 Selection in the 1998 NBA Draft to pick Antawn Jamison/PF and then immediately traded him to obtain Vince Carter/SF-OG [No. 5 Selection, Golden State Warriors];

1998-1999, 23 wins
1999-2000, 45 wins [up ... but, failed to retain the services of Tracy McGrady]
2000-2001, 47 wins [up]
2001-2002, 42 wins [down]
2002-2003, 24 wins [down]

Second, when Toronto used the No. 4 Selection in the 2003 NBA Draft to pick Chris Bosh/C-PF;

2003-2004, 33 wins [up]
2004-2005, 33 wins [same ... but, traded Vince Carter]
2005-2006, 27 wins [down]

Third, when Toronto used the No. 1 Selection in the 2006 NBA Draft to pick Andrea Bargnani/C;

2006-2007, 47 wins [up]
2007-2008, 41 wins [down]
2008-2009, 33 wins [down]
2009-2010, 40 wins [up ... but, failed to retain the services of Chris Bosh]
2010-2011, 13 wins so far [down?]

and, in each instance, the opportunity has been wasted by the relatively poor work of their:

i. Ownership Group, whose chief responsibility is to hire the right GM and then stay out of his way; 

ii. General Manager[s], whose chief responsibilities are to: A. Hire the right Head Coach & Staff, and B. Obtain the right mix of players, and then stay out of their way; 

iii. Head Coach[es] and staff[s], whose chief responsibilities are to: A. Fully develop the players on their roster into a highly effective and cohesive group, and B. Win as many games and playoff series as possible, on an annual basis;

with the prime directive being, “The Winning of the League Championship.”  

Hopefully, this time around …

Kyrie Irving/PG, Duke University
Harrison Barnes/SF, University of North Carolina
Jan Veseley/SF, Partizan-Belgrade

the Raptors’ management group doesn’t screw it up, again.   

Identifying correctly what actually lost last night’s game for the Raptors

Thursday, January 13th, 2011

The Toronto Raptors lost a hard fought game to the visiting Atlanta Hawks last night:

Atlanta Hawks 104
TORONTO RAPTORS 101
Complete Game Info

but, instead of whining about the discrepancy in fouls called against the Raptors by a fairly veteran crew of officials … i.e. Bill Spooner, Rodney Mott and Haywoode Workman … which is really as good as it gets for a Wednesday night in the NBA with 11 games on the slate, what the Raptors and their rabid fanbase should actually be moaning about today is the poor defensive execution displayed by their own team on the following possession which allowed the Hawks to take the lead for good, on a simple “catch-and-shoot-3PT-shot” by notorious Raptors killer, Mike Bibby, with Atlanta down 2 points and 10.3 secs left in the 4th quarter:  

 

 

Q1. Which of the following individuals for the Raptors was at fault for failing to carry out his assignment properly on this specific defensive sequence?

i. Jose Calderon,
ii. Amir Johnson,
iii. DeMar DeRozan,
iv. Andrea Bargnani,
v. Leandro Barbosa,
vi. Jay Triano?
  

A1. If you’ve been a regular visitor to this blog over the last several years, then, you should already be able to answer this question correctly for yourself.

———————————–

When a team is currently ranked:

A. 26th in [5th last] Points Allowed [i.e. 105.1], and

B. 30th [last] in Defensive Field Goal % [i.e. 49.2],

that team’s supporters need to understand that the primary reason they lost a very winnable game last night has nothing to do with the poor quality of officiating their team received but the poor quality of defensive execution by specific players and coaches when the outcome of the game was actually on the line.

FWIW, here’s the correct answer to the question posed above:

i. Demar DeRozan … did his job properly.
ii. Amir Johnson … did his job properly.
iii. Andrea Bargnani … failed to do his job properly.
iv. Leandro Barbosa … failed to do his job properly.
v. Jose Calderon … failed to do his job properly.
vi. Jay Triano … failed to do his job properly.  

SPECIFIC RATIONALE

re: Bargnani [i.e. near screener's defender]
The primary responsibilities of the screen defender – in the double screen action – who is closest to the inbounds passer is to:

- see the 2 cuts happening from the player located above/below the double screen [i.e. Mike Bibby]

and,

- jump out on the near/high side of the double screen to deter and/or intercept/deflect a direct pass to the shooter popping out at the top of the key

re: Barbosa [i.e. inbounds passer's defender]
The primary responsibilities of the inbounds passer’s defender is to:

- ”jam the passer” so that he is not able to complete a direct pass to a teammate cutting to the top of the key with the benefit of a single, double, or staggered set of screens

re: Calderon [i.e. weak side shooter's defender]
The primary responsibilities of the defender who is checking the player located above/below the double screen is to:

- “stay below” and towards the “basket side” of his own check

- “switch” vs any little-on-little cross screen action that ahppens below the double screen

- “chase” the shooter who comes out towards his side of the floor “around” the double screen action at the top of the key … and into the area of screen defender who is nearest the inbounds passer … by “trailing” on the hip of the shooter rather than attempting to fight “through” the middle of the 2 screeners

re: Triano
The primary responsibilities of the head coach whose team is leading by 2 points with only 10.3 secs left in the 4th quarter and the opponent with the ball in a sideline out-of-bounds situation, when coming from a called time-out is, to:

- Ensure that his players fully understand what they MUST DO in order to NOT GIVE UP an open 3PT-shot … either, from the top of the key, or the near wing/corner … which can lose them the game, outright, as opposed to surrendering a 2PT-shot which can only tie the score 

re: Amir Johnson [i.e. far screener's defender]
The primary responsibilities of the screen defender – in the double screen action – who is furthest from the inbounds passer is to:

- stay below the double screen, in order to cover whichever screener might step towards the basket in response to the actions of the near screen defender and the weak side shooter’s defender 

re: DeMar DeRozan [i.e. ball side shooter's defender]
The primary responsibilities of the defender who is checking the shooter located in the ball side low post is to:

- “front” vs this shooter so that he does not receive a direct entry pass

- “switch” vs any little-on-little cross screen action which occurs below the below screen

- “chase” vs any cut made by his individual check which does not involve the use of a single, double or staggered set of screens

—————————————————–

Kudos to the Hawks’ Larry Drew, Jamal Crawford, Al Horford, Josh Smith and Mike Bibby for doing each of their jobs properly and executing this basic offensive play! 

W vs Cavaliers reveals, both, good and bad for Raptors

Thursday, January 6th, 2011

Toronto Raptors 120
CLEVELAND CAVALIERS 105
Complete Game Info

———————————————–

SUBSTITUTION CHART

Time

Team

PG

OG

SF

PF

C

START

END

DIFF

1ST Q

Tor

Calderon

DeRozan

Kleiza

Johnson

Bargnani

00

11

 

12:00

CLE

Williams

Gibson

Gee

Jamison

Varejao

00

20

+9

 

06:55

Time-out: Regular/Toronto [CLE 15, Tor 6]

 

 

Tor

Calderon

DeRozan

Kleiza

Johnson

Bargnani

11

13

 

05:14

CLE

Sessions

Gibson

Eyenga

Jamison

Varejao

20

22

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tor

Calderon

Barbosa

DeRozan

Johnson

Davis

13

19

 

04:43

CLE

Sessions

Gibson

Eyenga

Jamison

Varejao

22

32

+4

 

02:06

Time-out: Short/Toronto [CLE 32, Tor 19]

 

 

Tor

Barbosa

DeRozan

Kleiza

Johnson

Davis

19

19

 

02:06

CLE

Sessions

Gibson

Eyenga

Jamison

Varejao

32

34

+2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tor

Barbosa

Kleiza

Wright

Davis

Bargnani

19

26

 

01:29

CLE

Sessions

Gibson

Eyenga

Jamison

Varejao

34

38

-3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tor

Barbosa

Kleiza

Wright

Davis

Bargnani

26

26

 

31.2

CLE

Sessions

Gee

Eyenga

Jamison

Varejao

38

38

0

 

2nd Q

Tor

Barbosa

Kleiza

Wright

Davis

Bargnani

26

30

 

12:00

CLE

Sessions

Gee

Eyenga

Powe

Hollins

38

38

-4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tor

Barbosa

Kleiza

Wright

Davis

Bargnani

30

39

 

10:33

CLE

Williams

Sessions

Gee

Powe

Hollins

38

46

-1

 

10:15

Time-out: Regular/CLEVELAND [CLE 38, Tor 33]

 

 

Tor

Calderon

Barbosa

Wright

Johnson

Bargnani

39

46

 

07:46

CLE

Williams

Gibson

Gee

Powe

Varejao

46

48

-5

 

06:30

Time-out: Short/CLEVELAND [CLE 48, Tor 46]

 

 

Tor

Calderon

Barbosa

Wright

Johnson

Bargnani

46

50

 

06:30

CLE

Williams

Gibson

Gee

Jamison

Varejao

48

48

-4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tor

Calderon

Barbosa

Wright

Johnson

Davis

50

50

 

04:53

CLE

Williams

Gibson

Gee

Jamison

Varejao

48

50

+2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tor

Calderon

Barbosa

Wright

Johnson

Davis

50

50

 

04:39

CLE

Williams

Gibson

Eyenga

Jamison

Varejao

50

50

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tor

Calderon

Barbosa

Wright

Davis

Bargnani

50

61

 

04:12

CLE

Williams

Gibson

Eyenga

Jamison

Varejao

50

61

0

 

01:56

Time-out: Regular/Toronto [CLE 56, Tor 56]

 

 

Tor

Calderon

Barbosa

Wright

Kleiza

Davis

61

63

 

43.9

CLE

Williams

Gibson

Gee

Eyenga

Jamison

61

61

-2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tor

Calderon

Barbosa

Wright

Kleiza

Davis

63

63

 

34.1

CLE

Williams

Sessions

Gee

Eyenga

Jamison

61

63

+2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tor

Calderon

Barbosa

Wright

Kleiza

Bargnani

63

66

 

16.9

CLE

Williams

Sessions

Gee

Eyenga

Jamison

63

63

-3

 

3rd Q

Tor

Calderon

DeRozan

Kleiza

Johnson

Bargnani

66

73

 

12:00

CLE

Williams

Gibson

Gee

Jamison

Varejao

63

67

-3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tor

Calderon

DeRozan

Kleiza

Davis

Bargnani

73

75

 

08:08

CLE

Williams

Gibson

Gee

Jamison

Varejao

67

74

+5

 

05:46

Time-out: Regular/CLEVELAND [CLE 72, Tor 75]

 

 

Tor

Calderon

Barbosa

Wright

Davis

Bargnani

75

77

 

05:46

CLE

Williams

Gibson

Gee

Jamison

Varejao

74

74

-2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tor

Calderon

Barbosa

Wright

Davis

Bargnani

77

87

 

04:58

CLE

Williams

Sessions

Eyenga

Jamison

Varejao

74

77

-7

 

02:40

Time-out: Short/CLEVELAND [CLE 77, Tor 87]

 

02:40

Time-out: Regular/Toronto [CLE 77, Tor 87]

 

 

Tor

Calderon

Barbosa

Wright

Davis

Bargnani

87

87

 

02:40

CLE

Williams

Sessions

Eyenga

Jamison

Hollins

77

79

+2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tor

Barbosa

DeRozan

Wright

Davis

Dorsey

87

90

 

01:40

CLE

Williams

Sessions

Eyenga

Jamison

Hollins

79

84

+2

 

4th Q

Tor

Calderon

DeRozan

Wright

Davis

Bargnani

90

96

 

12:00

CLE

Sessions

Harris

Eyenga

Jamison

Hollins

84

87

-3

 

11:18

Time-out: Regular/Toronto [CLE 84, Tor 92]

 

 

Tor

Calderon

DeRozan

Wright

Johnson

Bargnani

96

100

 

09:40

CLE

Sessions

Harris

Eyenga

Jamison

Varejao

87

90

-1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tor

Calderon

DeRozan

Wright

Johnson

Bargnani

100

110

 

08:28

CLE

Williams

Sessions

Eyenga

Jamison

Varejao

90

99

-1

 

07:43

Time-out: Regular/CLEVELAND [CLE 90, Tor 105]

 

 

Tor

Calderon

Barbosa

Wright

Johnson

Bargnani

110

118

 

04:46

CLE

Williams

Sessions

Eyenga

Jamison

Varejao

99

99

-8

 

02:44

Time-out: Regular/CLEVELAND [CLE 99, Tor 118]

 

 

Tor

Calderon

Barbosa

Wright

Davis

Dorsey

118

118

 

02:44

CLE

Sessions

Harris

Gee

Eyenga

Hollins

99

101

+2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tor

Calderon

Barbosa

Wright

Dorsey

Alabi

118

118

 

02:32

CLE

Sessions

Harris

Gee

Eyenga

Hollins

101

101

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tor

Barbosa

DeRozan

Wright

Dorsey

Alabi

118

120

 

02:10

CLE

Sessions

Harris

Gee

Eyenga

Hollins

101

105

+2

LEGEND:
Bold – Player substituted into game; Italics – Player moved to new position; Start – Score at beginning of shift; End – Score at conclusion of shift; Diff – Home team’s points difference during shift.

 

- Time-out called;

 

- Run of points scored for Toronto;

 

- Significant “positive” shift for  Toronto;

 

- Run of points scored for Cleveland;

 

- Significant “positive” shift for Cleveland.

———————————————–

From the Raptors’ perspective …

How the good and bad played out, in last night’s game:

No.

Player

Pos.

GOOD

BAD

1

Jose
Calderon

PG

Solid offensively and capable of playing as a “starter” for a high end team … when healthy, and supported by at least 2 adequate defensively-oriented teammates in a cohesive 5-man unit

Limited defensively

2

MeMar
DeRozan

OG

Evolving perimeter-based scorer.

Mediocre defensive skill-set.

3